100 likes | 251 Views
DARS/CAS Implementation Status Update Audit Committee – March 19, 2008. John Asmussen, CPA, CIA, CISA, MBA Executive Director, Office of Internal Auditing Beth Buse, CPA, CISA, CIA, GSEC Deputy Director, Office of Internal Auditing. DARS and CAS - Background.
E N D
DARS/CAS Implementation Status UpdateAudit Committee – March 19, 2008 John Asmussen, CPA, CIA, CISA, MBA Executive Director, Office of Internal Auditing Beth Buse, CPA, CISA, CIA, GSEC Deputy Director, Office of Internal Auditing
DARS and CAS - Background • DARS – Degree Audit Reporting System • Degree Audits • CAS – Course Applicability System • On-line tool for determining course transfer information. • October 2007 - reported 26 of 37 colleges and universities has not fully implemented • Board approved motion in November 2007 requiring colleges and universities to implement by 12/31/07 or have an implementation plan approved by Senior Vice Chancellor and Audit Committee Chair.
DARS and CAS - Approval of College and University Implementation Plans • 14 of 26 colleges and universities planned for a 12/31/07 implementation date. • 12 institutions requested extensions past 12/31/07 • Extension requests approved on February 10, 2008
System-wide Summary of DARS and CAS Implementation – As of August 2007 Legend: - Substantially Implemented – Partially Implemented - Not Implemented
System-wide Summary of DARS and CAS Implementation – As of February 2008 Legend: - Substantially Implemented – On track to implement by June 30, 2008
DARS and CAS - Implementation Status as of February 2008 • December 31, 2007 implementation date • 13 of the 14 colleges and universities met the date • MSU Moorhead needs to establish additional course equivalencies. • 3 additional institutions have fully implemented • All others on track to be fully implemented by June 30, 2008
DARS and CAS – Full Implementation Definition • Clarification of what is meant by full implementation • Significant variances exist on when the different components of DARS were implemented at each institution, these components include: • Academic programs encoded, • Course equivalencies defined, • Transfer-in courses entered, and • Academic Exceptions entered. • Usefulness of DARS is a product of current usage and when all components were implemented.
DARS and CAS – Full Implementation Definition continued • On July 1, 2008: • All new students and all students newly entering a major will have a reliable ‘degree audit’. • NOT all current students will have reliable ‘degree audits’. • Some institutions have a substantial backlog of transfer-in courses and academic exceptions to record that were accepted in prior years. • Student transparency considerations • Institutions need to alert students that ‘degree audits’ may not be reliable. • Institutions should have a mechanism in place for students to request that past transactions be recorded. • Academic and Student Affairs division should consider setting a future target date when all currently enrolled students will have reliable ‘degree audits’.
– Information Technology Issues • Adequate IT Support • No dedicated IT support for three years. • Three failed searches. • Search in progress • E-Transcript • Facilitate electronic transmission of transfer transcripts from institutions. • Delayed for several years • ITS Division committed to complete by September 2008
Office of Internal Auditing… … A catalyst for improvement www.internalauditing.mnscu.edu 651-296-3471