320 likes | 425 Views
MOLLER Spectrometer Update. Juliette M. Mammei. Future Priorities (from last meeting). Lower priority. Physicist input to engineering (highest priority) Magnetic force studies Sensitivity studies Design of the water-cooling and electrical services
E N D
MOLLER Spectrometer Update Juliette M. Mammei
Future Priorities (from last meeting) Lower priority • Physicist input to engineering (highest priority) • Magnetic force studies • Sensitivity studies • Design of the water-cooling and electrical services • Radiation doses (brought up by companies) • Optimization of the optics • He bag/central beam pipe • Multiple magnets • No negative bend • Iron in coils • Engineering work (MIT/Bates) • Design of support structure • Vacuum vessel design MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Bids MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014 • Forces with asymmetric coils • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/297 (Jason) • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/298 (Juliette) • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/299 (Juliette) • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/300 (Juliette) • Radiation dose on coils • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/305 (Tyler) • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/306(Seamus) • Coil sensitivities • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/287 (Sakib, Juliette preliminary) • http://ace.phys.virginia.edu/MollerSpectrometer/308 (Tyler) • See slides • Support Structure • See slides • Vacuum vessel • See slides
Forces New Old Coil off Forces on coil to beam left with adjacent coil off MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Forces Old New Coil off MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Sensitivity Studies • Need to consider the effects of asymmetric coils, misalignments etc. on acceptance • This could affect our manufacturing tolerances and support structure • Have created field maps for a single coil misplaced by five steps in: • -1° < pitch < 1° • -4° < roll < 4° • -1° < yaw < 1° • -2 < r < 2 cm • -10 < z < 10cm • -5° < φ < 5° Axes in frame of single coil MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Sensitivity Studies What are the relevant ,, , We’ll measure a certain rate R and asymmetry A in each septant. We assume the allowable uncertainty on A to be 0.1 ppb Slopes give, for example, Then , the uncertainty in z allowed Our ability to determine in that septant may also be important. MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Preliminary Results Fit to plots is given by in range where approximately linear Then, for example, (>10 cm over magnet length) where What about physical constraints? MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Closest approach MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Summary • These results have some simulations with same random seed (statistical uncertainty is not as good as it seems) • Need to re-run those simulations and redo the results • All plots vs. offset treated as linear, though some clearly are not • Very preliminary results show order ~3 mm sensitivities (not sub-mm) • Need to look at the effect of tracking algorithm with incorrect maps • What is the most important parameter – what is it that will determine the sensitivity • A background correction done incorrectly? • The mean asymmetry, as I’ve assumed here? • The mean θlab, which will go into the extraction of sin2θW? MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Neutron shielding MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Radiation dose MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Support Structure MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Frame Design MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Vacuum Chamber design MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Cut away views MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Stress and deformation analysis MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Bids? MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Extra Slides MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Tracks in GEANT4 for nominal field Mollers eps MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014 (Rate weighted 1x1cm2 bins)
Slopes give, for example, Then , the uncertainty in z allowed What are the relevant ,, , We’ll measure a certain R and A in each septant. What matters is our ability to determine in that septant. MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
Assuming The uncertainty on is: ~ 0.001 GeV ~ 0.001 GeV ~ 1.33 GeV2/rad MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
θlow,down θhigh,down Finite Target Effects θhigh,up Router θlow,up Assume 5.5 mrads at upstream end of target, instead of center Rinner ztarg,up ztarg,center ztarg,down
Looking downstream φ=-360°/14 φ=+360°/14 ͢ B Bx By By Bx x r In this septant: By ~ Bφ Bx ~ Br φ y MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
GEANT4 • Moved to GDML geometry description • Defined hybrid and upstream toroids • Parameterized in same way as the TOSCA models MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
GEANT4 - Collimators MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014
GEANT4 – Acceptance definition MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 8,9 2014