1 / 18

COMM 250 Agenda - Week 4

COMM 250 Agenda - Week 4. Housekeeping Setting Grade Weights Then – Remaining Team Pictures – Back of Room If your team has changed, get another picture Remaining Team Names (?) Lecture Paradigms & Paradigm Shifts Epistemology, Ontology, Axiology Variables MTW-I: Acknowledgment

Download Presentation

COMM 250 Agenda - Week 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COMM 250 Agenda - Week 4 Housekeeping Setting Grade Weights Then – Remaining Team Pictures – Back of Room If your team has changed, get another picture Remaining Team Names (?) Lecture Paradigms & Paradigm Shifts Epistemology, Ontology, Axiology Variables MTW-I: Acknowledgment Research Questions & Hypotheses Operationalizing Variables

  2. The Philosophy of Science Epistemology – the Study of Knowledge • FBK: “relation of researcher to the topic” • Positivists: independent (objective knowledge) • Naturalists: interdependent (subjective) What is the Nature of Knowledge? • Is some/all knowledge “absolute?” • Is some/all knowledge “relative?”

  3. The Philosophy of Science Ontology – the Study of “Being” • FBK: “the nature of reality” • Positivists: the world is objective • Naturalists: the world is subjective What is the nature of “Being” ? • Beings as Passive: S-R Psychology, SMCR Communication • Beings as Active: Constructivism, Cognitive Psychology

  4. The Philosophy of Science Axiology – the Study of Values • FBK: “the role of values” • Positivists: science can be “value-free” • Naturalists: science is always “value-laden” What are the nature of “Values?” • Values – Are there objective values? (Is there “Truth” with a capital “T” ?) • Values – or subjective, depends upon who is deciding the values

  5. 4 Types of Variables Independent – influences another variable • IV = “Predictor” variable Dependent – variable influenced by another • DV = “Outcome” variable Control – variable one tries to control for • Either: “keep constant,” balance across groups, or extract in the statistical analysis (aka a “concomitant” variable) Extraneous – variable not studied/interested in • But it has some impact on the IV–DV relationship

  6. MTW I: Acknowledgment Acknowledgement is . . . • Personal • Powerful • A Contribution to Another Person • A Connection with Another Person • Simple • Satisfying • An Aid in Building “Team”

  7. MTW I: Acknowledgment Accepting Acknowledgement is . . . • Generous • Open • Honest • A Connection with Another Person • Simple • Allowing Another to Contribute to You

  8. In-Class Team Exercise # 4 Part I: Two rounds of Acknowledgment • Deliverable: No Written Deliverable • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional Team Work (if time permits) • Make Sure Team Picture is Current • Is your team name in?

  9. The Research Process Conceptualization • Start with / Develop a Theory and Develop Hypotheses Planning & Designing Research • Operationalize all Variables • i.e., How will you measure each variable? (must be precise!) Methods for Conducting Research • Plan the Study and Collect the Data Analyzing & Interpreting Data • Run Statistics and Interpret Results Re-Conceptualization • Back to the Drawing Board

  10. RQs and Hypotheses RQs • Open-ended, general • When researcher is unsure or new to the area • E.g.: “How does education level affect income? • Hypotheses • Predict a relationship • When researcher knows an area, or has a theory • E.g.: “The more education a person has, the higher his/her annual income.”

  11. RQs use Variables; Hs use IV, DV Independent – influences another variable • IV = “Predictor” variable Dependent – influenced by another • DV = “Outcome” variable Sample RQ: • “What is the relationship between education level and income? Sample H1: • “The more education a person has, the higher his/her annual income.

  12. RQs and Hypotheses RQs • Open-ended, general • When researcher is unsure or new to the area • “How does education level affect income? • Hypotheses • Predict a relationship • When researcher knows an area of has a theory • “The more education a person has, the higher their annual income.”

  13. Hypotheses Two-Tailed Hypotheses • Non-directional – researcher predicts a relationship, but does not specify the nature • “Education level is related to income.”

  14. . One-Tailed Hypotheses • Directional –predicts a relationship AND the direction of that relationship • “The more education a person has, the higher their annual income.”

  15. Operationalization Operational Definition • Defines a concept in observable / measurable terms • A scientist can propose/claim/offer virtually ANY operational definition of a concept – all he/she has to do is be able to defend it • So operational definitions must be: • Plausible (must make sense to most in the field) • Measurable (must be specified in detail) • Replicable (must be complete - so others can repeat)

  16. Examples of Operational Definitions Good (Defensible): • IQ = “score achieved on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale” Poor (Indefensible): • IQ = “how smart someone is” Good (Defensible): • Educ Level = “highest grade completed” Poor (Indefensible): • Educ Level = “total years in school”

  17. In-Class Team Exercise # 4 - Part II: First Do as Individuals, then produce a Team Version: 1) Create 2 Hypotheses(One 1-Tailed, One 2-Tailed) • Relate the concepts: “regular exercise” and “health” 2) Create a specific, measurable Operational Definition of each concept 3) Which is the IV, which the DV? 4) Propose 2 (likely/possible) “Intervening Variables” --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deliverable: a written version of the above

  18. Correlation & Causality Correlation • Two variables are related (as one varies, the other varies predictably) Causation 3 “Necessary & Sufficient” Conditions: • Two variables must be shown to be related • The IV must precede the DV in Time • The relationship cannot be due to another variable (an “Intervening” or “Confounding” variable)

More Related