1 / 11

The economics of livestock disease: Farmer choices

The economics of livestock disease: Farmer choices. Governance of Livestock Disease SVEPM 01 April 2009. Why do farmers manage disease the way they do?. The conventional view (rational choice) : Resource endowment and optimum choice;

csheetz
Download Presentation

The economics of livestock disease: Farmer choices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The economics of livestock disease: Farmer choices Governance of Livestock Disease SVEPM 01 April 2009

  2. Why do farmers manage disease the way they do? • The conventional view (rational choice): • Resource endowment and optimum choice; • Farmers as autonomous decision makers who take the world around them as given; • Implication: Behaviour and choice viewed as equivalent

  3. Why, contd. • Behavioural view: • Farmers’ decision making subject to influences from outside (e.g., peers, Vets, legislation...) • The psychology of economic decision making; • farmer’s own belief, compliance with social convention and degree of control over resources and circumstances. • Implication: divergence between choice and behaviour;

  4. Why, contd. • A network view: • Individual farmersare linked with each other in a network of relationships; • A farmer’s decision to link with others or not to made on cost-benefit considerations; • a three-way network interaction assumed among • Structure- e.g., of contact • Behaviour – e.g., mode of disease management • Epidemiology – e.g., prevalence,

  5. Evaluation • Each view has a contribution to make to the understanding of farmers’ current disease management; • Veterinary drugs and medicine e.g., Every disease management associated with a certain cost of drugs (“what is” question); • Issue of disease management adoption can be viewed an econo-psychological/network problem (why and how questions); • How much drug to buy can be viewed as an optimization problem;

  6. Economic models of infectious animal disease: lit. audit • Conventional modelling – costs and benefits of disease incidence and management, growth models, partial/general equilibrium, etc • Game-theoretic models, e.g., Incomplete information – uncertainty, herding • Public goods and other externalities - market response, reputation effects, risk (re)allocation; • Nash equilibrium – impossibility of eradication under self-motivated behaviour; inefficiency of outcome • Network structures • Key questions: efficiency vs. stability, multiplicity, dynamics

  7. Conceptual frameworks at GoLD • Economic epidemiology’s thesis: the cyclicality of disease prevalence, an example • Environmental factors increase disease prevalence; • Increased prevalence places a burden on farmers initially; • Farmers influence the level of disease prevalence ultimately; • Behavioural laxity leads to resurgence of disease, and the cycle repeats;

  8. Conceptual frameworks at GoLD 2 Biosecurity and Network structure • The natural view of this model is of animals becoming ill and recovering; • An alternative centres on farmers: as animals fall ill, farmers • Notice illness and respond with treatment; • e.g. susceptible farms drop links with infected farms (inward biosecurity) and vice versa (outward biosecurity); • This influences the distribution of disease prevalence (of endemicity) within a country

  9. Current Empirical frameworks at GoLD • Testing whether public incentive mechanisms are compatible with farmers’ incentives for disease control; • Testing for farmers’ behavioural response to changes in disease prevalence; • Testing for the existence of networks using bio-economic data

  10. Research plans • Panel estimates of three-way interaction; • Policy impact assessment; • Agent-based simulation; • Model-supported scenario development and gaming

  11. What and how much do we know about farmers? • Are farmers autonomous in their decision-making? • Do social networks influence farmer behaviour? • Do farmers respond to changes in endemic disease prevalence rates? • Do compensation mechanisms influence the degree of farmers’ disease control?

More Related