1 / 15

An fMRI study measuring analgesia enhanced by religion as a belief system

An fMRI study measuring analgesia enhanced by religion as a belief system. Wiech , Farias , Kahane , Shackel , Tiede , & Tracey (2008). Introduction . Stories of diminished physical pain or pain tolerance due to religious belief

cole
Download Presentation

An fMRI study measuring analgesia enhanced by religion as a belief system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An fMRI study measuring analgesia enhanced by religion as a belief system Wiech, Farias, Kahane, Shackel, Tiede, & Tracey (2008)

  2. Introduction • Stories of diminished physical pain or pain tolerance due to religious belief • Research has shown that high-level cognitive processes such as placebo-induced analgesia, emotional detachment, and perceived control over pain can reduce pain intensity. • Religious individuals → positive framing • fMRI studies and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC)

  3. Research Questions • 1. Can religious belief be shown to modulate pain in a controlled experimental setting? • 2. Is such modulation of pain by religious belief mediated by the right VLPFC?

  4. Methods • Subjects: • 12 religious (Catholic) and 12 atheist/agnostic healthy individuals • Age 19-34 • Questionnaire → All religious participants attended mass at least once/week and prayed everyday • QUESTION: Should atheists be used in the control group? • Design: • 2 x 2 factorial design • GROUP (religious vs. non-religious) → between-subject • CONDITION (religious vs.non-religious) → within-subject • “Vergine Annunciate” by Sassoferrato • “Lady with an Ermine” by da Vinci

  5. Methods • Visual stimuli: • (1) The religious image had to reliably evoke a religious mind set in believers and (2) the non-religious picture had to be sufficiently similar to the religious one in order to minimize the influence of confounding factors. • Image of Jesus may introduce confounding factors • Religious → evoked most powerful religious feelings • Non-religious → rated most similar to religious image • Procedure: • Electrical stimulation to the back of the left hand • fMRI session • Coping and familiarity rating using visual analog

  6. Procedure:

  7. Results • Pain ratings: • Significant effects for CONDITION and GROUP x CONDITION • GROUP was not significant → Religious not less sensitive to pain • Atheist group rated pain same in both conditions

  8. Results • Affectedness ratings: • Significant effects for GROUP and GROUP x CONDITION • Religious sample → more positive ratings for religious image • Atheist sample → more positive ratings for non-religious image • *Both groups indicated differences in preferred image but only religious group also indicated pain reduction when viewing preferred image

  9. Results • Coping and familiarity ratings: • Both factors and interaction significant for coping • Religious → Virgin Mary more helpful in coping • Atheist → Both pictures equally helpful • Participants rated both pictures as equally familiar. • Neuroimaging data: • No significant differences between groups for pain-related brain activation • Religious group/ religious image → significant activation in right VLPFC and pons/ventral midbrain • *Support for 2nd research question

  10. *Religious group/ Religious image

  11. Results • Neuroimaging data: • Activation in right VLPFC not due to preferential liking • → no activation for atheist group with preferred image • Pons/midbrain activation found in both groups • → likely due to preferential liking

  12. Results Right VLPFC – most strongly associated with pain intensity (negative) Pons/midbrain area – most strongly associated with affectedness (positive)

  13. Discussion • Religious individuals are able to lessen the perceived pain intensity when they are presented with a religious image. • (1) Distraction effect • (2) Motivational priming • (3) Reappraisal – a process of reinterpreting the meaning of a stimulus leading to a change in one’s emotional response to it. • → Supported by data • → Distraction and motivational priming – preferential liking should have produced a reduction in pain

  14. Discussion • Right VLPFC • Active for religious group/religious condition, leading to a decrease in perceived pain intensity • Active in previous studies of pain modulation • Pons/ventral midbrain • More strongly related to affectedness → active during preferred condition • Unknowns • Is the pain-reduction effect started by the VLPFC or is the VLPFC compelled by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex? • QUESTION: Do you think similar pain-reduction effects can occur using stimuli that are not religious in nature but have similar cultural and nurturing influences?

  15. Andes Survivors • Catholic → familiar with image of Virgin Mary • Prayed the rosary every night → Hail Mary • Likely helped the survivors cope with the pain associated with injuries from crash, hunger, and the cold.

More Related