1 / 26

October 3, 2012

Division of Teacher and Leader Excellence CERTIFICATION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNOR’S EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS TASK FORCE. October 3, 2012. Contents. Overview of Major Proposed Changes.

clara
Download Presentation

October 3, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Division of Teacher and Leader ExcellenceCERTIFICATION PROPOSED AMENDMENTSPURSUANT TO THE GOVERNOR’S EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS TASK FORCE October 3, 2012

  2. Contents

  3. Overview of Major Proposed Changes Mission: Pursuant to the 40 regulatory changes related to licensure and professional development in the ETTF Report, these amendments are designed to provide schools and districts with greater levels of flexibility and efficiency with their human capital practices Goals of Proposed Changes: • Ease requirements that can be burdensome for districts in attracting, hiring and placing staff • Shift from compliance-driven professional development to a streamlined process that supports individualized development

  4. Ease Requirements: An Overview • Issue: Cumbersome certification requirements and administrative processes create a limited pool of high-quality candidates • Proposed Change: Streamline certification requirements in specific areas • Rationale: Broaden the pool of high-quality staff and reduce the administrative burden on fully certified teaching and administrative staff

  5. Ease Requirements: Details

  6. Ease Requirements: Details(continued)

  7. Ease Requirements: Details(continued) *Not from ETTF

  8. Changes That Have Been Deferred • Several recommendations from the task force will not be introduced in these proposed regulations, as they require further due diligence; examples include: • Removing 6 credit limit on transfer of professional education (pedagogy) credits from community colleges to four year teacher prep colleges • Restricting currently unlimited service of substitute nurses • Offering flexibility in substituting experience for the required 24 seat hours training for alternate route candidates in basic classroom skills and pedagogy • Reducing entry level study requirements for physical science, math, middle school, social studies and all other sciences

  9. Shift from Compliance-Driven PD: An Overview • Issue: Compliance-driven, cumbersome PD planning and approval process lacks focus on PD that drives student learning • Proposed Changes: • Clarify and expand PD-related definitions • Streamline planning process and consolidate oversight at local and state levels • Rationale: Focus PD on rich, aligned content while reducing committees and levels of oversight

  10. Shift from Compliance-Driven PD: Details

  11. Shift from Compliance-Driven PD: Details(cont) *See details on the following slide

  12. Shift from Compliance-Driven PD: Details(cont) Streamlining the PD Planning Process & Consolidating Oversight

  13. Shift from Compliance-Driven PD: Details(cont)

  14. Contents

  15. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapters 4 & 5

  16. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 6

  17. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapters 9 & 11

  18. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 12

  19. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 13

  20. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 13 (cont.)

  21. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 15

  22. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 15 (cont.)

  23. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 15 (cont.)

  24. EETF Proposed Changes: Subchapter 16

  25. Proposed Changes Not From EETF

  26. Proposed Changes Not From EETF (cont.)

More Related