150 likes | 258 Views
Mark Zunckel & Eugene Cairncross CSIR Pen Technikon SAWS SRK. A Dynamic Air Pollution Prediction System DAPPS. Innovation Fund. Dept Arts, Culture, Science & Technology Call for consortia South African partners Large projects, e.g. 3-years
E N D
Mark Zunckel & Eugene Cairncross CSIR Pen Technikon SAWS SRK A Dynamic Air Pollution Prediction SystemDAPPS
Innovation Fund • Dept Arts, Culture, Science & Technology • Call for consortia • South African partners • Large projects, e.g. 3-years • Contribution in specified key areas, e.g. biotechnology, technology & information
Air Quality Management Sources Management Intervention Chemistry Transport Deposition Dispersion Receptor impact Ambient concentrations Modeling or monitoring
Air Quality Monitoring • Site specific • Selected pollutants • Accurate • Continuous • Expensive • Can be integrated with modelling
Air Quality Modelling • Spatially continuous • A range of pollutants • Estimation of concentrations • Average concentrations • Cost effective • Integrated with monitoring
DAPPS • Sources: Compile a comprehensive emissions inventory • Meteorology: SAWS forecast fields • Dispersion: Photochemical dispersion model • Receptors: Spatially resolved grid • Forecast map of air pollution data and indicators • Information to manage air quality
High • Medium
Communicating the forecast • Air pollution data and indicators • Map of an area with a number scale or color scale indicating potential health risk • Interactive web site, updated ever 24 hours • Daily newspaper? Other methods?
What DAPPS will not do! • DAPPS will have limitations • Quality of input data • Uncertainty in meteorological predictions • Assumptions in dispersion model • Spatial resolution • Scenario modelling • DAPPS cannot manage air quality
Validation of the system • Meteorological forecast On going validation at SAWS • Source model Point sources Mobile sources Domestic sources • Dispersion model Comparison of estimations with monitored data
Project structure • 3 year research & development project • Number of specialist components to be developed and integrated with one another • Maintain a two-way communications with a number of stakeholders
Project Plan • Year 1: Project launch, components of DAPPS system running independently • Year 2: Integration of the components • Year 3: DAPPS running in test location • Stakeholder involvement throughout the development
Potential sites: Durban (SIB) Richards Bay PE/Coega Cape Metro Vaal Triangle Platinum Area Pietermaritzburg Criteria for selection: Stakeholders buy-in Data availability Digital information Issue (s) Range of source types History /other work Isolation from sources Local by-laws Running costs Complex meteorology Why Cape Town?
Conclusion We believe that we can develop a system to assist in the management of air quality & CMC is our prefered development site To make it happen, we need: • Your buy-in as key stakeholders, • Your input now to help specify the outputs of the system; to influence the design of the system, • Your input throughout the system development.