160 likes | 317 Views
The changing higher education landscape: Establishing a new identity during an institutional incorporation. Eduard Fourie Department of Psychology Unisa. ‘Unisa and TSA are the two elephants, they are making the love. . . and VUDEC is the lawn on which they are making the love’.
E N D
The changing higher education landscape: Establishing a new identity during an institutional incorporation Eduard Fourie Department of Psychology Unisa
‘Unisa and TSA are the two elephants, they are making the love. . . and VUDEC is the lawn on which they are making the love’
Human Resource implications • ‘People our greatest resource’ seldom appears to inform merger practices • Little attention: • reaction of employees • stress employees experience
Six theoretical approachesanxiety theory, social identity theory, acculturation theory, role conflict theory, job characteristics theory, and organisational justice theory (Seo and Hill 2005)
Social identity theory • Social groups form significant part of self-concept • Individual to a greater or lesser extent think, act and have feelings consistent with group • Institutional identity – particular form of social identity • Associates with membership of a specific institution or unit • Strong identification with the institution generally desirable for the well-being of the institution and its members • a strong workgroup identification in the pre-merger phase may lead to negative feelings about the merger
Mergers alter employees’ identification • Those from the incorporated institution – may go through a state of cultural shock (Stahl and Sitkin 2001) • Dysfunctional culture classes may lead to us and them dynamics (Giessner et al. 2006)
Longitudinal study into well-being of employees • 2004 - 2008 • Unstructured interviews with 24 participants • Ages of participants between 35 and 60 years • Years of appointment varied from 1 to 18 years • Theoretical sampling – participants from governance (1), academic (12), administrative (7) departments, and HR consultants (4) • Individual & focus group interviews • Participation on voluntary basis
Thematic analysis • Inductive approach in identifying themes (Patton 1990) • Aim of analysis to proceed with coding of data without trying to fit it into pre-existing coding frames (Braun and Clarke 2006) • Or into my own analytical preconceptions • Acknowledge my own interest and experience provided ‘fore-having’, fore-sight’ and fore-conception’ (Heidegger 1962) • Coded extracts of data – meaningful groups – potential themes - thematic maps – thematic network (Attride-Stirling 2001)
Themes • Various themes came to the fore and were more evident during different stages of the four year incorporation process • Two global themes: • institutional culture • identification with the new institution • Divided into three levels • Individual • Group • Institutional
VUDEC: Family affair Legacies, traditions & patterns Institutional culture Unisa: Us & Them Communication Management Negotiations Establishing new position Support Identification with the new institution Impact on self Unfinished business Maintaining new positions Current status Future prospects A thematic map of general, basic, and global themes
Institutional culture: Us & Them • Difficult to leave the old and familiar behind • Personal experiences varied drastically • Phasing out of VUDEC’s programmes • Negotiating new positions • Valued new opportunities • Old loyalties remain • Incorporator institution more powerful • Difficult to become part of established work-groups • Constant comparison of the old with the new • Stormy history of VUDEC & transformation in the general higher education landscape • Speedy transformation on managerial level • Concerns about transformation on middle management and departmental levels • All role players are effected
Identification with the new institution • Establishing and maintaining positions • Facilitated or hampered by various factors • Academics in better positions • Administrative employees intense uncertainty • Uncertain times, inadequate guidance and communication – not new to VUDEC employees • Getting use to new ways of functioning and new structures • the whole process was far more smooth than one would have expected • I’m still testing the waters • Vista is still with us • Acknowledgement that employees of Unisa & TSA are also influenced • Time will tell whether the new Unisa will continue to be a major role player in HE in RSA
Concluding remarks • Us & them • Racial and power relations • Sense of continuity • Communication • Accepting the changes • HE landscape & national landscape not stagnant
Only time will tell whether the divorce from the old and the re-partnering of the three institutions will lead to a successful blended family
References • Attride-Stirling, J. 2001. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research 1: 385–405. • Bartels, J., R. Douwes, M. de Jong and A. Pruyn. 2006. Organizational identification during a merger: Determinants of employees’ expected identification with the new organization. British Journal of Management 17 (s1): S49–S67. • Braun, V. and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. • Giessner, S. R., G. T Viki, S. Otten, D. J. Terry and S. Täuber. 2006. The challenge of merging: Merger patterns, premerger status, and merger support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32: 339–352. • Haslam, S. A. 2004. Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage. • Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper and Evanston. • Lotz, T. and F. Donald. 2006. Stress and communication across job levels after an acquisition. South African Journal of Business Management 37 (1): 1–8. • Nalbantien, H. R., R. A. Guzzo, D. Kieffer and J. Doherty. 2005. Making acquisitions work. Journal of Organizational Excellence 24 (2): 45–52. • Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. • Schuler, R. and S. Jackson. 2001. HR issues and activities in mergers and acquisitions. European Management Journal 19 (3): 239–253. • Seo, M.-G. and N. S. Hill 2005. Understanding the human side of merger and acquisition: An integrative framework. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41: 422–443. • Stahl, G. K. and S. B. Sitkin. 2001. Trust in mergers and acquisitions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, D.C. • Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner. 1986. The social of identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Psychology of intergroup relations, ed. S. Worchel and W. G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson. • Van Dick, R. 2001. Identification and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews 3: 265–283. • Van Dick, R., J. Ullrich and P. A. Tissington. 2006. Working under a black cloud: How to sustain organizational identification after a merger. British Journal of Management 17 (s1): S69–S79.