1 / 14

NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC INNOVATION

INNOVANET Innovation Engineering for the Support of Commercial / Scientific Discovery Don Allen (PIRA E-Media) dona@pira.co.uk Andreas Persidis (Biovista) IST- 2001-38422. NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC INNOVATION. Increasing Competition Innovation speed is becoming key

dacey
Download Presentation

NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC INNOVATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INNOVANETInnovation Engineering for the Support of Commercial / Scientific DiscoveryDon Allen (PIRA E-Media)dona@pira.co.ukAndreas Persidis (Biovista)IST- 2001-38422

  2. NEED FOR SYSTEMATIC INNOVATION • Increasing Competition • Innovation speed is becoming key • Competitive advantage based increasingly on knowledge content • There is an innovation deficit especially in knowledge intensive industries • Pressure for systematic innovation exists

  3. CURRENT ISSUES • AI and ‘expert mode’ operation of systems are not appropriate • The scientific discovery process needs to be understood • We need to think about: • Knowledge life cycle • Knowledge value chain

  4. GOALS OF INNOVANET • Strategic Roadmap on Systematic Innovation as an aid to R&D investment decision making • Create a model of systematic innovation based on knowledge life cycle and related principles • Align technology provider with end user views • Define a high-level specification of an Innovation Engineering Environment (IEE) • Create an interactive resource that helps design elements of the IEE

  5. PROJECT PLAN • Define a systematic innovation model • Perform a Delphi study • Qualitative questionnaire to finalize model • Quantitative questionnaire to confirm trends • Bibliometric analysis of EC projects, patents and scientific papers to identify trends in objective manner • Gap-fit analysis between current and desired state • Definition of an IEE and other resources • Creation of the Roadmap

  6. INNOVATION KNOWLEDGE LIFE CYCLE

  7. PHASES OF INNOVATION • Problem Identification • Ideation • Approach Development • Operationalisation • Evaluation • Exploitation

  8. KNOWLEDGE ACTIVITIES • Selection of communities/domains • Selection of knowledge sources • Focus on relevant knowledge • Apply knowledge • Gather experience • Rate and share experience

  9. GENERIC KNOWLEDGE OBJECT MANIPULATION FUNCTIONALITIES • Intelligent representation • Match-making • Discovery • Management of Knowledge Objects • Interaction / Communication

  10. SERVICES (1) • Intelligent representation • Editing, Visualization, Alignment, Updating, Packaging, Versioning • Match-making • Query support, semantic matching, personalization, brokering

  11. SERVICES (2) • Discovery • Trends analysis, applications discovery, needs discovery, aggregates discovery • Management of Knowledge Objects • Version control, comparables, terms of use, person/community profiling • Interaction / Communication • Thread comparison, emergence, thread content summarization

  12. FINDINGS (1) • Systematic Innovation (SI) is a controversial concept (considered essential by some and impossible/undesirable by others) • Tools for SI are currently not available in an integrated and usable form • The concepts of knowledge life cycle and knowledge value chain are central to SI • Soft (human-centric) issues which are important to SI are currently not well covered

  13. FINDINGS (2) • Scientific discovery principles need to be better modeled and tools to implement them should be created • Applications and Needs discovery are two steps that bridge the gap between products and needs that should be supported and can lead to SI • In the next 3-5 years software R&D funding should focus on a number of areas including the following: • Flexible representation schemes to cover updating, versioning, packaging and alignment of knowledge • Information resource alignment and interoperability • New Reasoning algorithms to provide synthesis and overview of complex data • Interface and visualisation techniques • Modeling and simulation • Planning and service integration

  14. INNOVANET CONSORTIUM

More Related