1 / 23

The role of wages in European Economic Governance

The role of wages in European Economic Governance. CAWIE project Brussels, November 2012 rjanssen@etuc.org. Three different views. Absolute priority for competitiveness : Wages need to do nothing else but to promote competitiveness  in each and every single country

yetta
Download Presentation

The role of wages in European Economic Governance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The role of wages in European Economic Governance CAWIE project Brussels, November 2012 rjanssen@etuc.org

  2. Threedifferentviews • Absolutepriority for competitiveness : Wagesneed to do nothingelse but to promotecompetitiveness in each and every single country • Wagesfonctioning as communicating barrels • Wages have different masters (objectives) to serve. ‘Competitiveness’ isjust one of them

  3. The first view: «Competitiveness to rule all of us» • Wheredoesthisview come from ? • Inspired by or based on tenyears of wage stagnation in Germany: • 2000 – 2008: • Zero unit wagecosts • Falling real wages (particularlyoutspoken for lowwageearners)

  4. Unit wagecost 2000 = 100

  5. Following the Germanlead • These figures are thenused to claim thatworkers in many countries have livedbeyondtheirmeans…. • In technicalterms, wages have increasedfasterthanproductivity… • This thenneeds to becorrected. Competitivenessthatwaslostneeds to beregained. • Sincewecannotdevalue the currencyanymore, let us devaluewages (the « internal » devaluation)

  6. What techniques to arrive at a ‘wagedevaluation’ ? • Again, inspiration isfound in Germany • Reversal of the hierarchy of bargaining (‘Pforzheim’ type agreementsallowing to strikecompanylevelwage/employment deals) • Longer workingweek • Underminewage standards by doubtful ‘trade unions’ • Longer workinghourswithout more pay In Greece, Spain, Portugal, measureslikethese have already been taken • In France, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, discussions on thesemeasures are gaining traction

  7. Bad karaoke • DGB and itssectoraffiliatesdidsee to ‘checks and balances’ • Companyopening clause agreements: Only if wage concessions are temporary, only in return for investment or job guarantees, strict monitoring of companylevelagreements • « Yellow » trade unions: Recentvictories (agencywork deals) by DGB in labour courts • Longer workinghours: rejected by sometrade unions • These « checks and balances » now tend to getignored by the rest of Europe

  8. « AlleMenschenwerdenKonkurrenten »: Whyitiswrong • « Fallacy of composition »: The effect of a policyapplied by one country iscompletelydifferentfrom the effectwhen all countries go for the samething • Estimates of elacticity of exports to real exchange rate muchlowerwhenestimated for the entire Euro Area (minus 0.26) than for individual countries takenseparately (between -0.54 and -0.77 for big 4) • Reason : When all go for wagemoderation, relative cost positions do not change whereas export demand perspectives getdepressed (One country’sdomesticdemandisanothercountry’s export perspectives)

  9. The second view: Wages as communicating barrels • A variant of the previousview • This view has no problemwith the factthatthatwagesshouldbemoderated/cut in the periphery, providedwages in the core go up. • «  If youwanthigherwageincreases in Germany, youshouldalsoacceptlowwerwages in Spain »

  10. Illustrating the « central planification of wages »

  11. One problem: Arithmetics are killing

  12. Will (wage) reflation end up in ‘deficit’ countries ? • Portugal is not Germany : Bigdifferences in economic and industrial structure, with Germany producing more sophisticatedproducts for special ‘niche’ markets (machinery, telecom infrastructure, transport infrastructure,…): Wages do not playsuch a bigrolehere • Europe is an integratedmarketplace but the integrationbetween Germany and the Euro peripheryis not somuchoutspoken: Imports from IT, ES, PT, GR onlyrepresent 5% of German GDP. • Implications: Revival of wages/demand in Germany: • Good, necessary and long overdue for Germanworkers … • …but doubtfulthatitwillreally end up in those Euro Area countries thatneeditmost

  13. Ignore balance sheetrecessionsatyourownperil • ‘Deficit’ countries tend to have a high public debt but an evenhigherprivatedebt. This does change things. • Wagedevaluations have the key objective of reducing nominal values (nominal wages, prices, perhapsevenrents…) • With nominal value of debtremainingfixed, thismeans real value of debt shoots upwards.(Real interest rates increase). • In turn, households and companies have to pay an increasingshare of theirincome to servicingexistingdebt, squeezingeven more demandfrom the economy.

  14. Danger of things running out of control

  15. The thirdview: Wages have multiple objectives to pursue • Stability of revenue (not giving the employer the right to cut nominal wages) • Stability of prices (contribute to low inflation and preventdeflation) • Engine for demand, growth and thus jobs • An actor for fairness: A fair distribution of incomebetween capital and labour (no excessive profits) • An actor for modernisation of the economy (pushingemployers to innovateinstead of cuttingwages)

  16. StabilityPrinciple • Wage trends (not every single year!) to beseenagainst the increase in productivity plus the ECB’s inflation target of 2% • Would show, for example, that minimum wages in France and indexation system in Belgium are NOT a problem

  17. Look at French line: Exactly on the ECB’s inflation target

  18. Upwardsrebalancing • « Surplus » countries still have 15% to catch up (on top of productivity plus 2% ECB inflation target)

  19. Look at the otherside of the coin • Evolution of profits

  20. All isgoing down….except profit rates

  21. …whileinvestmentisgoing down as well

  22. Return on Equity

  23. Profit Monitoring Group • Level of profits (share of profits in GDP/ level of Return on Equity Capital) • What are profits beingused for ? Investment? Dividens? Capital BuyBacks? Bonuses for CEO’s? • Are, at the very least paying, ‘decent’ taxes beingpaid on corporate profits ?

More Related