680 likes | 929 Views
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Target 1: Progress and Prospects. Eimear Nic Lughadha Head of Science Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Floras. Monographs. Nature 346 August 1990. Nature 346 August 1990 IOPI Delphi October 1990. World Checklist of Myrtaceae. plant families
E N D
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Target 1: Progress and Prospects Eimear Nic Lughadha Head of Science Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Nature 346 August 1990
Nature 346 August 1990 IOPI Delphi October 1990
plant families • 102,000 accepted species • - Bibliographic details • - Synonyms • - Distribution data
Estimated global totals of known vascular plant species • Year Author No. of species • (estimated) • 1974 Stebbins 231,413 • 1992 May 270,000 • 2000 Prance et al. 320,000 • 2001 Govaerts 422,127 • Bramwell 421,968 • Scotland & Wortley 223,300
World Checklist and Bibliography of Fagales 1998
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation • Understanding and documenting plant diversity • Conserving plant diversity • Using plant diversity sustainably • Promoting education & awareness about plant diversity • Capacity building for plant diversity
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation • Kew played key role in negotiation and supporting documentation • Target 1: A widely accessible working list of all known plant species • Facilitating Organisation for Stakeholder Consultation
GSPC TARGET 1 PROGRESS • Kew with collaborators have contributed 80% of total to date • 114 collaborators in 20 different countries 13% 42 % 45%
Specialist compilers – not family specialists • Optimising use of specialists’ time – for review • Perfect should not be the enemy of the good
Reaching the Target • New Checklists • Documenting and refining methodology • Improving compilation tools • Developing prototype • Identifying user needs in detail • Articulating potential impact of checklists • Standardising source datasets: IPNI-Tropicos
Compositae and Melastomataceae • Involving more contributors • Tackling the maintenance challenge • Diversifying uptake and use • Completing the virtuous circle
Why Checklists Matter: their use and impact
How many names are there? • 0.35 million flowering plants • 1.5 million scientific plant names published • 3 million “names” incl. common misspellings
Impact 1: Very difficult to find information Information about one plant may be published under many names
Example: “Costus” or “Kut Root”Saussurea costus (Falc.) Lipschitz Root widely used in Chinese traditional medicine; • family = “Asteraceae” • many synonyms • few synonyms cited in Chinese pharmacopoeia • most frequent name in herbal literature is Aucklandia lappaDecne.
Searching with Accepted name 51 PubMed Records 215 GenBank Records
Searching witha synonym 03 PubMed Records 14 GenBank Records
Lessons • Using a scientific name does not guarantee the reliability of the information • Rarely find all published information with 1 name • within a single information source (e.g. NCBI) • especially when searching multiple sources • You may have to work hard to find all synonyms
Authoritative checklist answer questions such as: Q1: What is the correct name? Q2: How many plants in this genus? Q3: Are these names synonymous? Q4: List all synonyms for this plant?
Who uses checklists? • GenBank / GBIF / Barcode of Life • WHO / EMEA • FAO / USDA / • Development Agencies - ICRAF / CIFOR • IUCN Red Lists / WCMC / • CITES • Publishers: Biological abstracts Phytochemical dictionaries
How to measure impact? • Take one example – GenBank • Relevance to BarCode of Life
Searching NCBI: the possible outcomes today Only 7 outcomes from 40 return ALL data and avoid errors
Searching NCBI:with an authoritative names index Outcome more complete or more accurate Conclusion: 33 of the possible 40 outcomes would be more complete or more reliable