1 / 19

Air Security of North America DoD-DHS Capability Development Working Group (CDWG)

Air Security of North America DoD-DHS Capability Development Working Group (CDWG). Kevin “Spanky” Kirsch Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security Director, Office of Special Programs. Jan 22, 2008. NORAD/NORTHCOM. Customs & Border Protection. Defense

cleo
Download Presentation

Air Security of North America DoD-DHS Capability Development Working Group (CDWG)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Air Securityof North AmericaDoD-DHS Capability Development Working Group (CDWG) Kevin “Spanky” Kirsch Science and Technology Directorate Department of Homeland Security Director, Office of Special Programs Jan 22, 2008

  2. NORAD/NORTHCOM Customs & Border Protection Defense (Military Response) Security (Law Enforcement Response) Airspace Domain SecurityOffice of Air & MarineAir & Marine Ops Center (AMOC)Air & Marine LE Units Law Enforcement and Sensor Data Fusion, LE Technical Collections Detect, Intercept, Determine Intent,Interrogate, Arrest, Investigate, Prosecute Airspace DefenseNORADCONRAir Defense Assets(WADS)(EADS) Detect, Identify, Intercept,Determine “Hostile” SharedInformation/Responsibility (Air Domain Awareness) Anti-Terrorism Border Defense Border Security OFO OBP A&M POE SECTOR Air Branch (TARS, LRR, ROTHR. Border Sensors, Satellite trackers, National Systems) Law Enforcement Interagency Collaboration Mexico and Canadian LE cooperation NORTHCOM (TARS, LRR, ROTHR) Air Defense Sectors JTF-N SharedInformation/Responsibility (Air Domain Awareness) BorderOperations Interior Air Defense Interior Air Security SharedInformation/Responsibility (Air Domain Awareness) Long-Range Radar C3ISR & Interdiction Aircraft Law Enforcement Data/Collaboration Long-Range Radar SharedInformation/ Domain Awareness Maritime Domain AwarenessMaritime Patrol Aircraft Coastal and Great Lakes Patrol Boats Maritime Domain Awareness

  3. Current Picture

  4. Domesticn Bordern Foreignn Caribbeann Intelligence AMOC Operations

  5. Detection Identification Coordination Interception Monitoring Marine UAV Operations Border Operations

  6. AMOC Partners DHS CBP FAA DOD/ANG TSA NORAD ICE NORTHCOM NASA JIATF-S Border Patrol JTF-N Secret Service HIDTA Coast Guard IBET/IBIT FBI DEA/EPIC STATE & LOCAL LEA FOREIGN LEA

  7. National Radar System Effort • Long Range Radars (LRR) • Wind Turbine issues • Ongoing FAA / DOD / DHS Service Life Extension Programs can keep some of these operating in the near to mid term (FAA manages, DOD & DHS fund) • Cost of extending other systems • FAA transitioning from ground based primary and secondary radars to the cooperative GPS based Automated Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) system • ADS-B vulnerabilities • Surveillance of non – ADS-B (non-cooperative) aircraft will still be needed • Issues debated at the JPDO forum

  8. National Radar System Effort (cont) • Over the Horizon Radar (OTHR) Working Group • Collaboration with Australia • Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Program – Congressionally mandated research task to evaluate MPAR as an alternative to conventional radar for the full range of current and emerging applications • MPAR could provide; • An effective complement to the FAA GPS system • Improved weather surveillance • Improved surveillance of U.S. airspace for potential threat • Wind turbine effects mitigation • DOD and DHS must take an active role in assessing emerging approaches to improving the Nation’s surveillance capabilities

  9. Related Activities Are Not Coordinated-Recommend a Combined Interagency PO Interested Agencies Activities NORAD USNORTHCOM USPACOM USSTRATCOM MDA USSOUTHCOM PACOM DHS/CBP, TSA, USCG DOT/FAA DoC/NOAA CDS CANADA COMMAND NAV CANADA MPAR CID Capability JCTDs DoHMA FSAs ADS Congressional Mandate Net-centric ERSA Digital Passive Radar NGATS IAMD Architecture Gap Filler IAMD CONOPS NSAS ADS-B SIGINT Integration Bi-nationalSurveillance

  10. Notional Combined Interagency PO Charter • Synchronize efforts to explore technologies and solutions with applications to multi-agency, multi-domain missions • Governance/Oversight of Combined Interagency Program Office • Key focus areas: • Persistent (24/7/365) surveillance • Ability to cue HS / HD resources • Fratricide prevention • Info sharing with Interagency and Multinational Partners • Develop and implement program plan and architecture • Provide operational direction for technology development • Inform related activities: • National Strategy for Aviation Security • Next Generation Air Transportation System • Congressional Reports

  11. DHS/DoD Sponsored Surveillance Summits • Establish a framework for a future looking interagency strategy for air and maritime surveillance in the United States . • Incorporate the non-cooperative surveillance needs of homeland defense and security agencies as fundamental components of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) cooperative-based Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) . • Improve the existing maritime domain surveillance capabilities. • DHS Summit held in CO Springs, June 2007 • DoD Summit to be held at Andrews AFB, 20-21 Feb 2008

  12. Policy Outbrief Themesfrom June Summit • Technology far exceeds policy – a concerted effort from all players must be initiated to catch policy up with technology – this may allow many needs to be met with systems/technologies that all can work to fund, develop and procure • Clarity of mission/jurisdiction – Since there are multiple key players in different departments and agencies, there is confusion regarding roles and responsibilities of each organization and a lack of business rules to facilitate cross talk between the organizations • The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include all facets of surveillance, to include cooperative/non-cooperative detection and tracking, weather detection and tracking, and etc.

  13. Contact Information Kevin “Spanky” Kirsch 202.254.6425 (Office) 202.254.5823 (Fax) UNCLAS- Spanky.Kirsch@dhs.gov JWICS- kjkirsch@dhs.ic.gov

  14. BACKUPSLIDES

  15. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) • Detect airborne and maritime terrorist/ smuggling events and their associated illegal alien and contraband cargos • Covert tracking devices • Enforce borders at Ports of Entry and between Ports of Entry

  16. US Coast Guard • Maritime smuggling/ terrorism • Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) • Port Security

  17. Secret Service • Movement of POTUS • National Special Security Events

  18. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) • Aviation smuggling investigations • Covert tracking devices

  19. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • Airspace control of areas affected by natural and manmade disasters

More Related