1 / 14

NETIS 4th Meeting 3-5, March 2008, London

Network Learning Experiences István Bessenyei, Information Society Research and Teaching Group, University of West Hungary, Sopron. NETIS 4th Meeting 3-5, March 2008, London. University of West Hungary, Faculty of Economics

cynthia-pittman
Download Presentation

NETIS 4th Meeting 3-5, March 2008, London

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Network Learning Experiences István Bessenyei, Information Society Research and Teaching Group, University of West Hungary, Sopron NETIS 4th Meeting 3-5, March 2008, London

  2. University of West Hungary, Faculty of Economics • I. Semester 2007/2008: 15 students (in II.-IV., study year), 15x1,5 teaching units, elective • 4 selected modules: networks, technology, e-government, e-learning • II. Semester: 15 BSC students (I. study year), topic: data mining. The modules innovation and technology can be integrated in the teaching. The class

  3. Blended learning in a computer labor • Tasks for every students: • Essay, e-portfolio, glossary, self-controlling questionnaire, standard questionnaire of moodle on the learning process (fulfilled during the blended learning process) Activities

  4. Main didactic approaches • Starting point: reflection of everyday experiences of students (first the reflection of the own participation in social networks, afterthem the network theory or the economic networks.) • The competence catalogue (learning goals) as the basic of self organised learning • Blended learning: the students make the tasks (exclusive the essays) during the seminar. • Network learning: the students learn from each other. (Students with experiences with WIKI help in creating of e-portfolios

  5. Traditional centralised, linear learning vs. network learning: the tensions Cetralised knowledge sharing with intensive communication and feedback tools lead to „traffic collapse” Solution: horizontal, networked communication (between students, between specialists and students, between institutions)‏ The necessity of networking

  6. The necessity of knowledge maps and e-portfolios • What we needed for a networked learning? • Information about the knowledge structure of each other Problems: In which way we can document and share the knowledge in the learning network? What kind of knowledge we have? In which way we can register and document the prior learning experiment, the tacit knowledge? • A solution: knowledge maps, ePortfolios as tools

  7. Output steering or input steering? Linear model: the input is uniform, the output is different (The students get bad or good marks from 1 to 5)‏ Output steering: the input is different (adapted to the prior knowledge of the students), the output gets uniform. Personalised learning paths are necessary.

  8. The resistance of the institution The students and the university personal are socialized for the traditional centralized, linear learning and teaching To be familiary with the new technology and didactic requires in the initial phase a double if not triple expenditure of work for the same payment. The traditional regulations of the studies aren't compatible with the network learning. (Does the accreditation have a sense if 3-5 institutions teach together, in a cooperative network?

  9. Semantic uncertainty The linear model and the eLearning 2.0 are two different worlds with different logic and different ideas. This often prevents a constructive discussion. Examples of the tensions between the world of ideas

  10. Semantic uncertainty: the ideas Input: Central curriculum vs. Output: Competence portfolio Textbook vs. Information world in the web Lecture vs. Project Professor vs. Tutor, presenter, coach, consultant, network organizer Centralized knowledge distribution vs. Parallel knowledge processing Definition knowledge vs. Knowledge management Examination vs. Self evaluation, collective evaluation. Notes. Even made competence portfolios.

  11. Missed contents in the course • More about the knowledge based economy • More about business networks (influence of networking to he company organisation) • More about the world of labour (teleworking)

  12. Perspectives • Hungarian version • UWH, faculty of Wood Industry, Institute for Engineer-Teacher Education: NETIS Information Society course is integrated in the MCS application. • eLearning module will be part of a project for ICT-Teacher • English version • University of Vienna: accredited MSC course: Master of Business Informatics (ERASMUS joint degree project), INERG of UWH was project partner, task: elective Introduction to the Information Society. NETIS course can be a part of the MSC-course. • eLearning module will be part of a project for ICT-Teacher with an Austrianco-ordinator. (Project aplication is submitted.)

  13. Access Introduction to the Information Society http://netis.nyme.hu/ University of West Hungary: http://moodle.ktk.nyme.hu

  14. Thank you for the attention!

More Related