240 likes | 257 Views
Assessment of the CFSv2 real-time seasonal forecasts for 2017. Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA. Relevance. Diagnostics/monitoring of CFS real-time forecasts. Real-time skill assessment Improve forecast through post-processing Impact of initial condition
E N D
Assessment of the CFSv2 real-time seasonal forecasts for 2017 Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA
Relevance Diagnostics/monitoring of CFS real-time forecasts • Real-time skill assessment • Improve forecast through post-processing • Impact of initial condition • Systematic errors
Outline • SST indices • Spatial maps • Anomaly correlation skill • Prediction of sea ice extent minimum
SST indices Nino34 • Delayed transition of ENSO phases at longer lead-time DMI • Failed to reproduce positive DMI in 2012 and 2015 at 3-6 month lead • Good forecast for 2016 negative DMI. • Failed to reproduce positive DMI in spring 2017 at 6 month lead MDR • Too warm for Jan-Sep 2014 for 3 and 6 month lead. Too cold after Oct 2014 till early 2015. • False warm anomalies during spring 2016 Nino34 DMI MDR
CFSv2 Nino34 SST with PDF correction • Slight improvement in ensemble mean and spread with PDF correction.
2. Spatial maps Anomaly = Total – Clim1999-2010 CFSv2 forecast is at a lead of 20 days or so. For example, forecast for Jun-Jul-Aug is from initial conditions of May 1-10th. Impacts of atmospheric initial conditions should be largely removed.
Forecast for MAM 2017 • Stronger SSTA amplitude in the eastern Pacific. • Unrealistic rainfall pattern in the tropics.
Forecast for MAM 2017 • Model produces an ENSO response in T2m anomalies in North America which does not appear in the observation. Model also failed to predict the strong warm anomalies in the Eurasia. • For Z200, CFSv2 captured the tropical positive anomalies but failed to produce the observed anomalies in mid-high latitudes.
Forecast for JJA 2017 • Reasonable SST anomalies in the tropics but unrealistic negative anomalies in the high-latitudes, possible related to sea ice errors. • Rainfall anomaly pattern in the Indo-West Pacific is incorrect..
Forecast for JJA 2017 • CFSv2 forecast ensemble mean T2m warm anomalies are weak and do not show a good resemblance to the observed pattern. • For Z200, CFSv2 captured the tropical positive anomalies but failed to produce the observed anomalies in mid-high latitudes
Forecast for SON 2017 • Negative SST anomalies in the Indian Ocean and Pacific are too weak, but the rainfall anomaly pattern looks quite reasonable.
Forecast for SON 2017 • CFSv2 forecasted T2m warm anomaly patterns was not shown in the observations. • CFSv2 did capture the observed Z200 wave patterns in the mid-high latitudes.
Forecast for DJF 2017/2018 • Stronger SST anomaly amplitude in the tropics. • Reasonable rainfall pattern in the Pacific but incorrect rainfall anomaly sign in the Indian Ocean.
Forecast for DJF 2017/2018 • CFSv2 produced a reasonable T2m anomaly pattern in North America except for Greenland. CFSv2 failed to produce the observed T2m anomaly pattern in Eurasian continent. • CFSv2 failed to capture the observed Z200 anomaly pattern in the mid-high latitudes.
Pattern correlation over tropical Indian Ocean 20S-20N • SST skill in 2017 is about 0.4. • Rainfall skill is low • DMI amplitude is lower than observed.
Pattern correlation over tropical Pacific 20S-20N • Tropical Pacific SST correlation in 2017 reasonably high but rainfall correlations during spring and summer 2017 is low. • The observed amplitude is relatively small in 2017. • 2017 Nino34 SST from the CFSv2 is reasonable.
Pattern correlation over tropical Atlantic 20S-20N • SST correlation is between 0 and 0.4 in 2017. • Rainfall prediction skill is low. • SST and rainfall varibility is weak • MRD index in CFSv2 is reasonable.
Pattern correlation over NH 20N-80N • T2m overall skill over NA in 2017 was not high and fluctuating. • Forecast skill over NA is generally higher than that over Eurasia. • Precipitation skill is also very low. • Z200 skill in 2017 is higher than precipitation andT2m but changeable with time. • Evolution of precipitation skill is more fluctuating and lower than T2m and Z200.
CFSv2 predicted sea ice extent for September 2016 (106 km2) Obs=4.63 • CFSv2 raw data contains large errors • Bias correction based on 1997-2010 hindcasts helps but the corrected sea ice extent is still too large except for the forecast from August 2017 • Bias correction based on more recent years (2008-2016) further reduced the error for March to July forecasts but overcorrected the forecast from August, which is probably related to the year-to-year bias change the initial state (slide 24), making it difficult to make a reliable bias correction.
Differences in sea ice extent between CFSR and NASA Team analysis (106 km2) • Significant jumps in 1997 and 2008 • The resulting time-dependent systematic bias in forecast is difficult to remove • The differences were changeable after 2008. • Use 2008-2016 mean bias would result in an over-correction for 2017 forecast.