1 / 21

AOD analysis for DC2 SUSY sample.

AOD analysis for DC2 SUSY sample. Pavel Zarzhitsky SMU. Introduction. DC2 has a new SUSY point in the coannihilation region. The parameters of the point are: m 0 =70; m 1/2 =350; A 0 =0; tan ß =10.0 ; sgn( μ )=+; m top =175.

ciara-allison
Download Presentation

AOD analysis for DC2 SUSY sample.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AOD analysis for DC2 SUSY sample. Pavel Zarzhitsky SMU

  2. Introduction. • DC2 has a new SUSY point in the coannihilation region. The parameters of the point are: • m0=70; m1/2=350; A0=0; tanß=10.0 ; sgn(μ)=+; mtop=175. • The coannihilation point is in a region that is favored if SUSY is to explain dark matter. LSP is almost degenerate with sleptons. It is close to point 5 in TDR, but there are some mass differences that need to be taken into account. • I performed some standard analysis using AOD’s, produced using full simulated data. The data contain no noise.

  3. Data production. • 400,000 events were produced and digitized. The digitized data files located at /usatlas/magdacache001/ common/doyen/A9_digi/ • All events are made without noise. • AOD analysis job takes ~20 min for 100000 events on 1.5 GHz CPU. • To analyze AOD use a sample Athena packages PhysicsAnalysis/SUSYPhys/SUSYPhysAlgs, PhysicsAnalysis/SUSYPhys/SUSYPhysUtils, PhysicsAnalysis/SUSYPhys/SUSYPhysUser.

  4. Physics process. The leading processes in coannihilation region give squark that can decay through producing slow leptons: The similar process for tau’s is given by: Slow leptons are produced from following sources:

  5. Leptons pT distribution. pT distribution for all electrons. pT distribution for all muons.

  6. Leptons pT distribution. pT for leading and soft electrons pT for leading and soft muons leading e second e leading muon second muon pT distribution for leading and soft electrons that are used to calculate dilepton invariant mass. pT distribution for leading and soft muons that are used to calculate dilepton invariant mass.

  7. opposite sign same sign Invariant mass of e-e and μ-μ pairs. Invariant mass for electron pair. Invariant mass for muon pair. opposite sign same sign These are invariant mass plots for electrons and muons separately. As you can see there is an excess of electrons with low invariant mass. Almost all of these low mass events have two soft electrons. Used cuts are on the next slide.

  8. Electrons with low inv mass. • As you could see on the previous slide there is an excess of electrons with low invariant mass. These events have following properties: • We have low mass events for the same charge and opposite charge electrons. • Almost all of these low mass events have two soft electrons. • Both electrons in the pair are very close to each other in space. Plots with eta and phi differences for electron pairs with low invariant mass are on the next slide. • We believe that these low mass events are caused by fake electrons from e-gamma conversion and photon emission. Both these processes will produce two adjacent clusters in the calorimeter and one track associated with them. And this is the case.

  9. Electrons with low inv mass. These 2 plots show difference in eta and phi between electrons in pair with invariant mass < 5GeV. As you see, they are very close to each other.

  10. Electrons η distribution. Invariant mass for electron pair. eta for all electrons passed ET and jet cuts eta for all electrons used for inv mass calculation eta for electrons with inv mass < 5GeV Electrons have a strange behavior in a transition region. There are two peaks at eta +-1.5, especially for electrons with low invariant mass.

  11. not cleaned sample cleaned sample Invariant mass of e-e pair. Invariant mass for electron pair. The electron sample was clean by requirement that distance between any two electrons must be >0.2 in eta and >0.2 in phi. From two adjacent electrons the one with highest pT was left in the sample. On the plot you can see a comparison of e-e invariant mass with and without cleaning.

  12. other from at 100 GeV. Dilepton endpoint. Invariant mass for lepton pair. • xET>300 GeV • 2 SF/OS leptons Pt>10 GeV • >=1 jets with Pt>150 GeV • Opposite sign/ Opposite flavor subtraction applied • events with invariant mass < 5GeV are eliminated to remove electrons with low invariant mass • Two endpoints are expected. One from at 67 GeV. The Compare with TDR plots 20-9 and 20-10.

  13. Pt for taus. pT for leading and soft taus leading tau second tau pT distribution for leading and soft taus that are used to calculate tau-tau invariant mass. pT distribution for all taus.

  14. opposite sign same sign Tau inv mass. Invariant mass for tau pair. • This is the same lepton pair invariant mass for two opposite sign taus. • xET>300 GeV; • 1 tau pT > 40 GeV, • 1 tau pT > 25 GeV; • >= 1 jet with pT > 100 GeV, >= 1 jets with • pT > 40 GeV;

  15. Jet ll inv mass. • Using two leptons and a jet we can form invariant mass of a squark. This is for: • at least four jets with pT1>100 GeV, pT2,3,4 > 50 GeV; • Meff > 400 GeV; • Etmiss > max(100 GeV, 0.2 Meff ); • Two opposite sign leptons with pT > 10 GeV. • The lepton pair was combined with two hardest jets. The smaller invariant mass is on the plot. It must be smaller then the four body endpoint for squark. Mllqmax = 609 GeV. Compare to TDR Fig. 20-20. The larger invariant mass should give the same endpoint on the left edge.

  16. no cut cut 1 cut 2 no cut cut 1 cut 2 Jet ll inv mass. Smaller of the two e+ e- q masses. Only electrons are included. Smaller of the two μ μ q masses. Only muons are included. cut1 means Mll < 67 GeV; cut2 means Mll < 100 GeV.

  17. no cut cut 1 cut 2 Jet ll inv mass. OF/OS leptons subtracted. It is not clear that the endpoint is at 609 GeV. Smaller of the two l+ l- q masses.

  18. Summary. • AOD production for DC2 is working. • For coannihilation point two endpoints in l-l invariant mass can be clearly seen. • There is a problem with excess of soft electrons with low invariant mass that is correlated with two peaks in eta. • More work is needed to understand endpoints in jet-l-l invariant mass.

  19. Effective mass. • This is so called effective mass plot. • Meff=pT1+pT2+pT3+pT4+Etmiss • where pTi are for 4 hardest jets in the event. • xET>100 GeV • 4 hard jets (pT1,2>100 GeV; pT3,4>50 GeV) • No isolated electrons or muons (pT>20 GeV)

  20. Missing energy Missing energy plot.

  21. Tau likelihood. This is a plot of a tau selection likelihood. It should be more then 0 for the candidate to be a tau jet. Shape must be much more smooth, no peaks. Compare to DC1 results.

More Related