440 likes | 569 Views
B ody M ass I ndex and Pregnancy Outcome:. Results from the revised birth certificate. Sharon Kirmeyer, Ph.D. Statistician/Demographer, Division of Vital Statistics National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
E N D
Body Mass Index and Pregnancy Outcome: Results from the revised birth certificate Sharon Kirmeyer, Ph.D.Statistician/Demographer, Division of Vital StatisticsNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention James RubertoneStatistician, Bureau of Health Statistics and ResearchPennsylvania Department of Health
Introduction • Presenting findings on Body Mass Index and pregnancy outcome, using new data from revised certificate • Historically, concern with underweight mothers and pregnancy outcome • Recently, concern also with overweight and obesity and pregnancy outcome
Obesity trends • Maps show why there is concern with obesity in U.S. • Increase in adult obesity in 20 years: from being essentially non-existent to a prevalence of >25 % in half of states • Example of obese woman= 5’4” and at least 30 pounds overweight
No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1985
No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1986
No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1987
No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1988
No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1989
No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1991
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1992
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1993
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1994
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1995
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1996
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1997
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1998
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1999
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2000
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2001
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2002
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2003
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2004
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2005
No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% 25%–29% ≥30% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2006
What Is Body Mass Index? • Based upon height and weight Formula: BMI = Weight (lb) / [height (in)]2 x 703 • Does not measure fat directly • Used to identify possible weight problems
Methods • 18 states collected 2006 data using revised birth certificate with mother’s height and weight data • Limited to singleton births (approx. 95% of all births) • Excluded records which did not have mother’s height or weight • Total 1.4 million births NOTE: All 2006 data considered preliminary
WA ME MT ND MN VT OR NH MA ID WI NY SD CT WY MI RI PA IA NJ NE NV OH DE IN IL UT DC MD CO WV VA KS MO CA KY NC TN OK AZ AR SC NM 2003 to 2006 GA AL MS TX 2007 or later LA FL AK Does not report height and weight HI States Using Revised Birth Certificate in 2006 NOTE: New York State, but not New York City
BMI Category Definitions SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1998).
Average Overweight Obese Underweight BMI distribution of Mothers18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary)
Distribution of Mothers by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary) -- Obese Overweight -- -- Underweight -- Average
Obese Overweight Average Underweight BMI Distribution by Race of Mother18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary) NH=Non-Hispanic AI/AN=American Indian/Alaska Native A/PI=Asian/Pacific Islander
Percent Preterm and Low Birthweight Infants by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary) Preterm Low Birthweight
Percent Very Preterm and Very Birthweight by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area – 2006 (preliminary) Very Preterm Very Low Birthweight percent
% 4000+ Gram Infants and Mother’s Pre-pregnancy Diabetes Status 4000+ g. infant /No pre-pregnancy diabetes 4000+ g. infant / With pre-pregnancy diabetes percent Percent of Women with 4000+ Gram Infants by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary) % 4000+ Gram Infants percent
Gestational Diabetes/Hypertension by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area – 2006 (preliminary) Gestational Diabetes Gestational Hypertension
Breech Fetal Presentation by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area – 2006 (preliminary) // 0.0
Cesarean Delivery by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area – 2006 (preliminary)
Unplanned Procedure Rates // 0.0 Unplanned Procedures by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area – 2006 (preliminary)
Average Pre-Pregnancy Weight Gain by BMI Category18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary) Underweight Average Overweight Obese // 0
Average Pre-Pregnancy Weight Gain by BMI Category and Race/Ethnicity18 State Reporting Area - 2006 (preliminary) Non-Hispanic White Underweight Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic Average Overweight Obese // 0
Summary • ½ women with singleton live births in 2006 reporting area were overweight or obese • Black and AI/AN women more likely to be obese • Risk of preterm and low birthweight elevated for infants of underweight mothers • Risk of giving birth to macrosomic (4000+ g.) infant elevated for obese women • Rates of many pregnancy risk factors, complications in delivery, and C-sections higher for obese women
Conclusion • New BMI data are very useful to show associations with maternal-infant outcomes • Can translate findings into prepregnancy practice • Slides demonstrate power of states and federal DVS working together • We look forward to working together on a paper giving more detail on this topic