1 / 15

HBr 6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions

Explore the complexities of J´ states in HBr spectroscopy, uncovering peak splits and peak identities while examining the energy interactions between different states. Discover potential variations in absorption peaks and the challenges of matching slope and intersect values.

ctim
Download Presentation

HBr 6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HBr 6pp.. vs. V(m+17) state interactions

  2. https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf: 7 6........... 2, 1,0 8 Idea See slides below)

  3. https://notendur.hi.is/jil3/work/HBr/New%20states.pdf:

  4. https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf: From Q lines DE(J´,J´-1) This differs a lot from Longs Results (Why?): J´ https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512ak.pxp

  5. https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/papers/jcp93-4624-90.pdf:

  6. Is this peak split? Are these J´= 0 and 1 peaks In which case J´=8 Is this Br Atomic Line? ? https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512aka.pxp

  7. https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-240512aka.xls: It could be that there are two peaks In this are in which case j’ increases by one In which case the highest J´observed is indeed J´=8 But not J´=7(?) DE(J´,J´-1) !! J´ https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp

  8. Fig. 4 for HBr-New States-paper: Energetics: https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/XLS-240512ak.xls

  9. V1S+(v´=m+18) : Energy / cm-1 Near-reonance Interaction J´ E1S+(n=6; v´=0) 8 8 7 Off-reonance Interactions 2 V1S+(v´=m+17) 6pp3S-(v´=0) https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512ak.pxp and PPT file for Fig.4 in HBr-New States-paper

  10. http://www.raunvis.hi.is/~agust/rempisvaedidir/JCP01755.pdf: • DnJ,J+1 = 2(B´-B´´)J´ + 2(B´-B´´) for Q lines • a = b (slope = intersect)

  11. a(intersect)= = -15.145 ± 4.46 b(slope) = -11.788 ± 1.24 i.e. for J´=0 J´+1 = 1 ! J´ a = -3.3571 ± 5.53 b = -11.788 ± 1.24 J´ https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp

  12. a = 8.4307 ± 6.66 b = -11.788 ± 1.24 This is what one expected to give closes a and b values Skip top and bottom points https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp

  13. a = -25.886 ± 3.36 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 a = -17.456 ± 4.3 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 This is what one expected to give closes a and b values https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp

  14. a = -9.026 ± 5.27 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 Closest values for slope and intersect ERGO: J´min = 3, J+1 =4! a = -0.596 ± 6.25 b = -8.43 ± 1.01 https://notendur.hi.is/agust/rannsoknir/rempi/hbr/Jan12/PXP-240512akb.pxp

  15. Large variation in the match of “a” and “b” depending on what peaks are taken account of. ERGO: comparing “a” and “b” is NOT useful tool to use for Assignment in this case (as might be expected)

More Related