1 / 14

Two-Pion Correlations with @ RHIC

Two-Pion Correlations with @ RHIC. Chia-Ming, Kuo National Central University, Taiwan for PHOBOS Collaboration. Collaboration. Birger Back, Mark Baker, Maarten Ballintijn, Donald Barton, Russell Betts, Abigail Bickley ,

charles-lang
Download Presentation

Two-Pion Correlations with @ RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Two-Pion Correlations with @ RHIC Chia-Ming, KuoNational Central University, Taiwanfor PHOBOS Collaboration

  2. Collaboration Birger Back,Mark Baker, Maarten Ballintijn, Donald Barton, Russell Betts, Abigail Bickley, Richard Bindel, Wit Busza (Spokesperson), Alan Carroll, Zhengwei Chai, Patrick Decowski, Edmundo Garcia, Tomasz Gburek, Nigel George, Kristjan Gulbrandsen, Stephen Gushue, Clive Halliwell, Joshua Hamblen, Adam Harrington, Conor Henderson, David Hofman, Richard Hollis, Roman Hołyński, Burt Holzman, Aneta Iordanova, Erik Johnson, Jay Kane, Nazim Khan, Piotr Kulinich, Chia Ming Kuo, Willis Lin, Steven Manly, Alice Mignerey, Gerrit van Nieuwenhuizen, Rachid Nouicer, Andrzej Olszewski, Robert Pak, Inkyu Park, Heinz Pernegger, Corey Reed, Michael Ricci, Christof Roland, Gunther Roland, Joe Sagerer, Iouri Sedykh, Wojtek Skulski, Chadd Smith, Peter Steinberg, George Stephans, Andrei Sukhanov, Marguerite Belt Tonjes, Adam Trzupek, Carla Vale, Siarhei Vaurynovich, Robin Verdier, Gábor Veres, Edward Wenger, Frank Wolfs, Barbara Wosiek, Krzysztof Woźniak, Alan Wuosmaa, Bolek Wysłouch, Jinlong Zhang ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS, KRAKOW MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY, TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER

  3. Y (side) X (out) if x-t correlation is absent & x～y STAR PHENIX DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Motivation Prediction :First order phase transition leads to a prolonged hadronization timeExpectation :Large HBT radii PHENIX and STAR results showthat Rout/Rside ~ 1 at 130 GeV “ The HBT Puzzle “

  4. Spectrometer Vertex 1m Octagon Paddle Trigger Counter Ring Counters Cerenkov Counter 137000 Silicon Pad Channels ZDC 12 meters of Beryllium beampipe ZDC DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Detector @ 2001

  5. DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Spectrometer & Tracking  Reversible 2T magnetic field Two symmetric spectrometer arms Tracking within 10 cm of interaction point – providing a small two-particle inefficiency (~ 25x50 mrad in θ and ψ space)  Phi acceptance of 3% each arm Ghost tracks ~ 0.3% p/p is better than 1.5% for p<0.7GeV

  6. DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo PID & Spec. Acceptance --

  7. DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Coulomb Correction “E866” Approximate Coulomb Correction (PRC 66, 54906 (2002)) Full-Wave Coulomb Correction “Partial” Coulomb Correction Coulomb Correction Coulomb Correction Gamowλ = 1 Rinv = 5 fm λ = 0.5 Rinv = 5 fmλ = 0.1 Rinv = 5 fm Gamowλ = 1 Rinv = 5 fm λ = 1 Rinv = 10 fm Qinv (GeV/c) Qinv (GeV/c)

  8. PHOBOS 200 GeV preliminary DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Data Sample  Cut off the area that two-particle acceptance < 95 % Apply “Partial” Coulomb (λ≠1) correction to mixed pairs

  9. DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo HBT Results 0.2<y<1.5 Phobos preliminary 200 GeV Au-Au 0.15<kT<0.35 15 % most central events  Rout Rside Rlong R2out-long - - 0.540.02 5.80.2 5.10.4 6.80.3 4.91.7 ++ 0.570.03 5.80.2 4.90.4 7.30.3 4.51.9 Systematic error on radii of 1 fm, on  of 0.06

  10. DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Scaling with Energy -- data ● E895○ E866■ NA49▼ NA44◆ WA98 ▲ STAR● PHOBOS Prelim. Preliminary 200 GeV results are agreed between PHOBOS, STAR & PHENIX

  11. Conclusions • Using RHIC 2001 run data (Au+Au @ 200 GeV) to analyze HBT correlations •  HBT radii are similar to RHIC 130 GeV results The HBT puzzle still goes on ….. More Kt bins will come Systematic studies are underway DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo

  12. Positive Paddles Negative Paddles NegativeCerenkov PositiveCerenkov Negative ZDC Positive ZDC Au Au PN PP Peripheral 200 GeV Data x z ZDC Signal (a.u.) Nspectator=2A-Npart Central Paddle signal (a.u.) Npart Trigger & Event Selection • Coincidence between Paddle counters at t = 0 defines a valid collision • Paddle + ZDC timing reject background • Trigger sensitive to 97% of inelastic cross section for Au+Au at 200 GeV  Analyzing 15% most central events -12 < Vertex Z < 10 cm

  13. Two-Particle Acceptance TPA is parameterized by (Δθ,ΔYA) ΔYA = 1 ΔYA = 0 Cut off two-particle acceptance < 95 % ΔYA = 2 ΔYA = 3

  14. DNP, APS 2003 Fall Meeting / Chia-Ming, Kuo Rout/Rside @ 200GeV ● PHOBOS 200 GeV preliminary★ STAR 200 GeV preliminary▲ PHENIX 200 GeV preliminary Systematic errors are not shown

More Related