1 / 9

St.Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009 Leniency Programme – Access to File, Discovery Rules

St.Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009 Leniency Programme – Access to File, Discovery Rules. Vladimíra Glatzová, Glatzová & Co. Importance of Confidentiality for Leniency. Confidentiality - condition sine qua non for L eniency. Two R isks of L eakage of I nformation:

Download Presentation

St.Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009 Leniency Programme – Access to File, Discovery Rules

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. St.Martin Conference 2009November 12, 2009Leniency Programme – Access to File, Discovery Rules • Vladimíra Glatzová, Glatzová & Co.

  2. Importance of Confidentiality for Leniency • Confidentiality - condition sine qua non for Leniency. • Two Risks of Leakage of Information: • leakage of information on leniency proceedings to other cartel members • leakage of information about cartel to consumers

  3. Leniency Proceedings Leniency Application Opening of Administrative Proceedings (opening of the file) Dawn-rides (místní šetření) Statement of Objections (sdělení výhrad)

  4. Confidentiality of Leniency Documents • Access to File • When? • Opening of proceedings • By whom? • Participants to proceedings • Third parties with legal interest • Content of File - Corporate Statement excluded until SO, - Business secret entirely excluded from file

  5. Conflict with Discovery Rules Discovery Rules incriminating Leniency documents might be requested in private civil actions for damage namely USA (+England and Wales, Germany)  hamper effectiveness of Leniency Programme potential economic harms in the form of damages x economic benefit of Leniency Programme

  6. Conflict with Discovery Rules 2 Consequence  Oral Leniency attempt to frustrate discovery requests Possible solution of conflict – application of Principle of International Comity possible exemption of Leniency documents from discovery based on Rule 26 current downsides: inconsistency of interpretation of the principle by courts

  7. Conclusion 1 Relevant changes in Czech legislation to be adopted to secure confidentiality: access to file only after SO no access for third parties

  8. Conclusion 2 Consistency in application and interpretation of the Principle of International Comity to be ensured

  9. Thank you for listening!Glatzova & Co., v.o.sHusova 5, Praha 1vladimira.glatzova@glatzova.com

More Related