890 likes | 904 Views
Learn about the MASH event held on 28th February 2013, where leaders discussed the vision to ensure vulnerable people are safe and free from abuse through information sharing and collaborative decision-making.
E N D
MASH Event King’s Hall 28 February 2013
Welcome and Introductions
Eleanor Brazil Interim Director, Children and Young People’s Services Stoke-on-Trent City Council
Mick Harrison Commissioner for Community Safety Staffordshire County Council
Our Vision Vulnerable people and their families within Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent are able to live safe lives, free from abuse and neglect or the risk of abuse and neglect through an integrated approach to sharing of information, collaborative decision making, in order that proportionate interventions are justified at the earliest opportunity across the partnership.
2002- Jessica Chapman & Holly Wells 1945- Dennis O’Neil 1984- Jasmine Beckford 2000 - Lauren Wright 2000 – Victoria Climbié 1994 - Rikki Neave 1973 – Maria Colwell 2007 - Baby Peter 6
MASH in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent • Over 1 million people • Increase in Adults / Children Referrals • Three key partners:- • 2 upper tier authorities (SOT & SCC) • Staffordshire Police • Health architecture • Fiscal issues • Business case?
Key Issues • Leadership (political / organisational) • Governance • Lead Commissioner • Information governance • Legal / Collaborative agreements • Relationship building / Partnership work
Challenges • Increase in demand • Integration / Interoperability • Continuing fiscal challenges • Performance management • Further integration • Provider / Commissioner split
‘Hold your nerve’ ‘It’s worth it’
Nichola Glover-Edge Portfolio Manager Staffordshire County Council
How did we make it happen? • Strategic buy-in from all partners involved with leaders actively engaged in the project process. • One Lead Officer across the partnership • Leads from each partner being held to account for the successful delivery of the MASH, ensuring the project progressed at pace.
How did we make it happen? • Dedicated operational managers and staff making it happen, unblocking issues and mobilising resources to deliver the project. • Drive, passion and enthusiasm from operational staff within the MASH to make it a success. • Dedicated project management capacity to coordinate activity and resources to ensure that the project is delivered to cost, within budget and on time.
Project Management • The Transformation Support Unit (TSU) is operated by the County Council and offers the delivery of high quality, professional design and project management services to facilitate the delivery of transformation within all service areas. • The resources that the TSU offered to the MASH project were as follows:- • Nichola Glover-Edge: Portfolio Manager • SanjeetBains: Project Manager • Mark Cocker: Senior Business Designer
Timescales • The TSU inherited the MASH project in August 2011 and took remedial action to ensure its delivery date of December 2011. • The MASH project was handed back to business as usual in July 2012.
Project Scope • The project scope for establishing a Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub. • Ensuring the MASH has a physical space to operate. • Set-up and ongoing costs between partners • Corporate governance arrangements are in place • HR issues are identified and addressed • Joint OD plan is developed and delivered
Project Scope • Telephony infrastructure is designed and delivered for the MASH • ICT hardware and software is designed and delivered for the MASH • Information Governance procedures are in place • Operational procedures/flow are in place • The statutory duty of all partner agencies is met • All stakeholders are communicated with
Governance Strategic Leadership Group Steering Group Workstreams Operations Performance Accommodation Information & Governance Legal & Finance HR OD Communications
Challenges • Mechanism for sharing information • Building confidence in sharing information • IT and telecommunication infrastructure • Driving through issues • Culture and Organisation Development • HR and Vetting
Lessons Learned • Fostering partnership and building a trusting relationship takes time. • Earlier engagement of health. • Resource commitment agreed from each partner agency.
Lessons Learned • Recommend co-location prior to making the MASH operational – a one size does not always fit all. • Engagement with partner IT teams/Expertise is key to delivering ICT work packages • Ensuring attendees at groups have the delegated decision making authority.
Executive Summary
DCI Helen Jones Protecting Vulnerable People Staffordshire Police
Police Social Services Health Culture
Red to Green Statistics not outcomes Internal status Conflict in ‘performance’ But.. Police
Executive Officer support, the profile of Safeguarding is being promoted at every opportunity.
Vital ingredients to a successful and harmonious working environment.
Escalation Policy User Group meeting
Maslow Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Abraham Maslow ‘A Theory of Human Motivation’ 1943
Motivator • Motivator – Hygiene theory • Motivator Factors • Achievement , Recognition, Work Itself, Responsibility, Promotion, Growth • Hygiene Factors • Pay and Benefits, Company Policy and Administration, Relationships with co-workers, Physical Environment, Supervision, Status, Job Security
Integration, some history….. 2009/10 Co-location Ethos – One Team, One MASH Open communication in real time under agreed MoU Integration – some history
Integration – the challenges Integration, the challenges…. • IT • Individuality Interoperability, a more realistic position for the medium term
DI Dan Ison MASH Officer Staffordshire Police
Organisation Development • Purpose • People • Location • Systems/Processes • Performance
Vision and Strategy • Vision Statement • 5 year Vision • Single Organisation?
Values and Culture • Relationships • Joint Training • Staff Engagement/Joint Communications
Style and Leadership • Escalation and Resolve • Information Sharing Protocols • One Defined Leader?
Structure • Governance – Decision Making • Parent Policy vs MASH Policy • MASH Future Development Plans
Systems • Communications • Incompatibility • Operating Principles/Performance Framework
Staff • Resource Numbers • Cohorts of Work • Staff Engagement • Skills – Mutual Understanding
David Stringfellow Head of Responsive Services Staffordshire County Council
The MASH concept … Easier said than done • Challenge of coordinating change • No one agency can act unilaterally
Establish the means of communication Create methods to enable immediate review and decision-making Involve interested people MASH - weekly operational meetings Service managers and key operational staff represented Managing Risk Responsiveness vs Inclusivity Dynamic and responsive leadership is critical How is change managed in this environment
Autonomy to lead on a day-to-day basis Practitioners empowered to make decisions Bottom up approach Support given from above where needed Stakeholder inclusion achieved and maintained Trust the operational teams
Get the right personalities in the right place Need to see the bigger picture Good interpersonal skills required Need to understand the detail of each other’s business Other Considerations