100 likes | 253 Views
Cost, Schedule, and Process Modeling Workshop. USC CSSE Annual Research Review Facilitated by Jo Ann Lane. Outline. COCOMO SRDR Calibration Delphi Incremental Development Productivity Decline (IDPD) Delphi ISCAS TWINS scheduling model Cost, schedule, process modeling future directions.
E N D
Cost, Schedule, and Process Modeling Workshop USC CSSE Annual Research Review Facilitated by Jo Ann Lane
Outline • COCOMO SRDR Calibration Delphi • Incremental Development Productivity Decline (IDPD) Delphi • ISCAS TWINS scheduling model • Cost, schedule, process modeling future directions
COCOMO SRDR Calibration Delphi • Introduced the planned SRDR calibration • Provided a view of SRDR in the CSIAC S2CPAT repository • Distributed survey asking participants to rate the “typical” COCOMO parameter ratings for SRDR types of projects • Sample size low at this point • Plan to solicit addition survey responses
Incremental Development Productivity Decline (IDPD) Delphi • Conducted review of IDPD hypothesis • Reviewed • Analysis conducted to date • Controlled small project experiments conducted to date
ISCAS TWINS Scheduling Model • Scheduling is not one big activity up front • Need to accommodate discovered risks, new projects, how best to mitigate risks/issues • Incremental scheduling and adjustment based on • Risksand issues • Mitigation approaches • Available resources and associated abilities
Cost, Schedule, Process Modeling Future Directions • Cost modeling • Software cost model updates (medium priority) • Agile development • Systems cost modeling for operations and post development (high priority x2) • Systems cost model updates (high priority) • System of systems cost modeling (high priority) • COTS cost modeling – understanding the mean lifespan of COTS products and risks when COTS reach end of life (high priority) • COTS cost model updates (medium priority)
Cost, Schedule, Process Modeling Future Directions • Schedule modeling • Agile schedules for software development • System development schedules for operation and post deployment (high priority) • System development schedule models, e.g., COSYSMO (high priority) • SoSKanban scheduling (high priority)
Cost, Schedule, Process Modeling Future Directions • Process modeling • Software development processes (high priority) • Systems engineering processes (medium priority) • SoS process modeling (high priority x2) • COTS process modeling (low priority) • Other • NASA data-based research /results across all areas on the board
Cost, Schedule, Process Modeling Future Directions POCs • Cost modeling • Software cost model updates (medium priority) Epps • Agile development Vaughn • Systems cost modeling for operations and post development (high priority) (McNeil) • Systems cost model updates (high priority) • System of systems cost modeling (high priority) • COTS cost modeling – understanding the mean lifespan of COTS products and risks when COTS reach end of life (high priority) • COTS cost model updates (medium priority) • Schedule modeling • Agile schedules for software development • System development schedules for operation and post deployment (high priority) • System development schedule models, e.g., COSYSMO (high priority) • SoSKanban scheduling (high priority) • Process modeling • Software development processes (high priority) • Systems engineering processes (medium priority) • SoS process modeling (high priority x2) • COTS process modeling (low priority) • Other • NASA data-based research /results across all areas on the board