1 / 14

Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: from theory to practice

The Policy Factor in Emerging Regional Hot-Spots: ‘good’ and bad factors to support high tech regions. Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: from theory to practice Den Bosch 19 May 2006 Patries Boekholt www.technopolis-group.com. This presentation.

cheryl
Download Presentation

Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: from theory to practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Policy Factor in Emerging Regional Hot-Spots: ‘good’ and bad factors to support high tech regions Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: from theory to practice Den Bosch 19 May 2006 Patries Boekholt www.technopolis-group.com

  2. This presentation • Focus on a particular type of region: a S&T based growth region or ‘hot-spot’ • Dutch study on EU regions • Success factors • Things to avoid • The role of policy on different levels • Policy lessons

  3. What is a hot-spot? • A regional agglomeration that manages to create added value and economic growth through a well networked ‘value chain’ ranging from knowledge creation to commercialisation and diffusion, in one or more technology based markets.

  4. Characterising the regions • Grenoble: a science & research city ‘pushed’ by the French central government, taken up by local actors and large companies Cambridge & Leuven: long history of top-research with relative recent attention and success in entrepreneurship and commercialisation of R&D • München & Helsinki: wealthy metropoles with important national nodes in science and business • Oulu: created hot-spot with Nokia as central player • Öresund: emerging trans-national hot-spot • Eindhoven region: industrial ‘technopole’ with Philips as centre • East- Netherlands: aspiring hot-spot with some niches

  5. Positioning of Regional Hot-Spots Public sector initiative East-Netherlands Øresund Grenoble München Cambridge Regionally led Nationally led Leuven Olou Helsinki Eindhoven Private sector initiative

  6. Success Factors (1) • Successful hot-spots have a combination of excellence in research, entrepreneurship and good framework conditions for high-tech starters • Active networks of local ‘champions’ who are spiders in the triple helix network • Critical mass of research excellence and linkages with locally based value chains that can turn this into a commercial success • Value chains: mostly key role for large corporations, in emerging technology areas: a large group of start-ups / research excellence attracting foreign investors

  7. Success Factors (2) • Framework conditions for the development of new (high-tech)businessincluding: • Seed and VC funds • Strong incubation support attached to research centres • Professional technology transfer and incubation climate and business support for new entrepreneurs • Focus and vision building on 1- 3 technology/market combinations (and stimulating cross fertilization between these themes) • The role of policy has not always been decisive but in many case they have played a facilitating role

  8. Practices to avoid • Expectations that investments in R&D institutions alone will automatically ‘spill-over’ to the economic fabric: Excellence in science and research alone is not sufficient • Copy models that have worked elsewhere without contextual adaptations • NOT choosing policy priorities • Or choose generic thematic areas that are on every one’s policy agenda (for over a decade e.g. Bio-tech, ICT) instead find unique niches • Choose a too narrow focus on one technology area or market and thus risking lock-ins • Expect quick results and easy wins

  9. What policy levels played a decisive role?

  10. Typical roles/initiatives of regional/local actors • Support of start-ups (intern in universities, incubators, through management support, seed- en venture capital) • Local technology transfer initiatives • Creation of networks and platforms • Infrastructure: business en science parks • Develop a common medium / long term vision and action plan • Regional/city marketing

  11. Typical role of national governments • By means of Science & Technology policy: create and support critical mass of scientific excellence and human capital (intended and unintended) • Create framework conditions: from infrastructure to regulation • In some countries: stimulate competition between regions and encourage coherent vision • Few countries have explicit policies for ‘hot-spots’ • Trend in ‘Nordic’ countries, France and UK: regionalising innovation policy through shifts in the ‘governance’ and reallocation of resources

  12. Role of EU thus far in the background • Structural Funds not applicable in these examples in almost all cases • Enabled potential hot-spots (e.g. South-Brabant) to enter into a process of strategic decision making and building of ‘Triple Helix’ type networks (e.g. RITTS/RIS, Intereg, Regions of Knowledge) • Stimulates cross-border networking to enable high-tech clusters at a larger scale • In future: possibilities to involve regional cluster initiatives in Technology Platforms and Joint Technology Initiatives (JTI)

  13. Can hot-spots be created (by policy)? • Policy definitely has a role to play BUT is not a sufficient condition. • Aspects to take into account: • Timing:take the growth wave • Path dependency: all cases had structural strengths that go back some decades • Tenacity:long termstrategy: don’t expect quick fixes • In many cases: lots of (public) moneyfrom multiple sources • Find the unique selling point

  14. What policy lessons can we learn? • There is no single blueprint for a hot-spot and no ‘recipe’ how to create them • A good interaction between national, regional and local is essential: policy coordination • Stimulate ‘triple helix’ networks in the regions • Without local champions with self-organising capacities, national policies will not achieve much • Investment in critical S&T assets of sufficient critical mass • Strengthen the ‘governance’ at regional and local level • Enable the process of collective vision building • Choose for a focus in one or two key areas but not too narrowly defined • Entrepreneurship: instigated from the local level with strong involvement of universities, research centres and colleges • Don’t expect immediate impacts: it’s a long term strategy

More Related