180 likes | 197 Views
Diaspora’s participation in homeland development Dajci and Hoti cases. Dr. Bresena Kopliku University of Shkodra Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Geography bkopliku@unishk.edu.al. Research questions.
E N D
Diaspora’s participation in homeland development Dajci and Hoti cases Dr. Bresena Kopliku University of Shkodra Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Geography bkopliku@unishk.edu.al
Research questions How migrants’ community from Dajc and Hot has been engaged to invest in the home country? What actions have been undertaken to create a friendly environment for diaspora’s contribution? Why the mobilization of diaspora in Dajc may be considered as a success story? Under what circumstances can be reached out the sustainability of the model?
Methodology • Key informants in depth interviews • Dom ArdianArra (former priest of Dajc, actual priest of Hot) • ArbenGjuraj (former head of Dajc commune) • ValbonaKarakaci (DLDP Program Manager) • Focus group meeting with returnees • 6 returnees from Italy in Dajc • Entrepreneurs in decorative plants, wood processing industry, dairy, farming • Questionnaires with diaspora members
Theoretical approach • Diaspora and transnational approaches emphasize intense connections to national or local territories, especially in the case of migrants. • Scholars using the term “diaspora” often refer to a multi-generational pattern (Hoti case), while transnational analysts deal with recent migrant flows (Dajci case) .
“Social remittances into the equation”(Levitt, Lamba-Nieves 2011)
Dajci Case Hoti case Historic Diaspora Few escapees after 1960– mainly USA After 1991 – USA, Canada, Australia, England. According to informal statistics there are more Albanians from Hot in America than in Hot. Few return migrants • Recent Diaspora – after 1992 – mainly Italy • 1992 – 1996 • 2011 – 2015 – USA, Canada • Chain migration – Firenze (“If you see an Albanian in Pistoia, he is for sure from Dajc”) • 9.557 Albanians in Pistoia • Strong sense of community • 2006 - Return Migration
Diaspora Involvement Hoti Road infrastructure Multifunctional centre in Rapshe Conference for Hot in USA and Albania “Hoti ne rrjedhat e shekujve” The first ever church reconstructed in Albania after 1990 Existing church in USA (a place to gather and discuss) Daic • Alba Migrantes Association – established in 2004 • - 18 roads paved- rehabilitation of old monuments- Scientific Conference “Afer dhe larg” - help during the floods- employment of the non migrants community
The role of migrants’ community • Being a financial partner; • Taking part in the decision making process (where to invest, demand explanations on the money spent); • Maintaining not only economic but also sentimental ties with the home country; • Transferring knowledge and technology and acting as trade intermediaries; • Setting up enterprises;
Villages and towns of migrants’ origin can benefit from the multiplier effects of ‘collective remittances’, ‘development through migration’ process. (King, Frykman, Vullnetari 2013: 129)
Co-development strategy(King. Lulle 2006) • Collective social remittances not only strongly affect what organizations do but also how they do it. • Field of action in the migration development nexus • The right synergy of actors in the conditions of skepticism toward formal ways of investments. • Replication of the model in the support of other projects.
Sustainability of the model • Dajc – investments for practical reasons (the idea of return). • From investments in infrastructure to the set – up of enterprises involving the community. • Investments to generate incomes and to employ the non-migrant community. • Dajci case is a best practice of engaging diaspora in a local level. • 776 returnees – mainly from Italy • Limited examples of transnational economic activities and stable links • Imported ideas and activities from Italy: • Cultivation of decorative plants • Trade of construction materials; • Wood processing; • Opening of catering services; • Small markets, car services, sun houses and metal construction; • Live breeding; • Food industry (meat and dairy).
Sustainability of the model • Hot – investments mostly as an obligation to the home country. • Investments for the vulnerable social groups (elderly people, children, youngsters). • Transnational pensioners – last proofs of fading bonds to the homeland. • Yet, youngsters planning to migrate in both villages.
Some questionnaires’ quotations • “First, diaspora should be taken seriously”. • “there is no meritocracy”. • “safety, just safety”. • “we can go everywhere for holidays, but we still come here, even though my whole family is abroad”. • “Albania is like a magnet, we come here and spend the triple…”.
Need for policy implications • To scale up the process on a regional or national level; • Consider diaspora as a mechanism to foster development; • Channel investments through formal processes; • For Transparency and Trust - Migrants managed to get successfully engaged because they trusted the actors involved in the process; • Facilitate migrants’ investments – returnees or diaspora; • Engage diaspora in economic, social, political or cultural debate in the home country;
Thank you! • Bruneau, Michel. 2010. ‘Diasporas, Transnational Spaces and Communities’. In Diaspora and Transnationalism. Concepts, Theories and Methods, IMISCOE Research, Amsterdam University Press, 35–50. • Carling, Jorgen, and Marta BivandErdal. 2014. ‘Connections between Return Migration and Transnationalism’. International Migration 52(6): 2–12. • Decentralization and Local Development Programme. 2008. Strategic Development Plan of Dajc Commune. Afrojdit. • Faist, Thomas. 2000. The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Faist, Thomas. 2010. ‘Diaspora and Transnationalism: What Kind of Dance Partners?’ In Diaspora and Transnationalism. Concepts, Theories and Methods, IMISCOE Research, Amsterdam University Press, 9–34. • King, Russell, MajaPovrzanovićFrykman, and Julie Vullnetari. 2013. ‘Migration, Transnationalism and Development on the Southeastern Flank of Europe’. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 13(2): 125–40. • King, Russell, and Anastasia Christou. 2010. ‘Cultural Geographies of Diaspora, Migration and Transnationalism: Perspectives from the Study of Second Generation Returnees’. Population, Space and Place 15(2): 103–19. • Markova, Eugenia. 2015. Economic and Social Effects of Migration on Sending Countries: The Cases of Albania and Bulgaria. The World Bank. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/4/38528396.pdf. • Glick Schiller, Nina, and Linda Basch. 1995. ‘From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration’. Anthropological Quarterly, George Washington Institute for Ethnographic Research: 48–63. • Oruc, Nermin et al. 2013. Linking Rural Entrepreuneurs and Diaspora in Albania and Bosnia-Herzegovina. CEDAR; RRPP; ACSER. • Paladini, Cristiana. 2014. ‘Circular Migration and New Forms of Citizenship. The Albanian Community’s Redefinition of Social Inclusion Patterns’. European Journal of Research on Education 2(6): 109–15. • Van Hear, Nicholas. 2014. ‘Diaspora Formation’. In Migration: A COMPAS Anthology, Oxford: COMPAS. • Vertovec, Steven. 2002. ‘Transnational Networks and Skilled Labour Migration’. In WPTC-02-02, Ladenburg. • Weinar, Agnieszka. 2010. ‘Instrumentalising Diasporas for Development: International and European Policy Discourses’. In Diaspora and Transnationalism. Concepts, Theories and Methods, IMISCOE Research, Amsterdam University Press, 73–90. • Schiller Glick N, Basch L (1995) From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration In: Anthropological Quarterly, George Washington Institute for Ethnographic Research, p. 48-63 • Russel King, AijaLulle (2016) Research on Migration: Facing Realities and Maximising Opportunities, A policy review,European Commission • Peggy Levitt & Deepak Lamba-Nieves (2011): Social Remittances Revisited, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37:1, 1-22 Routledge