500 likes | 522 Views
CF3B r Data handeling agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/PXP-150910ak.pxp : agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.xls agust, www,......cf3br/PPT-150910ak.ppt. agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.xls. Updated: 190910. Date / time of record. Scan regions:. Start. 15.09. Stop.
E N D
CF3Br Data handeling agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/PXP-150910ak.pxp : agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.xls agust, www,......cf3br/PPT-150910ak.ppt
agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.xls Updated: 190910
Date / time of record Scan regions: Start 15.09 Stop 14.09 13.09 10.09 09.09 2hv / cm-1 agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.pxp Updated: 170910
Br lines (Br**(2S+1XJ )<-<- Br*(2P1/2) Br lines 20560-20610 See slide 5 ath agust,heima, ....CF3Br/Sept-10/XLS-150910ak.pxp, Layout: 0, Graph:0, Table: 0 Updated: 170910
1D-REMPI Int CF3Br; 100910ak Wave129 (81903.32 cm-1) Data file: 20450_20480 Integrated intensity of iBr+ signal vs 2hv NB! 1)Not corrected for Laser power 2) Includes “offset-bgr” Br**(4P3/2 ) <-<- Br*(2P1/2) Br**(4P5/2 )<-<- Br*(2P1/2) 2hv = 4 x hv(Laser) / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-100910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 6, Graph: 10 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610 (130910), 2D-REMPI: hv(Laser) Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 0 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : hv(Laser) Clearly som Br+ signal iBr+ Mw CF3+ agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 0 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610 (130910), 1D-REMPI : CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 7 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610 (130910), 1D-REMPI : iBr+; i=79,81 Br**(4D3/2 )<-<- Br*(2P1/2) 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout3, Graph: 9 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610-2 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610-2 (130910), 1D-REMPI : CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 5 Updated: 170910
Data 20560-20610-2 (130910), 1D-REMPI : iBr+; i=79,81 Br**(4D3/2 )<-<- Br*(2P1/2) 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout2, Graph: 7 Updated: 170910
There is inconsistancy in terms of the intensity of CF3 vs 2hv for the datafiles • 20560-20610 and 20560-20610-2 (see slides 8 and 11)
Data 20600-20650 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw Is CF2+ (50 amu) changing wih 2hv? Let´s check agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 3 Updated: 170910
Data 20600-20650 (130910), 1D-REMPI : CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 5 Updated: 170910
Data 20600-20650-2 (130910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910akc.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2 Updated: 170910
Data 20600-20650-2 (130910), 1D-REMPI : CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910akc.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4 Updated: 170910
There is a consistant drop in the intensity of CF3 vs 2hv for the datafiles • 20600-20650 and 20600-20650-2 (see slides 15 and 17)
Data 20650-20600 (130910), 1D-REMPI : CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-170910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 4 Updated: 170910
Now it is constant (slide 19)! • This is inconsistant with the intensity of CF3 vs 2hv for the datafiles • 20600-20650 and 20600-20650-2 (see slides 15 and 17) • It might be worth comparing the CF3+ spectra with som impurity signals (C2+).. • as a reference to see if analogous behaviour is seen for these. • Kári (e-mail, 180910): On that day, 13.09.10, we were having troubles with the peaks shifting back and forth and I fear that the laser power was not being monitored properly. None of the measurements were really adequate. Now, these measurements over the region 20560-20650 might need to be redone in order to solve this inconsistency, but_ I suspect that the shifting of the peaks goes hand in hand with lower laser power._ And since the laser power wasn't being correctly monitored, a correction for the data can not be made. I remember being unsatisfied with the first measurement (20560-20610) due to shifting but continued with the next measurement (20600-20650) to see if the problem would solve itself, it of course did not. The region was then scanned back and forth with no progress until we were told to "ignore" the shift so we measured the regions again (20560-20610_2 & 20600-20650_2). But on the next day 14.09.10 we also measured 20650-20600 and there you have constant CF intensity vs 2hv. The measurement was much more stable after Wang had tuned the instruments a bit. Updated: 180910
Data 20650-20600 (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 180910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-180910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 6
Data 20650-20600 (140910), Mass spectrum (wave157) : CF381Br 150 amu largest mass expected Unnecessary long scan!!!!! Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-180910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 8 Updated: 190910
Data 20640-20690 (140910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2 Updated: 190910
Data 20640-20690 (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 4
Data 20680-20730 (140910; P Stable), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910
Data 20680-20730 (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4
Data 20720-20770-bad (140910; P stable), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw NB: scale is incorrect agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 7; Table:4(rempi2) Updated: 190910
Data 20720-20770-bad (140910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910aka.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 9
Data 20720-20770 (150910; P stable), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 2; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910
Data 20720-20770 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4
Data 20720-20770 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Impurity: C2+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 7
Data 20720-20770 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Impurity: C+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 4, Graph: 11
NB: CF3+ signal shows intensity vs 2hv behavious which Differs from that of impurity signals (C+ and C2+) Not possible to make a contour map of Data file 20760-20810; Y –axis resolution is low(?)
Data 20760-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akc.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3
It seems to be that the CF3+ signal relative to the impurity signal varies • between scans: • See: • PXP-180919ak.pxp • PXP-190919aki.pxp; i = ,a,b,c
Data 20650-20600 (140910), Mass spectrum (wave0 – 251) : Mw Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-180910ak.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 4, Graph: 7
Data 20720-20770 (150910),Mass spectrum (wave0 –249): Mw Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akb.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 5
Data 20800-20850 (150910), 2D-REMPI: : ? 2hv Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910
Data 20800-20850 (150910), Mass spectrum (wave220) : iBr+ ? CF3+ Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 4 Updated: 190910
Data 20800-20850 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Br**(2F5/2 ) <-<- Br*(2P1/2) 79Br+ 83376.37 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 6
Data 20800-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): NB!:laser power decreases as: P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ (see slide 2) CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 3, Graph: 8
Data 20800-20850 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Unknown Mass: 83-84! 83376.37 cm-1 The wavenumber value tells us that this is a bromine atom (2+1)REMPI signal; the unusual TOF (mass) value suggests that this is a delayd Br atom signal. But is this 81Br+? Where is 79Br+ Most probably this is electronic oscillation effect(??)...but WHY? 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 4, Graph: 10
Data 20800-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): NB!:laser power decreases as: P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ (see slide 2) C2+; impurity 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 5, Graph: 12
Data 20800-20810 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): NB!:laser power decreases as: P0=8.5 mJ, Pe=5.5 mJ (see slide 2) CF3+ C2+; impurity 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910akd.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 6, Graph: 12
Data 20840-20890 (150910), 2D-REMPI: : 2hv ? Mw agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910ake.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 0, Graph: 3; Table:2(rempi1) Updated: 190910
Data 20840-20890 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): Br**(2F5/2 ) <-<- Br*(2P1/2) 79Br+ 83376.37 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910ake.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 1, Graph: 5
Data 20840-20890 (150910), 1D-REMPI (not corrected for laser power): NB!:laser power decreases as: P0=7.5mJ; Pe= 6.5 mJ (see slide 2) CF3+ 2hv / cm-1 Updated: 190910 agust, heima, ...CF3Br/PXP-190910ake.pxp (IGOR file), Layout: 2, Graph: 7