E N D
1. Creosote - 43 Years of Experience as a Ground Contact Preservative
2. Presentation Overview
History & Background
Creosote Types & Attributes
Visual Grading Scale
Visual Grading Examples
Performance Summary
Conclusion
3. History & Background Established 1958
Located on the Blessing Plantation - just North of Charleston, SC
Severe deterioration zone per AWPA Standard C4
Survived Hurricane Hugo in 1989!
4. History & Background
Cooperative test between 4 creosote suppliers:
Allied Chemical
US Steel
Koppers Industries
Bernuth Lembcke Co.
5. History & Background 7 ft. Southern yellow pine posts
11 types of creosote / creosote blends installed
Retention targets of 4, 6 & 8 pcf.
6. Creosote Types
Creosotes designated A, C, D, F and G were straight run distillates.
Creosotes designated B and E contained 2% pentachlorophenol.
Creosotes designated H and I were 70/30 solutions meeting the 1958 P2 Standard (not available).
Creosotes solutions J and K were 50/50 solutions meeting the 1958 P3 Standard.
7. Selected Attributes of Creosotes Creosote types A & D had the lowest residue at 355şF, with A being the most volatile.
Type G is the closest to the blend of P1/P13 used today.
Type F meets the current P2 Standard.
8. Visual Grading Scale
10 indicated a sound post
9 rating allowed surface softness up to 1/8” deep
7 rating indicated general surface decay, up to 1/4” deep.
4 rating indicated decay exceeding 1/2”, and
0 rating indicated failure - post easily broken.
9. Visual Grading Examples
13. Conclusions This test represents the longest continuous evaluation of creosote treated posts
2 creosote blends, G & F, are exhibiting excellent performance and most closely represent current P1/P13 and P2 Standard products.
Creosote has been demonstrated to provide outstanding long term protection in harsh, ground contact applications