240 likes | 392 Views
Challenges and Successes of Volunteer Monitoring: Zeloski Wetland Restoration, L ake Mills, WI. Bryan Huberty , Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator, Rock River Coalition 2005 Citizen-Based Monitoring Conference. The Rock River Coalition: Our Mission.
E N D
Challenges and Successes of Volunteer Monitoring:Zeloski Wetland Restoration, Lake Mills, WI Bryan Huberty, Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator, Rock River Coalition 2005 Citizen-Based Monitoring Conference
The Rock River Coalition: Our Mission • The Rock River Coalition (RRC) is a local, non-profit organization with a mission to educate and provide opportunities for people of diverse interests to work together to improve the environmental, recreational, cultural and economic resources of the Rock River Basin.
RRC’s Wetland/Shoreline Protection Issue Team Priorities: • Native shoreline restoration • Wetland prioritization for restoration • Establishing new wetland restoration volunteer monitoring
History of a Conservation Partnership Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Madison Audubon Society (MAS), WIDNR, Pheasants Forever and other local groups aim to restore large wetlands in south-central WI through government-citizen partnerships on a “basin” level. RRC approaches NRCS to form partnership for monitoring wetland restorations in the Rock River Basin. MAS acquires a 1,496 acre muck farm in Lake Mills and Pheasants Forever acquires a 2,736 acre tamarack swamp in Jefferson from local farmer, Dennis Zeloski, in 2003.
Background:Zeloski Wetland Monitoring Program • Partnership determines not enough information is available on citizen monitoring programs for large restorations. • Hiring a professional monitoring team not financially feasible. • Bryan Huberty is hired in 2004 to develop a monitoring program and coordinate citizen volunteer activities in 2005.
London Marsh: early history • 1836: Land surveyed as “all wet marsh. Set quarter post in marsh too wet for mound.” • 1850’s: The Fighting Finches, a local outlaw gang that robbed stagecoaches, used marsh. • Late 1800’s: A railroad was built through the wetland. One train car lost in sinkhole. • 1936: Nature club from Madison camped at Hope Lake Bog. • 1962: Hugh Iltis, Helmut Meuller and Jim Zimmerman survey Hope Lake Bog’s plant species.
London Marsh and Hope Lake Bog: Aerial Photos (1937) London Marsh Hope Lake Bog
Marsh drained for Muck Farms • 1946: Technology became available to drain wetlands and Felix Zeloski began to acquire, drain and farm wetlands. • 1950’s to 1999: 3-5 feet of soil lost due to oxidation of peat and water/wind erosion. Land development booms in Sun Prairie, 16 miles to the northwest at the headwaters of the Koshkonong Creek. • 1986: DNR acquires abandoned railroad and creates the Glacial Drumlin Trail.
Muck Farms: 1940 to 1950 1940: Marsh partially drained – some native vegetation remains 1950: Transition to ag complete
What was lost? • Native plant communities: tamarack swamp, wetland, sedge meadow, wet and mesic prairie • Grassland and marsh bird populations • Several feet of topsoil • Rare and restricted invertebrates, anurans, mammals and other wildlife • Groundwater filtration
Return of the Wetland • 2000: A heavy summer rain sends floodwaters from Koshkonong Creek into Zeloski’s farm fields, creating lakes. • 2002: Dennis Zeloski applies for 30-year WRP easement for Muck Farms and sells 2,736 acres in Jefferson to Pheasants Forever. • 2003: Zeloski sells Muck Farms to MAS. • 2005: Cropland farmed while NRCS develops restoration plan. Citizens monitoring begins. • 2006-07: Wetlands will be restored and opened to public. Long-term monitoring begins.
Muck Farms: Today Site Map External drainage ditch
2005 Citizen Monitoring • Anurans (Frogs & Toads) • Birds • Lepidoptera (Butterflies) • Small Mammals • Odonata (Dragonflies and Damselflies) • Plants • Water Quality • Misc.
Anuran (Frog & Toad) Monitoring • WI Anuran Survey protocol • 3 visits/yr (early spring, late spring and mid- summer) • 8 species out of 12 total in state recorded • Nearby sites surveyed due to lack of water • 10 volunteers contributed to 4 outings in May, June and July.
Bird Monitoring • Annual Crane and Pheasant Count (April 16) • Spring Migration Survey (late March-May) • Breeding Bird Survey (June) • Pheasant and Duck Brood Survey (August) • Fall Waterfowl Migration (October) • 9 volunteers contributed to 2 surveys in April and June.
Odonata Monitoring • Goal: Six site visits from late May to late Sept • Walk a specific route: ½ to 2 hours • Specimens collected for WDNR records • Site too degraded; 3 nearby natural areas surveyed- Hope Lake Bog, Bean Lake Bog and Red Cedar Lake • 16 volunteers contributed to 4 surveys in July, Aug. and Sept. • 12 species recorded including 7 new records for Jefferson Co.
Lepidoptera (Butterflies) • Protocol similar to Odonata • June 1 to Aug 7 is peak survey period • July 4 is national butterfly survey date • Site too degraded; nearby Audubon sanctuary prairie used for training • 5 volunteers contributed to 1 survey in August
Floristic Monitoring • Floristic Quality Analysis (FQA) conducted on 2 acre oak island and Hope Lake Bog. • Invasive species mapped to help engineers during restoration • Degraded tamarack swamp too overgrown to survey now, but will be catalogued early next spring. • 15-20 volunteers contributed to 4 surveys in Oct (’04), June & Sept (’05).
Water Quality • 1x/month • Storm events (over 1” rain) • Independent citizen team collects data with RRC’s basic water quality kit • USDA wetland biologist, Greg Kidd, collects data with the Hydrolab • Data are compared to determine accuracy of home kits • Conclusion: water is very polluted now, biomass is very high and nutrient levels are influenced by large cattle farm directly north and illegal dumping in past. • 6 volunteers contributed to 3 events in May, June and July.
Miscellaneous Monitoring • Soils and residual seed bank survey • Prairie and wetland seed collection • Photopoints and historical photodocumentation of auction, seeding and restoration activities • Cultural/Historical survey
General Monitoring Challenges • Unpredictable site and weather conditions • Significant drought • Mobilizing a large volunteer list • Maintaining an accurate database • Training volunteers at highly degraded site • Timing surveys to capture peak activity • Choosing or designing best protocol for each team • Maintaining a consistent monitoring effort • Record keeping and maintenance • Onsite storage for equipment and materials
2005 Monitoring Successes •Over 30 volunteers out of 51 potential ones participated in monitoring • Independent monitoring by citizen-led teams • Baseline data collected for all planned monitoring • Bonus data collected • Student volunteers’ research projects • 7 new county records for odonates • Participation in NRCS Earth Team Program • No accidents or injuries • Rock River Coalition named “Top Citizen Monitoring Program in WI for 2005” by WDNR.
NRCS Site and Seeding Maps 648 acres seeding Nov. 2005
Acknowledgements • Photo Credits: Bryan Huberty, Sue Probst www.edenpics.com (Wood Duck) • NRCS, RRC, MAS, WIDNR, UW Extension, Pheasants Forever