EVAAS, Teacher Effectiveness Reports, and Teacher Evaluation

1. EVAAS, Teacher Effectiveness Reports, and Teacher Evaluation November 2012

2. Outcomes Participants will • Review 2012-2013 Teacher Effectiveness timeline. • 2011-2012 reports (formative year) • End-of-year testing and MSL/Common Exams • Communication Plan/Next Steps • Identify the Teacher Effectiveness/Value Added report features. • Discuss implications for Standard VI in the Teacher Evaluation System.

3. Why is the EVAAS Teacher Effectiveness/Value Added Report Important? Beginning with the 2012-2013 report, it becomes part of the teacher’s evaluation. • Standard 6 – Teachers contribute to the academic success of their students. (Measurable Progress) • Standard 5 – Teachers reflect on their practice. • Teacher analyze student learning. • Standard 4 – Teachers facilitate learning for their students • Teachers plan instruction appropriate for their students • Use data for short and long range planning

4. Human Resources - Accountability Collaboration HR Testing Manages MSL/Common Exams, EOG, and EOC training, administration, scanning, & reporting Trains on evaluation instrument and Standard VI Ensures data quality Explains purpose of MSLs/Common Exams Manages district-wide and principal EVAAS accounts Manages McREL evaluation tool

5. Timeline: Teacher Effectiveness Reports Nov 8-15 Communication activities with teachers • October 2012 • Principal access to • EVAAS Reports ≈ November 13 Teachers receive automated email with login information. Unique ID required for access Principal sole user with report access. Teacher list based on 2011-2012 school assignment EVAAS Teacher Effectiveness/Value added Report and Standard VI yearly “rating” 2012-2013 timeline for Standard Six (rating and status) Report resources on Testing website Teacher accounts based on data in McREL/NCWISE Unique ID required for access

6. Timeline: Teacher Effectiveness Reports Winter Teacher 2012 Standard VI “Rating” populated in McREL May/June Student Verification Process available in EVAAS May/June Schools administer EOGs, EOCs, CTE Exams and MSL/CE Rating populated (2011-2012-Formative year) Teacher verifies students taught Principal approves verification list Teacher reviews principal approval/edits DPI verifies 70/140 day membership MSL/CE schedule TBD EOG/EOC Achievement Level delay MSL/CE scores for Teacher Effect only (No reports available except for HS exam scores)

7. Spring 2013 MSL Implementation: High School

8. Spring 2013 MSL Implementation: Elementary and Middle • Science and Social Studies MSLs are administered for teachers who do not teach EOG courses.

9. Changes in EVAAS Reporting Above Exceeds Expected Growth Not Detectably Different Meets Expected Growth Below Does Not Meet Expected Growth 2010-2011 Beginning 2011-2012

10. Effectiveness Levels Exceeds Expected Growth Index is 2 or higher Index is equal to or greater than a -2 but less than +2 Meets Expected Growth 0.0 Does Not Meet Expected Growth Index is less than -2

11. Reports Available for Each Course Teacher estimate: An indicator of how much a teacher influences the academic progress of the students. Index: Ratio of Estimate to Standard Error

12. Student List

13. Individual Student Data

14. Teacher Progress v State

15. Teacher Diagnostic

16. Teacher Composite

17. School Composite