1 / 7

FY13 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee September 9, 2013

FY13 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee September 9, 2013. FY13 Budget Review .

charisma-spino
Download Presentation

FY13 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee September 9, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FY13 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal CommitteeSeptember 9, 2013

  2. FY13 Budget Review • The Governor has filed in the FY13 closeout supplemental budget a PAC of $85K for the 3000-1000 to support the Springfield relocation expenses. The $8.5M PAC for 3000-4060 has already been passed into law. The funds will be moved into the FY14 3000-4060 once the Comptroller closes the FY13 books.

  3. Historical Reversion Rate • FY13 PAC is assumed in reversion rate. • 3000-6000 expenses in FY10 & FY11 are consolidated into 3000-7050

  4. FY13 Budget Review without Caseload • The Governor has filed in the FY13 closeout supplemental budget a PAC of $85K for the 3000-1000 to support the Springfield relocation expenses.

  5. FY13 Budget Expenditure Review • Why are there Unexpended Funds in the non-caseload accounts? • 3000-1000 - $92K: Much of the reversion (not including the Springfield costs that may be PAC’d in FY14) were staff related. Originally, ANF did not approve backfills we represented on the FY13 Spending Plan. Though ANF relented on most positions, hiring was delayed, thus producing savings compared with our original projections. • 3000-2000 - $114K: Primary source of reversion was that the contractor could not produce all the planned statewide materials prior to the close of the fiscal year. • 3000-5075 - $185K: There were some savings in the non grant object classes. The legislature loaded $18K into the CC object class based on FY11 spending (contractor that helped write the RTTELC application). The bulk of the reversions, however, were related to the PP grant object class. • 3000-6075 - $26K: All grant funds were awarded, but one recipient (Mass Society for Prevention) did not expend their full grant award. • 3000-7050 - $252K: Reversions were spread out through the HH (consultants), JJ (translation and training), and PP (grants) object classes. Examples are: The FCC Systems Assessment Consultant project budgeted for $50K in HH, but actually only did not materialize; and grantees not spending $88K of the total grant amounts awarded by EEC in FY13.

  6. FY13 Caseload Overview SummaryAs of August 2013

  7. FY13 Caseload by Account

More Related