1 / 42

Turning noise into signal: a paradox? Kees Wapenaar, Delft University of Technology

Delve into the paradox of turning noise into signal through seismic interferometry, exploring the robustness in signal extraction despite practical challenges and relying on wave stability for success. Follow the journey from deterministic clockwork to uncertainties and chaos, highlighting the stability of wave propagation and applications in various media.

clairew
Download Presentation

Turning noise into signal: a paradox? Kees Wapenaar, Delft University of Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Turning noise into signal: a paradox? Kees Wapenaar, Delft University of Technology Roel Snieder, Colorado School of Mines Presented at: Making Waves about Seismics: a Tribute to Peter Hubral’s achievements, not only in Geophysics Karlsruhe, February 28, 2007

  2. The Green’s function emerges from the cross-correlation of the diffuse wave field at two points of observation:

  3. Weaver and Lobkis

  4. Campillo and Paul

  5. Campillo and Paul

  6. Seismic interferometry at global scale:US-Array

  7. ‘Turning noise into signal’ works in practice and we • have a theory that explains it …. • ……so what is the paradox? • Extraction of signal is fairly robust, despite: • Assumptions about source distribution are never • fulfilled in practical situations. • Signal extraction relies for a large part on multiple • scattering. Is it stable?

  8. Laplace, 1814: The physical world is a deterministic clockwork

  9. Laplace, 1814: The physical world is a deterministic clockwork Poincaré, 1903: OK Pierre, but uncertainties in initial conditions lead to chaos at later times

  10. Laplace, 1814: The physical world is a deterministic clockwork Poincaré, 1903: OK Pierre, but uncertainties in initial conditions lead to chaos at later times Heisenberg, True Henri, but at atomic 1927: scale only probabilities are determined

  11. Laplace, 1814: The physical world is a deterministic clockwork Poincaré, 1903: OK Pierre, but uncertainties in initial conditions lead to chaos at later times Heisenberg, True Henri, but at atomic 1927: scale only probabilities are determined Astonishing Werner! But let’s go back to macroscopic physics and now look at waves

  12. Particle scattering: chaotic after 8 scatterers Wave scattering: still stable after 30+ scatterers

  13. F Einstein, 1905, Brownian motion Kubo, 1966, fluctuation-dissipation theorem

  14. Conclusion: Robustness of ‘turning noise into signal’ is explained by stability of wave propagation Finally, Let’s see how this can be generalized

  15. Dissipating media (no time-reversal invariance) Applications for EM waves in conducting media, diffusion, acoustic waves in viscous media, etc. Systems with higher order DV’s Applications for e.g. bending waves

  16. Flowing media (non-reciprocal Green’s functions)

  17. Flowing media (non-reciprocal Green’s functions)

  18. Schroedinger’s equation ‘Zero offset’

  19. General vectorial formulation (for example, electroseismic)

More Related