1 / 5

Conflicting discourses of private nursery entrepreneurs in KwaZulu-Natal

Conflicting discourses of private nursery entrepreneurs in KwaZulu-Natal. Dr HB Ebrahim International Centre for Studies in Mixed Economies of Childcare 2 June 2008. Introduction.

cody
Download Presentation

Conflicting discourses of private nursery entrepreneurs in KwaZulu-Natal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conflicting discourses of private nursery entrepreneurs in KwaZulu-Natal Dr HB Ebrahim International Centre for Studies in Mixed Economies of Childcare 2 June 2008

  2. Introduction • Main argument – business approach is narrow and limiting. Marginalises access for vulnerable and disadvantaged children • International context • South African context • Research context

  3. Findings and discussion 1 • Enabling the logic of the market Competitive business practices Social class responses Limited racial integration Tight controls

  4. Findings and discussions 2 Disabling the logic of the markets – non market values Care and community spirit

  5. Conclusion • The business approach to early care and education is narrow and limiting. • It focuses on the purchasing power of parents. It promotes an insular view of early care and education. • The emphasis on profit making, competition makes it difficult to create access for vulnerable and disadvantaged children. • Social exclusion results. • The collaborative endeavours, community culture and the ethic of care so needed for vulnerable and disadvantaged children is sidelined.

More Related