1 / 22

Korea: Growth without Natural Resources Chapter 2

Korea: Growth without Natural Resources Chapter 2. Beyond the Aggregate Production Function. People Geopolitical location Climate Natural resources Land. The Korean People. The most racially homogenous Korea is a (very) Confucian country Korea is a (very) Christian country

cole-lynn
Download Presentation

Korea: Growth without Natural Resources Chapter 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Korea: Growth without Natural ResourcesChapter 2

  2. Beyond the Aggregate Production Function • People • Geopolitical location • Climate • Natural resources • Land

  3. The Korean People • The most racially homogenous • Korea is a (very) Confucian country • Korea is a (very) Christian country • Korea may be a dangerous place to live (the North) • Koreans aspire for education • Koreans like to take risks

  4. Korea vs Japan: Natural Disadvantages • Korea has less land per capita • (South) Korea is only ¼ the size of Japan • Korea is a peninsula (maritime conditions) • Korea needs more energy because of a harsher climate • Korea has less fishery and forestry resources

  5. Korea versus Japan: Natural Advantages • Korea has larger rivers and greater hydroelectric power potential • Higher proportion of arable land: 20% vs 13% in Japan (of total land) • Better endowed with: • Limestone (crucial for the production of cement) • Tungsten • Lead

  6. Major Agricultural Indicators for Korea and Japan

  7. Koreans and Agriculture • Koreans’ share of agriculture in GNP is lower than that of Japan • Share of non-agricultural income is roughly 50% in Korea versus 80% in Japan • Households cultivate very small plots of land in both countries • Korea heavily depends on imports of food • Koreans import 70% of the grain they consume, but they are self-sufficient in the production of rice • Nature itself forces Koreans to cultivate their land efficiently by enhancing land productivity

  8. Korea’s Policy to Deal with the Dearth of Land • Efficient use of land is extremely important • Preventing transfer of non-arable land into non-agricultural uses • Serious land shortage in urban areas (e.g. green belt around Seoul since 1973) • Adverse consequences: price of land and housing surge, also congestion • Transferring arable land into business uses might be a good idea • The natural solution to the problem: the population growth rate decline • Key Point: long-term growth strategy must be non-agriculture oriented

  9. Land Use in Korea, 1970 and 2000

  10. Why is Land Scarce in Large Cities? • Natural reasons • Low priority to housing and environment policy • Incorrect use-of-land policy (self-sufficiency in rice was key objective since 1960-s) • Expand rice paddies through reclamation, land clearing, conversion of dry fields • Prohibit shift of arable land to urban use by designating ‘absolute arable’ and ‘relative arable’ land • Absolute arable land can never be transferred • Relative arable land can be transferred, but bureaucratic barriers are high

  11. Regions and Population Distribution • Seoul has a special city status • 9 Provinces • 6 metropolitan cities • 7 major cities have the status of a province • Seoul and Busan regions are two most important ones • Seoul is the heart of the country • Busan region: Pohang (iron and steel), Ulsan (automobiles, shipbuilding, petrochemicals), Changwon (heavy manufacturing)

  12. The Population of Main Regions (th)

  13. The Problem of Seoul • Seoul population and industries have been growing high since the early 1960s • Dispersal plans by the government • Industrial relocation plan • New capital city plan • Plan for relocating head offices of major public enterprises • Rural resettlement plan • However, the dispersal plans were rather command and control rather than market oriented

  14. Two Lagging Regions • Gwangju and Jeonju regions lie in the South-Western part of the country • These two regions were neglected in investment and development plans • Population of the two regions was on the decrease since 1966 • Strong anti-government sentiment (remember the Gwangju nightmare) • Large-scale manufacturing is hardly possible for lack of good natural harbors

  15. Urban (Over) Concentration • 95% of Korean GNP is generated by urban, non-agricultural activities • 92% population live in Korea’s 74 cities and 202 urbanized towns • 89% live in urban areas • Korea’s urbanization level much exceeds that of countries with similar level of income per capita

  16. Urban Population by Size

  17. Disparity in Urban Growth • Since 1960s the number of urban areas has increased substantially • Cities of different sizes grew at different rates (1960-2000) • Over 1 million: most rapidly (40% to 53%) • Below 50000: dwindled from 22% to 2% • Seoul: 2.4 million in 1960 to 10 million in 1996

  18. Government Policies toward Seoul • Overc-oncentrated and vulnerable to North Korean artillery so the Government designed policies: • Green belt system (limits the spatial expansion of Seoul) • New capital-city plan to relocate government offices to around Daejon City • Plans to move central offices of public enterprises away from Seoul • However, waste of resources and not successful

  19. The Quest for Urban Policy • Stage of development and urban growth: • Large cities grow fastest in the early stage of development • Middle-sized cities grow fastest in the middle stages • Small cities grow fastest in the late stages • Investment according to size and stage relationship

  20. Population North/South Korea

  21. Poverty and Population Growth • Why do poor families have more children? (Africa) • Why would wealthier families prefer to have fewer children? (Western Europe) • Ever since 1962, the Korean Government’s objective was to curb the growth of population • At present growth rate of population is 0.7% • Birth control measures by the Government • Increase in employment opportunities

  22. Demographic Problems • Emphasis on education and the average number of schooling in: • 1965: 5 years • 1985: 8.6 years • 2000: 11 years • Pensioners and social welfare system • Almost no welfare system in Korea (strong family ties) • Increasing number of dependents

More Related