1 / 23

Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates

Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates. Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT. eRHIC (Linac-ring version). Requires a polarized electron source with an extremely high current ( at least 50 mA). Average current of tens or even hundreds of mA is required

craig
Download Presentation

Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT

  2. eRHIC (Linac-ring version) Requires a polarized electron source with an extremely high current ( at least 50 mA). • Average current of tens or even hundreds of mA is required • Modern state-of-the-art guns produce ~100-200 A • Average current of ~ 1 mA achieved in tests at JLab and Mainz; lifetime ~ 20 h • Average current of up to 10 mA achieved at Mainz with very short lifetime (needs active cathode cooling) Main problem – ion backbombardment

  3. Ion damage mostly the center of cathode (Bates results) Damage pattern Laser beam profile

  4. The principal points to achieve high average current: • Large area cathode. • Ions tend to damage the central area of the cathode – ring-shaped emission pattern. • Active cathode cooling. • Very small beam losses could be allowed near the gun ( ). High Intensity Polarized Electron Gun

  5. Phase I results: beam simulations. Three different initial emitting pattern were used: Ring-shaped Gaussian Flat The pictures represent the beam shape 400 mm from the cathode.

  6. Beam line. Pipe aperture ~±34 mm. Beam dump Dipoles Solenoidal lenses Gun

  7. Losses estimates It is difficult to get a correct shape of the tails in regular simulations. Special simulations with electrons emitted only from the edge of the cathode (r>11.8 mm) have been performed. The resulting tail can be approximated by Gaussian distribution: Results for the ring-shaped beam at the entrance into the first dipole. r0=4.9 mm, σ=1.9 mm. Aperture is about 30 mm. Similar calculations have been performed in several different locations in the beam line with all three initial emitting pattern. No substantial beam losses have been discovered.

  8. Ion distribution Simplification: the cross section ionization was independent of electron energy. Electron current profile Ion current profile Ion energy profile

  9. Interesting problem - beam dump Water cooling Beam Current monitor I~50 mA → P~6 kW !!! Outgasing in the dump could be serious problem. PUMPS

  10. Biased beam dump (energy recovery) -120 kV Gun power supply Isolated 1 kV power supply Electron energy in the dump drops from 120 kV to 1 kV. Heating power in the dump drops from 10 kW to 100 W Gun Beam line -119 kV 100 W in the dump still needs to be removed, and now dump is at 120 kV ! Needs fluorinert chiller. Beam dump

  11. HV Coolant in Coolant out Manipulator Crystal Cathode Laser Cathode Cooling Test Chamber

  12. Cathode – anode assembly Fluorinert (cooling agent)

  13. Cathode – anode assembly Fluorinert (cooling agent)

  14. Cathode – anode assembly

  15. Pack with a crystal

  16. Heat exchanger

  17. Preparation chamber

  18. General assembly – top view MANIPULATORS PREP. CHAMBER LENSES LOAD LOCK SECOND DIPOLE GUN

  19. General assembly – top view PREP. CHAMBER GUN LOAD LOCK FIRST DIPOLE

  20. Tests results in the cathode cooling chamber • Vacuum manipulations works very well: excellent illumination with internal halogen bulbs, good visibility, reliable pack transfer. • High Voltage: processed the chamber to 125 kV, but electrical discharges happened. The ceramic pipes need better protection from the electrons produced by cold emission. • Temperature control: the pack temperature could be held at below 25°C even at the maximum laser power available (about 34 W on the crystal)

  21. Vacuum features of the gun chamber • 100 l/s Ion pump with 400 l/s NEG. • 4 additional 400 l/s NEGs (only two are currently installed). • The chamber walls are thin (~ 3 mm) to reduce outgasing. • The chamber and most of the parts have been prebaked to 400°C before the final assembly. • Bake-out at 250°C after the final assembly. • RGA readings after bake-out:

  22. HV processing • The operating voltage is 120 kV • The gun was processed to 150 kV • After the processing no activity (measurable dark current, vacuum increase) could be detected at 120 kV • The Fluorinert produces virtually zero conductivity (unable to measure).

  23. Current status • The gun chamber: built and tested. It was vented 3 weeks ago to install the first dipole followed the gate valve and 2 additional NEGs. Rebaked and HV reprocessed. • The preparation chamber: design is completed, the main chamber has been manufactured, many parts are already ordered. • Load lock – the design is in progress. • Beam line – conceptual design is completed, some parts are designed, the dipole vacuum chambers have been manufactured.

More Related