1 / 15

TAXONOMIES & MEASUREMENT OF MOTIVES TAXONOMIES: MURRAY’S CATALOG OF NEEDS

TAXONOMIES & MEASUREMENT OF MOTIVES TAXONOMIES: MURRAY’S CATALOG OF NEEDS McCLELLAND’S IMPLICIT MOTIVES : achievement, power, affiliation, intimacy MEASUREMENT: UNSTRUCTURED METHODS Free association, dream analysis PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES Rorschach TAT

cleo-phelps
Download Presentation

TAXONOMIES & MEASUREMENT OF MOTIVES TAXONOMIES: MURRAY’S CATALOG OF NEEDS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TAXONOMIES & MEASUREMENT OF MOTIVES • TAXONOMIES: • MURRAY’S CATALOG OF NEEDS • McCLELLAND’S IMPLICIT MOTIVES: achievement, power, affiliation, intimacy • MEASUREMENT: • UNSTRUCTURED METHODS • Free association, dream analysis • PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES • Rorschach • TAT • ‘OBJECTIVE’ TECHNIQUES (questionnaires) • Personality Research Form • SHOULD OVERLAP BETWEEN PROJECTIVE & OBJECTIVE • MEASURES BE EXPECTED?

  2. TAXONOMIES OF MOTIVES: • HENRY MURRAY (1893-1988) • First systematic study and classification of needs • ‘Explorations in Personality’ • Catalog of 20 needs (table 4.4) • DAVID McCLELLAND (?-1998) • Achievement • Power • Affiliation • Intimacy

  3. IMPLICIT MOTIVES Achievement:need to do things well, to take pleasure over overcoming difficulty, to create things (GO FORWARD) Power:need to be in charge, in control --impact over other people-- have status and possessions, influence others (BE ABOVE) Affiliation: motive to spend time, interact, with other people alike (BE NEAR) Intimacy: need to feel close to people, that you understand/accept others and viceversa (FUSE, MERGE)

  4. MEASUREMENT: UNSTRUCTURED METHODS “Dreams, fantasies, and other products of imagination are the ‘royal road’ to the unconscious” FREE ASSOCIATION: talking about whatever comes to mind DREAM ANALYSIS: condensation, displacement, symbolic disguise, latent and manifest content

  5. MEASUREMENT: PROJECTIVE TECHNIQUES Unconscious motives are spontaneously ‘projected’ during the interpretation of ambiguous, neutral, semi-structured stimuli (Assumption: an individual puts structure on an ambiguous situation in a way that is consistent with their own conscious & unconscious needs) WORD ASSOCIATON RORSCHACH INKBLOT TEST THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST (TAT)

  6. www.psych.ualberta.ca/~chrisw/ L14ProjectiveTests/img001.jpg

  7. Interpreting the Rorschach • Location • Determinant • Content

  8. From These…..

  9. …To These!

  10. THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST (TAT) Who are the people? What are their names? What are their roles in life? What are their relationships to each other? What has led up to this situation? What is happening right now? What is each person thinking, saying trying to do? What does each person want from whom? What will happen to each person the future? How will it all end?

  11. MEASUREMENT: ‘OBJECTIVE’ TECHNIQUES Paper-and-pencil standardized (i.e.., nomothetic approach) questionnaires that openly ask to rate/rank/list a particular inventory of motive-related statements E.g., Personality Research Form

  12. WHICH IS BETTER? Strengths of Projective Tests: 1) “Disguised objective” of test 2) Bypasses ego and elucidates contents of unconscious 3) Deeper understanding of the individual 4) Diagnostic usefulness for extreme scores Weaknesses of Projectives: 1) Reliability and Validity issues 2) Refutability of underlying theory?

  13. SHOULD OVERLAP BETWEEN ‘PROJECTIVE’ AND ‘OBJECTIVE’ MEASURES BE EXPECTED? Read McClleland’s article !

More Related