1 / 14

Angular resolution of LAT

TESLA Workshop on Forward Calorimetry Cracow, 10 October 2003. Angular resolution of LAT. Agnieszka Kowal University of Science and Technology, Cracow. Agenda. LAT geometry angle reconstruction method different reconstruction schemes results from each reconstruction approach

cterri
Download Presentation

Angular resolution of LAT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TESLA Workshop on Forward Calorimetry Cracow, 10 October 2003 Angular resolution of LAT Agnieszka Kowal University of Science and Technology, Cracow

  2. Agenda • LAT geometry • angle reconstruction • method • different reconstruction schemes • results • from each reconstruction approach • resolution in  and  • summary and outlook

  3. Detector Layout • rightside longitudinal cross section view of the detector • LAT distance from the IP 305-325 cm • LAT radial dimensions 8-28 cm • angular coverage • 26.2<<82 mrad • 0<<360 deg

  4. Simulated LAT Structure • Si/W calorimeter • 8/16/20/32/64/128 concentrical cylinders (in r) • 30 rings (in z) • 24/48 sectors (in ) • analyzed angular range: • 30<<78 mrad • 0<<360 deg

  5. Angle reconstruction method • average over all LAT cells • polar angle reconstruction • azimuthal angle reconstruction

  6. Angle reconstruction schemes •  reconstruction • from all rings (all readout channels) • from alternate rings with different # of cylinders (to improve linearity) • from odd rings only (reduction of readout channels) •  reconstruction • as above for 24 or 48 sectors 8/32 cylinders in odd/even rings

  7. reconstruction from all rings • „oscillations” around linear dependence due to detector granularity fade for 32 cylinders and more • resolution in  about 0.2 mrad

  8.  reconstruction from alternate rings with 8 and 32 cylinders • compared with  reconstruction from all rings with 20 cylinders (same number of readout channels) • linearity „oscillations” still present • resolution worse than expected

  9.  reconstruction from odd rings • good linearity for 32 or more cylinders • problems with  resolution • unexpected events outside the  peak spoil the resolution • these events cut out „mechanically”

  10. LAT resolution in  as a function of the # of cylinders 24 sectors 48 sectors •  obtained from all and odd rings are in agreement •  RMS value constant for 32 or more cylinders •  bias is smaller with 48 sectors

  11.  reconstruction for 24 and 48 sectors • linearity „oscillations” due to detector granularity smaller for 48 sectors • good resolution as expected • same problems with  resolution for odd ring readout as for 

  12. LAT resolution in  as a function of the # of cylinders •  obtained from all and odd rings are in agreement • no dependence of the RMS on the # of cylinders •  resolution better with 48 sectors 24 sectors 48 sectors

  13. Summary • angular resolution (mean and RMS) constant in  and  for 32 and more cylinders in LAT • better resolution in  and  for 48 sectors • good reconstruction linearity • readout from odd rings only would allow reduction of readout channels with no effect on the resolution • closer look needed at the few events outside the  and  peaks for odd ring readout • best choice: 32 cylinders (odd ring readout) and 48 sectors – 23040 readout channels

  14. Outlook • the obtained resolution in  is far from the assumed 1 rad • increased statistics would improve the RMS both for  and  • the bias of  is probably a matter of the applied reconstruction algorithm • more work and carefull checks must be done

More Related