1 / 19

Galileo and the Church: Lessons Learned

Galileo and the Church: Lessons Learned. George V. Coyne, S.J. Vatican Observatory. Historical Precedents to Galileo’s Times. 384 -321 BC: Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, physics not just mathematics 130 AD: Ptolemy’s Almagest, pure math, fictitious mathematical spheres

corina
Download Presentation

Galileo and the Church: Lessons Learned

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Galileo and the Church: Lessons Learned George V. Coyne, S.J. Vatican Observatory

  2. Historical Precedents to Galileo’s Times • 384 -321 BC: Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy, physics not just mathematics • 130 AD: Ptolemy’s Almagest, pure math, fictitious mathematical spheres • 1519: Martin Luther’s break with Rome • 1543: Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus • 1546: 4th Session of the Council of Trent

  3. Main Issues Lurking • Copernicanism (heliocentrism) apparently threatened Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy and Holy Scripture • Meaning of Hypothesis • Pure mathematical expedient, Pythagorean tradition • Physics, best scientific explanation, modeling

  4. Galileo’s Telescopic Observations:SidereusNuncius(1610) • First new data in ~ 2000 years • Challenge to Aristotle & Ptolemy: Moon’s surface, sunspots, Jupiter’s moons, phases of Venus • What about Scripture? “The Scriptures teach us how to go to heaven and not how the heavens go.”

  5. 1616: JUDGMENT OF THE HOLY OFFICE • Sun-centered universe is absurd in philosophy and formally heretical since it contradicts Holy Scripture. • That the earth moves about the sun is absurd in philosophy and at least erroneous in faith

  6. Who judged? • The Holy Office, Cardinals • The Consultors of the Holy Office, Theologians

  7. PRESENT THE PRINCIPAL CHARACTERS

  8. THE FUTURE ? • Who can tell? • But there are indications: • Authority • Religious fundamentalism • Scientism

  9. The Church and Galileo: Then and Now and ? • Urban VIII (1633): Galileo gave scandal to the whole Christian world • John Paul II (1979): Galileo suffered much at the hands of the Church • John Paul II (1992): From the Galileo case one can draw a lesson . . .

  10. THE FUTURE • Authority in the Church and authority in Science • Public opinion and the community of scholars • Evolution and Intelligent Design: What would Galileo say today? • Chance or necessity? God?

  11. The great British intellectual and Roman Catholic Cardinal, John Henry Newman, stated in 1868: “The theory of Darwin, true or not, is not necessarily atheistic; on the contrary, it may simply be suggesting a larger idea of Divine Providence and Skill.”

  12. Lessons Learned • Science and religion are independent areas of human culture; best serve that culture when they dialogue in mutual respect • Church must listen to and dialogue with the sciences • The limitations of science • There is no science in Scripture • Faith and reason: conflict?

  13. Retreat

More Related