1 / 8

ZOAS 2.0

ZOAS 2.0. Session 1 of 2 Exploration of issues and possible ‘breakthroughs’ Facilitating Innovation trough S elf O rganization and A utonomous S ystems. Overview ZOAS 1.0 see http://cmapspublic3.ihmc.us/rid=1KJ0KSXTK-4YQ7BP-1R7K/zoas%20overview.cmap.

cleary
Download Presentation

ZOAS 2.0

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ZOAS 2.0 Session 1 of 2 Exploration of issues and possible ‘breakthroughs’ Facilitating Innovation trough Self Organization and Autonomous Systems Overview ZOAS 1.0 see http://cmapspublic3.ihmc.us/rid=1KJ0KSXTK-4YQ7BP-1R7K/zoas%20overview.cmap Overview ZOAS 2.0 see http://cmapspublic3.ihmc.us/rid=1KZ4MLQ87-RMHDNV-Y0M/SOAS%20phase2.cmap

  2. ZOAS ‘afhechting’ ZOAS-2 041.01077 • Doelopdrachtgever (Peter Werkhoven/Directieraad) • De uit ZOAS (tot juni) verkregen inzichten en beschikbare kennis laten doorstromen naar Thema’s Energie, Mobiliteit en Gezond Leven, respectievelijk: ‘smart grids’, ‘cooperatedriving’, en ‘darm flora’ • Opdracht en uitkomst mbt die 3 deelprojecten: • Stel de potentiele markttoepassingen vast. Potentie gevalideerd aan (en met) de markt. • Geef aan wat is er reeds in huis aan inzichten en kennis. Stel vast wat mogelijk nog ontbreekt (gap). • Schets beoogde Ontwikkeltrajecten (roadmaps) en onderkende kennis lacunes, resulterend in research agenda, met mogelijke allianties… • Beoogd Tijdpad: • Half oktober Sessie 1 - Discussie Tussenresultaten met forum uit Thema-reps, PSn, ZOAS team. • Half november Sessie 2 - Discussie Concept eindresultaten met forum • Begin december Oplevering Concept eindrapportage aan directie • Project: Verantw: Hans vdB: Sgrids; Lori T: Cdriving; Jan vdG: Dflora. PeterE/Tony geheel. Omvang: 3*30K (3*20 productie+30K afronding)

  3. Participants Hours and Travel Costs to be billed to 041.01077/01.01

  4. Agenda Session 1

  5. ZOAS 1.0 from controlling the predictable to managing the unpredictable Issue Strengths: rich assets, multi-sector, multi-domain, multi-disciplinary, multiple applicable technologies Weakness: fragmented, ‘bewustonbekwaam’ Opportunities: complex (wicked) problems (Grand Challenges, TopSectoren, BigSociety,….) Threats:losing ‘right to play’ • (expected) Results • Targeted sensor development (AMSN) • Control Rooms (interaction design) • Multi-stakeholder collaboration (goal setting) • (Cyber)security (anomaly detection) • E-freight systems(autonomous parcels) • Smart Grids (distributed power generation) • Living Labs (evidence based CD&E) • ……………………….. SOAS Approach ETP SOASroadmaps with stakeholdersnetwork thinking and representationsystem dynamics & agent based modellinganomaly detection & pattern recognitionself learning algorithmsmeta data architecture Community buildingwithin and between stakeholders and disciplinesgoal synchronization, shared values, appreciation of diversity, crowd sourcing R&D enhancement in ETP’s & VP’sawareness of ‘adaption, robustness & learning’system behavior is emergent in complex systems Impact External Enhancing competivenessFacilitating fair and sustainable societiesCombining people and knowledge InternalSatisfaction & ProductivityCreativity & InnovationAdaption, Robustness & LearningTrust & Prosperity

  6. Darm flora • Overall system description is given on factors involved in BRD • A multi-factor, multi-level, multi-stakeholder complex problem • Levels need to be delineated more precisely • Identification of [significant] microbes, their interactions, and factors involved at level microbial network is required, cow is then seen as environment , this the would make ABM possible • Identification of actors and factors and interactions at organism level (cow & humans) is also required, but not the focus, for now? • Which issue will be resolved by this approach, which stakeholders will benefit from this research in the future? • System dynamics approach seems useful to combine both levels of analysis Utility of SOAS • Self organization is thwarted by indiscriminate use of antibiotics [evolution of resistant microbes] • Strategy Maximization of beef production is leading, consequences for animal welfare and human public health are emerging • Optimization of beef production could be alternative strategy for the (near)future

  7. Smart Grids • Background has been described: a multi-factor, multi-level, multi-stakeholder complex problem • A number of issues has been put forward • Which issue will be addressed needs to be decided, depends on which stakeholder will be served, a system dynamics approach could bring clarity ¿MARVEL? Utility of SOAS • Human behaviour and decision making are central to supply and demand balancing at all system levels; can this be (partially) automated to achieve affordable, fair and sustainable energy economy in the (near)future?

  8. Cooperate Driving • A combination of cooperate and smart logistics is being considered • Issues need to be defined • Which stakeholders to be served needs to be defined Utility of SOAS • Is not yet clear

More Related