1 / 8

Information Technology Projects

Information Technology Projects. Legislative Audit Bureau October 2007. Executive Branch Agencies and IT Projects Reviewed. Large, High-Risk, Ongoing Projects. 22 projects, as of July 1, 2006 Each has costs of $1.0 million or more Total projected costs of $186.4 million.

chesna
Download Presentation

Information Technology Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Information Technology Projects Legislative Audit Bureau October 2007

  2. Executive Branch Agencies and IT Projects Reviewed

  3. Large, High-Risk, Ongoing Projects • 22 projects, as of July 1, 2006 • Each has costs of $1.0 million or more • Total projected costs of $186.4 million

  4. Projected Costs of Large, High-Risk, Ongoing Projects

  5. Case Study Projects • DOT: Registration and Titling System • DOR: Sales and Use Tax Software • DWD: SUITES • DWD: EnABLES • DOA: Server Consolidation; E-mail Consolidation; and IBIS

  6. Recommendations for DOA • Collaboration with executive branch agencies; • Enhanced project monitoring; and, • Policies and procedures to guide the use of master lease financing for IT projects.

  7. Recommendation to the Legislature To enhance oversight of large, high-risk executive branch IT projects, consider reactivating: • the Joint Committee on Information Policy and Technology • the Information Technology Management Board

  8. Information Technology Projects Legislative Audit Bureau October 2007

More Related