160 likes | 177 Views
THE ROLE AND DUTIES OF THE External evaluator. Support to strengthening the higher education system in azerbaidjan. 2019. Training session N0.2 Eliane Kotler Michelle Houppe. The peer-review. The peer-review.
E N D
THE ROLE AND DUTIES OF THE Externalevaluator • Support to strengthening the highereducation system in azerbaidjan • 2019 • Training session N0.2 • Eliane Kotler • Michelle Houppe
The peer-review Definition: Key principle of self-regulationestablished by a profesionnalsector or evaluation process requiring the participation of qualified people in a certain domain. Peer Person withsame social situation, same qualifications or position as the otherpersoninvolved in the process. + - Sharedunderstanding Peers ≠ friends Acceptability « smallfamily» Collegiality
The peerreview Externalevaluator Evaluation ExternalQuality Control Inspection Mutualtrust Evaluated bodies 2 key words: to be strict and fair…
Thepeerreview Evaluation Audit Definition Quality audit: Evaluation thatfocusesonly on QA mechanisms of the evaluated body. Much more specialized
The peerreview • You are not: You are an external EVALUATOR:
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES • OBJECTIVITY • Impartiality • RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY • CONFIDENTIALITY • fairness • collABORATION • PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Evaluation
Ethicalprinciples • + • OBJECTIVITY • Impartiality • Respect for diversity • Confidentiality • Fairness • COLLABORATION • • No personal opinion • no interest, no INFLUENCE • No single model • No public disclosure, no gossip • No favoritism, no discrimination • NO STAR SYSTEM
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES IMPARTIALITY = CHECK ANY CONFLICT OF INTEREST
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES Evidence-basedfindings= fair report LOOK FOR FACTS AND FIGURES RELY ON STANDARDS
The peerreview INDEPENDANCE Evaluation ANO Evaluation Higher Education Institutions Decision
EXPECTATIONS/ THE EXPERT • BEFORE THE SITE VISIT • Read the SER with attention • Prepareyour questions/comments, based on the tasksrepartition and the planning but alsoyourgeneral feeling • Have a clearoverview of the situation of the evaluatedentity + the missing information /evaluationframework Prepare a dedicatedsheet/ form per session and /or for each area of the evaluationframework
EXPECTATIONS/ THE EXPERT • 2. DURING THE SITE VISIT • Attend the meeting and pay attention to the discussions • Be neutral and do not judge the people interviewed • Ask the questions youneed for your contribution to the report, but short questions are better • Make sure youget the evidenceyouwillneed • No direct feedback to the interviewed, no criticism • No repeatingwhat the former interviewedtoldyou ! Check yourdedicatedsheet/ form Ask questions and take notes Yourroleis to behelpful !
Example of an interview file : AUL Azuniversity of languages
EXPECTATIONS/ THE EXPERT • 3. AFTER THE SITE VISIT • Sum up your notes and compare to yourneeds • Draftyour contribution • No personalization, no direct criticalview on a person • Giveyour opinion/feedback on the others’ contribution • Contribute to the conclusion of the report • Contribute to the accreditationproposal Start writingasap Be evaluative but provideevidences