150 likes | 159 Views
HBr 6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions. https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf :. 7. 6. 2, 1,0. 8. Idea See slides below). https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf :. https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf :. From Q lines.
E N D
HBr 6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions
https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf: 7 6........... 2, 1,0 8 Idea See slides below)
https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf: From Q lines DE(J´,J´-1) This differs a lot from Longs Results (Why?): J´ https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512ak.pxp
https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf:
Is this peak split? Are these J´= 0 and 1 peaks In which case J´=8 Is this Br Atomic Line? ? https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512aka.pxp
https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-240512aka.xls: It could be that there are two peaks In this are in which case j’ increases by one In which case the highest J´observed is indeed J´=8 But not J´=7(?) DE(J´,J´-1) !! J´ https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp
Fig. 4 for HBr-New States-paper: Energetics: https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-240512ak.xls
V1S+(v´=m+18) : Energy / cm-1 Near-reonance Interaction J´ E1S+(n=6; v´=0) 8 8 7 Off-reonance Interactions 2 V1S+(v´=m+17) 6pp3S-(v´=0) https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512ak.pxp and PPT file for Fig.4 in HBr-New States-paper
http://www.raunvis.hi.is/~agust/rempisvaedidir/JCP01755.pdf: • DnJ,J+1 = 2(B´-B´´)J´ + 2(B´-B´´) for Q lines • a = b (slope = intersect)
a(intersect)= = -15.145 ± 4.46 b(slope) = -11.788 ± 1.24 i.e. for J´=0 J´+1 = 1 ! J´ a = -3.3571 ± 5.53 b = -11.788 ± 1.24 J´ https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp
a = 8.4307 ± 6.66 b = -11.788 ± 1.24 This is what one expected to give closes a and b values Skip top and bottom points https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp
a = -25.886 ± 3.36 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 a = -17.456 ± 4.3 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 This is what one expected to give closes a and b values https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp
a = -9.026 ± 5.27 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 Closest values for slope and intersect ERGO: J´min = 3, J+1 =4! a = -0.596 ± 6.25 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp
Large variation in the match of “a” and “b” depending on what peaks are taken account of. ERGO: comparing “a” and “b” is NOT useful tool to use for Assignment in this case (as might be expected)