230 likes | 391 Views
Environmental Regulation & Technology Innovation: Controlling Emissions from Aircraft. Presented by, Arthur Marin Deputy Director Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) 2001: An Airspace Odyssey Airport Air Quality Symposium San Diego, CA March 1, 2001. Overview.
E N D
Environmental Regulation & Technology Innovation: Controlling Emissions from Aircraft Presented by, Arthur Marin Deputy Director Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) 2001: An Airspace Odyssey Airport Air Quality Symposium San Diego, CA March 1, 2001
Overview • Make the case that technology-forcing standards are needed for aircraft engines • Using examples from other industry sectors to evaluate the prospects for development of new and cost-effective emission control technologies for aircraft engines
Hypothesis • Significant additional reductions are achievable for the aviation sector with appropriate “forward looking” engine standards • Reductions will accrue at far lower cost than suggested by initial predictions
Challenge • The concerns & issues facing the aviation sector mirror those of other industries faced with emission reduction demands: -sector’s relative contribution to air pollution problems - untested/unknown technological options - unknown costs - timing concerns and constraints
Significance of Aircraft Emissions • Only large sector with projected growth in NOx emissions over next several decades • Technology-forcing engine standards will be needed just to reduce the rate of the projected growth in aircraft NOx emissions
National Aircraft NOx Inventory tons/yr
NESCAUM Report:Environmental Regulation & Technology Innovation • Evaluated historical development of control technologies to better understand the keys to establishing and implementing cost-effective pollution controls • 3 case studies: SO2 from power plants; NOx from power plants; & automobiles
NESCAUM Report:Key Findings • “Where strong regulatory drivers exists, substantial technological improvements & steady reductions in control costs follow.” • “Dynamic occurs even when control options were limited or untested at time regulations were introduced.”
SO2 From Power Plants • Flue gas desulfurization (scrubbing) equipment was first installed at power plant in London in 1930s • First US installation in 1968 • High capital & operational costs • Early units hampered by reliability problems
SO2 From Power Plants • Local control requirements only • few technological advances • 1977 CAAA: NSPS for power plants • scrubber cost dropped / improved reliability • 1990 CAAA: Coal utilities invest in scrubbers for acid rain program • costs continue to decline far below projections • Late 90s: Prospect new PM/SO2standards • fuel switching
NOx From Power Plants • Technologies in use outside US • Resistance in this country • Weak regulatory drivers prior to 1990 CAA
NOx From Power Plants • Key technology drivers: • 1970/77 CAA new source performance standards • California Initiatives (NOx as a precursor to ozone) • 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments • OTC NOx MOU / NOx SIP Call (cover existing facilities) • Now: routine use of advanced approaches: • SCR, SNCR, Gas and Coal Reburn
Automobile Emissions • 1965 -- 2005: Cars 95+% Cleaner • California Regulations • Title II of the CAA • Technological innovations • catalytic converters, fuel injection • computer controls • evaporative emission controls • cleaner gasoline (lead, RVP, RFG, sulfur) • ZEVs / Hybrids
Conclusions Advanced air pollution control technologies don’t become commercially available at attractive prices until after regulatory requirements are established.
Conclusions Technology-forcing standards would likely lead to innovative approaches to reduce NOx emissions from aircraft engines at costs significantly below initial projections.
Conclusions • Technology advances are achieved at significant cost and effort to industry • Required tremendous innovation & ingenuity on the part of industry • Demand for cars & electricity have continued to grow