Association of Defense Communities 2013 Defense Communities National Summit

1. Association of DefenseCommunities2013 Defense Communities National Summit Mr. Tim Bridges SAF/IEI 12 June 2013

2. Major Items of Interest • Partnerships • Encroachment • Enhanced Use Lease • Strategic Basing • Transformation….a first step

3. Community Partnership InitiativeVision and Goals People closest to the mission are generating ideas in the “best interests of the Air Force” AF and Local Community Leadership is key! Bring AF leadership and resource support as Installation and Community leaders develop, prioritize and implement community partnership initiatives Practice the “Art of the Possible” Identify ways to get to “Yes” by identifying resource requirements: Time, Money, Manpower, Authority

4. AF Process The process is simple, but gaining efficiency requires hard work The AF Community Partnership Process is simple • Provide a Partnership “Brokering Team” when Installation and Community Leaders commit to using the AF process • Schedule a series of 6 meetings that enable identifying potential partnership initiatives • Identify potential initiatives; address mutual need & capacities • Once initiatives are “fleshed-out”, bring in experts to help define the way forward—this will help drive initiative priority • By the time of the Table Top Exercise, identify exactly: • WHAT resources are required • WHEN resources will be needed • WHO programs for resources • Do it! • Implement initiative if resourced; or program for resources 4 4

5. Potential Cross-Functional Initiatives • Prisoner Detention • Shared use Firing Ranges • Cooperative Police Training • AF Services-provided Airmen support programs • Youth Programs • Lodging • Community Educational Center near front gate • Waste Management/Recycling • Snow removal • Cooperative Fire Training/Support • Chaplain Programs • Pharmacy • Data Center Training/Cable Maintenance • Expand bus system • Airport Operations and Maintenance • University training of critical need interns • Strategic Sourcing • Sharing of Security intelligence

6. Prototype CommunityPartnership Locations • Altus AFB, OK • Beale AFB, CA • Buckley AFB, CO • Ellsworth AFB, SD • Hill AFB, UT • JB Andrews, MD • Nellis AFB, NV • Maxwell AFB, AL • Moody AFB, GA • Peterson AFB, CO • Patrick AFB, FL • Robins AFB, GA • Seymour Johnson AFB, NC • Sheppard AFB, TX • Tinker AFB, OK ANG Locations • Klamath Falls ANGB, OR • Ellington Field, TX • Fairchild AFB, WA

7. Encroachment Long-Term Mission Sustainment Competition for Resources Regulatory Restrictions Compatible Use Security Encroachment: any deliberate action by any governmental or non-governmental entity or individual that does, or is likely to inhibit, curtail, or impede current or future military activities within the installation complex and/or mission footprint; or deliberate military activity that is, or is likely to be incompatible with the use of a community’s resources.

8. Encroachment Challenges • Traditional: • Airborne Noise, Safety Zones, Urban Growth • Emerging: • Spectrum: EMI, frequency interference, rising noise floor • Energy Compatibility and Availability: • Compatible renewable energy • Utility scale wind turbine development • Clean Air Act regulations • New Issues in Urban Development: • Line of Sight Obstructions • Light Pollution • Water: Enterprise-wide vulnerability awareness needed • Missile field encroachment (unique to AFGSC) AF framework addresses traditional and emerging encroachment challenges

9. AF Encroachment Program • Working with Installations and Community stakeholders to address encroachment challenges • Encroachment on training and test ranges, airspace, military installations and electromagnetic spectrum is a critical issue for DoD and the Services • Requires a comprehensive process that includes engagement with Federal, State, and local government stakeholders • Establishes the need for action at all levels of leadership: Installation, MAJCOM and Air Staff • Must interact with the DoD Siting Clearinghouse (established 2011)--a single DoD voice promoting compatibility between energy security and military capabilities • An AF Encroachment Management Framework is established

10. Installation Complex Encroachment Action Plans (ICEMAP) • ICEMAPS through FY12 • Buckley AFB • Homestead ARB • Joint Base Langley-Eustis • Air Force Academy • Dobbins ARB • Joint Base Andrews • F.E. Warren AFB • Luke AFB • March ARB • Patrick AFB • Cannon AFB • Eastern Space Ranges • Tinker AFB • Travis AFB • Youngstown ARS • Pittsburgh ARS • Joint Base Elmendorf- Richardson • Shaw AFB • Holloman AFB • FY 13 planned ICEMAPS • Regional-Front Range, CO • RAF Lakenheath/Mildenhall/Feltwell • Kadena AB • Atlantic City IAP (ANG) & Warren Grove Range • Barksdale AFB • MacDill AFB • Minot AFB • Keesler AFB • Seymour Johnson AFB and Dare County Bombing Range • Robins AFB • Hill AFB and Utah Test and Training Range • Edwards AFB • Nellis AFB and Nevada Test and Training Range • Dyess AFB

11. Enhanced Use Leases • An EUL is a lease • By the government • Of “non-excess” property • Under the control of the government • To a public or private sector lessee • In exchange for at least fair market value rental payments in cash and/or in kind consideration

12. Why? …Win, Win, Win • Community • Supports base/State/local economic development • Increases tax base • Creates increased job opportunities • Developer • Financially beneficial, non-FAR business deal • Potential tax incentives & proximity to utilities • Project site security associated with installation security • Supports “highest and best” use of real estate; single/stable land owner • Air Force • Consideration recapitalizes Air Force facilities/infrastructure • Efficient Management of Assets…”highest and best” use • Supports DoD’s 1GW Renewable Energy Plan

13. Signed EULs • Nellis AFB • EUL facilitated quality of life upgrades for Airmen (new construction, maintenance, repair and restoration of facilities). • Land Lease for construction of Water Reclamation Facility • $25M Warrior Fitness Center -funded entirely through in-kind consideration

14. Signed EULs cont. Hill AFB • EUL facilitated new construction, maintenance and repairs. • Land Lease for construction of Falcon Hill National Aerospace Research Park - 8M SF of office space, hotels and restaurants • New Security Forces Building • Contractor Support Offices • New installation gate • Street improvements • All funded through EUL in-kind consideration monies 14

15. Signed EULs cont. • Eglin AFB • EUL for resort development creates funding and enhances mission capabilities. • Destin West Land Lease for construction of Holiday Inn Resort. • Eglin’s 96th Wing will install test monitoring equipment on hotel roof.

16. Developing EULs • Grand Forks AFB ND • EUL for 217 acres in SW corner of base to Grand Forks County • Potential consideration to fund Grand Forks AFB facility projects. • Opportunity exists to create Aviation Business Park.

17. Developing EUL Opportunities Grand Forks Travis JB McGuire- Dix-Lakehurst Nellis Edwards Holloman Robins Lackland Patrick- Malabar Annex Patrick-Ramey Energy Opportunities Real Estate Opportunity

18. What Next? • What you can do: • Understand value / benefits of EULs for your community and associated Air Force installation • View EUL Program Slides & Website: http://www.afcec.af.mil/eul/index.asp • Identify available parcels/opportunities • Discuss opportunities/benefits with • Community Representatives • Installation leadership • Participate in opportunity request solicitations • Submit unsolicited proposals

19. Contact Information EUL Program Contacts: Brian Brown – brian.brown.11@us.af.mil Strategic Asset Utilization Division Chief Chuck Cyr, AICP – charles.cyr@us.af.mil Business Development Branch Chief Dave Funk – david.funk.7@us.af.mil Execution Branch Chief Website: http://www.afcec.af.mil/eul

20. DISCUSSION