350 likes | 529 Views
Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy. Predictive Molecular Markers: Hormone Receptor Status Presented by Kathleen I Pritchard Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and The University of Toronto Toronto, Canada. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS.
E N D
Prognostic and Predictive Factors: Current Evidence for Individualized Therapy Predictive Molecular Markers: Hormone Receptor Status Presented by Kathleen I Pritchard Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and The University of Toronto Toronto, Canada
PROGNOSTIC FACTORS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FACTORS WHICH PREDICT THE RISK OF RECURRENCE OR DEATH INDEPENDENT OF THERAPY
PREDICTIVE FACTORS PREDICTIVE FACTORS FACTORS WHICH PREDICT THE LIKELIHOOD OF RESPONSE TO A GIVEN THERAPY
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR BOTH PREDICTIVE AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR EXPRESSED IN 60-70% OF BREAST CANCERS A WEAK BUT FAVOURABLE PROGNOSTIC FACTOR
ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR OBJECTIVE RESPONSE RATE
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR RESPONSE RATES INCREASE WITH INCREASING LEVELS OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PROTEIN WITLIFF 1988
ER AND PgR MEASUREMENT METHODS LIGAND BINDING OR BIOCHEMICAL DONE ON A “SLURRY” OF TISSUE YIELDS AN AVERAGE VALUE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DONE ON A SECTION CAN LOCALIZE RECEPTOR 1-10% OF CELLS STAINING STILL POSITIVE
COMPARISON OF ER AND/OR PgR IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL METHODS TO OLDER LIGAND BINDING OR BIOCHEMICAL METHODS EXCELLENT REVIEW BY CRAIG ALLRED et al MODERN PATHOLOGY 1998; 11 (2): 155-168 STRESSES VALIDATION OF NEW TEST METHODOLOGY WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME AS WELL AS WITH OLDER TEST METHODOLOGY
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR IHC PREPARATION OF TISSUE TYPES OF ANTIBODIES ARBITRARY SCORING INTERPRETATION REPORTING
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR LB = LIGAND ASSAY BINDING IHC = IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL IHC and LB 80-90% CONCORDANT
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF ER BY IHC ~ 10-15% RECURRENCE/SURVIVAL BENEFIT IN WOMEN WHO DO NOT RECEIVE HORMONAL ADJUVANT THERAPY CONFIRMED IN AT LEAST FOUR TRIALS INVOLVING UNTREATED WOMEN
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ER BY IHC 20 STUDIES 1200 WOMEN ER +ve ~ 70% RR ER -ve < 15% RR
PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR PG-R AN ER-RELATED GENE PRODUCT INDICATES WHETHER THE ESTROGEN / E.R. REGULATED PATHWAYS ARE INTACT
PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR LB vs IHC ~ 70% CONCORDANCE IHC RR PgR +ve 70% PgR-ve < 10%
PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR IHC TISSUE PREPARATION TYPES OF ANTIBODIES SCORING INTERPRETATION REPORTING
PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR WEAK PROGNOSTIC FACTOR ~ 5% DIFFERENCE IN 713 UNTREATED WOMEN
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF RECEPTORS PHENOTYPE INCIDENCE RESPONSE RATE ER + PgR+ 58% 77% ER + PgR- 23% 27% ER - PgR+ 4% 46% ER - PgR- 15% 11% McGuire 1991
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY PROPOSED AS A PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR CHEMOTHERAPY RESPONSE ER -ve MORE LIKELY TO RESPOND TO CHEMO LIPPMAN ET AL NEJM 1978
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR CHEMOTHERAPY SUBSEQUENTLY REJECTED AS A PREDICTIVE FACTOR BASED ON CONTRADICTORY DATA FROM A SERIES OF SMALL STUDIES IN METASTATIC DISEASE
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR AC vs AC T DIFFERENCE MAINLY IN ER -ve LITTLE DIFFERENCE IN ER +ve HENDERSON ET AL ASCO 2000
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR OXFORD OVERVIEW SUGGESTION IN SOME ANALYSES THAT WOMEN WITH ER NEGATIVE TUMOURS BENEFIT MORE FROM CHEMOTHERAPY COLE, LANCET 2001 COATES, LANCET 1998
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION DIRECTLY RELATED TO EFFECTS OF ESTROGEN ER A NUCLEAR RECEPTOR FUNCTIONS AS A TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CONTROLLING ESTROGEN RELATED GENES
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS LIGAND BINDING RECEPTOR CONFORMATION INTERACTION OF RECONFORMED RECEPTOR WITH COREGULATORS RESPONSE ELEMENTS IN PROMOTOR REGIONS OF TARGET GENES (ERE) ALL CONTRIBUTES TO NET ESTROGENIC EFFECTS IN A CELL
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS POLYPEPTIDE GROWTH FACTORS AND THEIR MEMBRANE RECEPTORS ALSO CONTRIBUTE TO BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION SIGNALS THROUGH VARIOUS PROTEIN KINASE PATHWAYS ENHANCE CELL SURVIVAL AND PROLIFERATION
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS THESE PATHWAYS ALSO INTERACT WITH ESTROGEN RECEPTOR KINASES IN GROWTH FACTOR CASCADE CAN PHOSPHORYLATE AND ACTIVATE ER ER IN TURN ACTIVATES AND AUGMENTS SIGNALING IN GROWTH FACTOR PATHWAYS
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS SIGNALING THROUGH GF PATHWAYS MAY CONTRIBUTE TO HORMONAL RESISTANT STATES BY LIGAND - INDEPENDENT ACTIVATION OF ER THUS TARGETING GF PATHWAYS IN ADDITION TO ER MAY PROVIDE BETTER THERAPY
ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MECHANISMS CLASSIC HORMONAL THERAPIES BIOLOGIC AGENTS ANTI HER-2 HERCEPTIN OTHERS ANTI EGF IRESSA OTHERS
PREDICTIVE MOLECULAR MARKERS: HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUSCONCLUSIONS STILL CRUCIAL IN SELECTION OF HORMONAL THERAPY MEASUREMENTS MUST BE STANDARDIZED TISSUE PREPARATON ANTIBODY USED SCORING INTERPRETATION REPORTING
PREDICTIVE MOLECULAR MARKERS: HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUSQUESTIONS ?ER / PgR ROLE IN SELECTING CHEMOTHERAPY ?Her 2 - Neu ROLE IN SELECTING CHEMOTHERAPY ROLE IN SELECTING HORMONAL THERAPY ?EGF - R (Erb - B1) ROLE IN SELECTING THERAPY
PREDICTIVE MOLECULAR MARKERS: HORMONE RECEPTOR STATUSQUESTIONS ?OPTIMAL USE OF COMBINATIONS OF CLASSIC HORMONAL AND BIOLOGIC FACTORS ?OPTIMAL GUIDANCE OF THIS COMBINED THERAPY BY CAREFUL STANDARDIZATION OF LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS