200 likes | 366 Views
Effective Regulation: A General Theory of Regulation. Dr Donald Feaver and Dr Benedict Sheehy. General Theory of Coherent Regulation. Nature of regulatory problems Overall structure of regulatory systems Nature and role of coherence Coherent Systems Approach
E N D
Effective Regulation: A General Theory of Regulation Dr Donald Feaver and Dr Benedict Sheehy
General Theory of Coherent Regulation • Nature of regulatory problems • Overall structure of regulatory systems • Nature and role of coherence • Coherent Systems Approach • Problematisation: organising problem • Framing and policy • Structure • Substantive • Compliance Information Technology Services
Regulation • Regulation is controversial • Effort to change human behaviour is usually controversial • Conflicting ideas of rights and duties • Conflicting ideas of role of government • Complexity in ideas of problems • Complexity in social living • Lack of clarity between political and technical aspects of regulation Information Technology Services
Regulation: Defined • Regulation is a political response of government • Invokes the tools of government (authority, treasure and organisation) “carrots, sticks and sermons” • To solve a problem or create an opportunity Information Technology Services
Regulation: Organising Problem • Regulation is NOT • Simple command and control with respect to risks • Regulation is a response to: • Socially constructed and identified phenomena • Where • Attention drawn to phenomena • Powerful people agree: • 1) that it is an issue; • 2) that a response is desirable; and • 3) that a regulatory response is desirable • Such socially constructed phenomena that has attracted attention for which regulatory response may be called is referred to as the “Organising Problem” Information Technology Services
Regulation: Organising Problem • Types of organising problems • Social, collective problem • Risk • Opportunity • Some aspect of 1 or more Information Technology Services
Organising Problem: Normative issues • What should be done? • Why should something be done? • Why not leave it? • Moral imperative: • “we should protect our society/ people” or • “we should ensure people have the opportunity” or • “there is an opportunity for our society if…and we should…” • What are the implications of these norms? • Normative: Political—norm explication and consensus • Positive: Regulatory—development of a regulatory system coherent with the norms Information Technology Services
Political Dimension • Politicians • Decide whether to regulate • Frame the organising problem: collective problem, risk, opportunity • Frame the normative dimension on the basis of the framing of the problem • Mobilise political support • Create policy Information Technology Services
Politics and Cultural Dimension • Full understanding of the problem is difficult. Therefore: • Rely on cultural evaluation of events • Rely on experts, but not all • People who we can trust—people like ourselves in worldview • culture, politics and economics • Different from our view is “dirty” and “immoral” (Douglas 1966)/ positive = normative • We select for regulatory attention—i.e. construct organising problems—according to our worldview • Seek to reflect and reinforce worldview (Douglas and Wildavsky 1990) Culture and Cognition Information Technology Services
Positive Dimension • Technical issues • Structural layer • Substantive layer • Operational layer Information Technology Services
Structure • Control structures • Centralised • De-centered • Distributed • Delegated and Private Information Technology Services
Structure • Accountability mechanisms • Government • Judicial Review • Markets and managers Information Technology Services
Substantive Coherence • Governance mechanisms • Functions • Jurisdictional authority • Powers Information Technology Services
Operational Coherence • Compliance • Cognitive compliance • Explicit aspects of compliance • Enforcement Information Technology Services
Thank you Information Technology Services