230 likes | 249 Views
This study outlines a framework for a graduate program in Systems Engineering. The research method involved surveys of existing programs, competency-focused curriculum design, and review of courses to match industry needs. By identifying 16 topical areas across 4 levels - Foundation, Introductory, Core, and Specialization Courses - this framework aims to address key competencies required by the industry. The group consisted of representatives from academia, industry, and government, focusing on existing graduate-level courses in the US. The curriculum framework was derived from analyzing existing programs and aligning them with industry competencies. The ultimate goal is to provide guidance to institutions offering degrees in Systems Engineering.
E N D
PROPOSING A FRAMEWORK FOR A REFERENCE CURRICULUM FOR A GRADUATE PROGRAM IN SYSTEMS ENGINEERINGINCOSE International Workshop 2007 Rashmi Jain INCOSE, Head of Education and Research
SE Curriculum WG • Scope: Focus on existing SE centric1 graduate level courses offered by various institutions and universities across the US. • SE Curriculum WG was formed to discuss the relevant issues on the subject and provide guidance. • The group represented several institutions from academia, industry, and government both from the US and overseas 1basic and advanced level programs leading to a bachelors or higher degree in SE comprise a distinct category with a discipline-like focus. Included herein are only those degree programs where the concentration is designated as SE; where SE is the intended major area of study.
Research Methodology • Survey of Existing Programs: • Initial survey of existing SE programs was based on previous work and reports on graduate curriculum, personal phone calls, and follow-up emails to the department heads. • The database was organized to provide details on the name of the university, program, core courses, elective courses, program contact details, course credit, pedagogy, and mode of delivery. • SE curriculum WG reviewed the list of programs, provided inputs for its completeness and recommended a format for a curriculum framework.
Research Methodology • Survey of Existing Programs: • Second round of on-going survey based on • letters to the universities, • graduate catalogs obtained from universities, • information provided by the program contacts, • course descriptions obtained from the program websites and catalogs, • published papers on SE curriculum, • INCOSE directory, • www.nces.ed.gov , • university websites, and • professional societies. • Updates based on follow-up e-mails requesting confirmation of each university’s SE program and course information sent to the contacts at the universities (37.5% return rate).
SE Degrees Awarded by University *B = Bachelors *M = Masters *P = Ph.D.
Research Methodology • Competencies focused curriculum • SE curriculum WG and researchers agreed that the curriculum framework should address the SE competencies needs of the industry • SE competencies (Appendix 1) that were considered were derived based on: • Engineering Process Improvement, “SE Curriculum”, EPI 270-15 Rev. 1.1, April 5, 2006, Lockheed Martin, 2006. • INCOSE UK Advisory Board, “Systems Engineering Core Competencies Framework”, INCOSE UK, 2005. This report referenced the following: • International Standards Organization ISO15288, • Capability Maturity Model Integration, • EIA731, • INCOSE Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge & Handbook, • NASA Handbook, • IEE/BCS Safety Competency Guidelines, • A review of systems engineering competency work conducted by: BAE Systems, EADS Astrium, General Dynamics, Loughborough University, Ministry of Defense (Director General Smart Acquisition), Thales, University College London, and feedback from the Systems Engineering Community. • Stevens Internal Survey, Feb, 2003, and • Others
Research Methodology • Review of the existing SE programs: • Identified commonalities in course contents based on the review of SE program course descriptions. • Defined initial set of Topical Areas (TA) addressing both the industry required SE competencies & incorporate the breadth of courses offered by the SE programs. • Defined the 'best fit' category for each university's SE courses • Sorted courses by categorization • Baseline course descriptions • Reiterative process • Reviewed completeness of content.
Research Methodology • Review of the existing SE programs: • Each course was placed into one of the four levels (Appendix 2) • Level 0: Foundation Courses • Level 1: Introductory Courses • Level 2: Core Courses • Level 3: Specialization Courses • Topical areas were cross referenced to industry needs through QFD • Identified potential gaps in the process or gaps in the capability to meet industry needs. • Process was repeated until industry needs were sufficiently addressed and Topical Areas were refined into some suggested topical areas for a SE curriculum.
SE Topical Areas • Final grouping of the sixteen topical areas into four levels • Foundation Courses • Mathematics • Probability and Statistics • Introductory Courses • Fundamentals of Systems Engineering • Introduction to Systems Engineering Management • Core Courses • Systems Design/Architecture • Systems Integration and Test • Quality, Safety and Systems Suitability • Modeling, Simulation and Optimization • Decisions, Risks and Uncertainty • Software Systems Engineering • Specialization Courses • General Project Management • Finance, Economics, and Cost Estimation • Manufacturing, Production, and Operations • Organizational Leadership • Engineering Ethics and Legal Considerations • Masters Project or Seminar
Gaps Analyzed: SE Programs • Correlation of the topical areas with the SE competencies • SE competencies not addressed adequately: • System concepts • Architectural design • Modeling and simulation • Closely followed by: • System requirements • Determine and manage stakeholder requirements • Super-system capability issues • SE course offerings that need improvements: • Level 1: Introductory Courses • Fundamentals of SE • Level 2: Core course • System design/architecture • Systems integration • Quality, safety, and systems suitability • Decisions, risks and uncertainty
Gaps Analyzed: SE Programs • Correlation within the identified topical areas • Core courses that had weak relationship or absence of any relationship with some of the other topical areas • Quality, safety, and systems suitability • Modeling, simulation and optimization • Decisions, risks and uncertainty • Serious gaps were noticed between the above three and the specialized/elective offerings below: • General project management • Finance, economics, and cost estimation • Organizational leadership
Specialization Courses Specialization Courses Software Systems Engineering • Software Systems Engineering • General Project Management • General Project Management • Finance, Economics, and Cost Estimation • Finance, Economics, and Cost Estimation • Manufacturing, Production, and Operations • Manufacturing, Production, and Operations • Organizational Leadership • Organizational Leadership • Engineering Ethics and Legal Considerations • Engineering Ethics and Legal Considerations • Masters Project or Seminar • Masters Project or Seminar • Level 3: Level 3: Level 3: (12 Credits) (9 Credits) • Systems Design/Architecture • Systems Design/Architecture • Systems Integration and Test • Systems Integration and Test • Quality, Safety, and Systems Suitability • Quality, Safety, and Systems Suitability Level 2: Core Courses Level 2: Core Courses Level 2: Core Courses • Modeling, Simulation and Optimization • Modeling, Simulation and Optimization (12 Credits) (12 Credits) • Decisions, Risks and Uncertainty • Decisions, Risks and Uncertainty • Fundamentals of Systems Engineering • Fundamentals of Systems Engineering • Intro to Systems Engineering • Intro to Systems Engineering Level 1: Introductory Courses Level 1: Introductory Courses Level 1: Introductory Courses Management Management (6 Credits) (9 Credits) • General Mathematics • General Mathematics Level 0: Foundation Courses Level 0: Foundation Courses Level 0: Foundation Courses • Probability & Statistics • Probability & Statistics Framework for reference curriculum for Graduate SE Centric Program