1 / 19

WHO / OGAC In-country: MoH & WHO Academic Institutions:

WHO / OGAC In-country: MoH & WHO Academic Institutions: Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium Partners in Health / Harvard Medical School. Task Shifting “Clinical Mapping” Multi-country study. Approach. Desk work:

csilla
Download Presentation

WHO / OGAC In-country: MoH & WHO Academic Institutions:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WHO / OGAC In-country: MoH & WHO Academic Institutions: Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium Partners in Health / Harvard Medical School Task Shifting“Clinical Mapping”Multi-country study

  2. Approach • Desk work: • Previous experiences with « delegation of clinical tasks to non-doctors » in Primary Health Care programs (mainly 1980s) • Conceptualisation of task shifting • Tools for field visits • Field visits: to document experiences with innovative provider cadres in HIV care: Malawi, Uganda, Ethiopia, Haiti & Rwanda

  3. Results from desk work • Framework • Types of task shifting • Evaluations done • Conditions for successful task shifting

  4. 4 main types of task shifting • Type I: from doctors to non-physician clinicians (clinical officers, medical assistants, physician-assistants, nurse-practitioners, …) • Type II: from clinicians to nurses • Type III: … to nursing aids, lay providers (including counsellors), community health workers • Type IV: self-management by PLHAs

  5. Type III Need to further separate Type III: • Depending on prior diploma: range: university graduates – primary school • Counsellors, becoming a new professional group • Nursing tasks • Clinical tasks = Lay providers, including « expert patients »

  6. Type I Type III Type II Type III Type III

  7. Prior experience? • Type I: non-physician clinicians in primary health care (PHC) • Type II: = happening in many (peripheral) places • Type III: • Community health workers = lay providers • Counsellors = quite new to HIV/AIDS • Expert patients = quite new… • Type IV: self-management (diabetes &c)

  8. Evaluations of task shifting • Non-physician clinicians = very positive • Community health workers (study UWC) can work « under certain conditions! » • Still less firm evidence for recent innovations e.g. • « Nurse-based ART delivery » • « Expert patients »

  9. Task shifting: 4 basic conditions • Initial training • Basic diploma • Specific pre-service training • Guidelines / protocoles (simplification) • Continuing education • Supervision • Coaching • Refresher courses • Remuneration / career structure

  10. Multi-country study • Main objective: documenting ‘best practices’ in task shifting for clinical HIV care • In each country: • Inventory of all types of health cadre + training • General information on HIV, health system, HRH, AIDS programme, … • Selection of ART delivery sites: ‘best practices’ (+ ‘routine practices’)

  11. Field visits to ART sites Questionnaires: • For different cadre: detailed documentation of which cadre is actually performing which tasks (mainly interview, some observation) • For each facility: • info on patients, on outcomes, … • Inventory of staff + FTE for ART

  12. Expected results? • Detailed insight in task shifting: • Which tasks? by whom? • Consistent? • Priorities? • Workload (FTE staff) for ART • Conditions for enabling task shifting • Outcomes? (with task shifting)

  13. « Bonus » material

More Related