330 likes | 556 Views
Copyright January 31, 2007. 2. Introduction to the Problem. Rigors of achieving process control and consistencyNatural products have natural variances
E N D
1. Micro Analytical GC System for Tea Aroma in Product Quality Control Fred Lewis, Principal Chemist,
Analytical Science Laboratory, Unilever
John Crandall, Analytical Specialists – presenter
Brian Rohrback – President, Infometrix
2. Copyright January 31, 2007 2
3. Copyright January 31, 2007 3 Current Analytical Method & Results Column & Injection
DB1 60 m X .32 mm I.D. X 1u thickness
1 uL C6/MeCl2
Injector - 250 C
Detector – 300 C
Temperature Program
Initial - 40 C for 2 min.
Rate - 4 C/min., 52.5 min.
Final - 250 C for 10 min.
Total run time - 64.5 min.
He carrier gas at 1 mL/min.
4. Copyright January 31, 2007 4 Slow, Complicated & Expensive The GC/MS method
Does an excellent job
Requires advanced expertise
Costs in excess or $100K to implement
A faster, simpler, more cost effective solution was sought Solution Process
First step
Reduce chromatography time to seconds, not minutes
Second step
Simplify sample collection, preparation and injection process
Third step
Simplify & automate the data handling
Automate the instrumentation
5. Copyright January 31, 2007 5 First Step Solution, Fast GC Faster GC requirements
Preserve resolution as required
Preserve sensitivity
Simplify operation
Significantly reduce capital & operating costs
6. Copyright January 31, 2007 6 Analytical Process (initially the same) & microFAST GC System Prepared Standards
Selected “standard” aldehydes, ketones & acids are prepared in C6/MeCl2
Bromobenzene used as an internal standard
Prepared Samples
An aliquot of aqueous sample is measured & extracted
Extract solvent is C6/MeCl2 with bromobenzene included
GC/MS System
Microliters of the extracted liquid are injected
Using pre-established response factors & internal standard, the concentration of the “standards” is determined
7. Copyright January 31, 2007 7 microFAST GC Analytical Method
8. Copyright January 31, 2007 8 Results
9. Copyright January 31, 2007 9 Direct Comparison
10. Copyright January 31, 2007 10 Results Standard components
2 pairs measured as a “a pair”
Are identified by the method
Quantify as necessary with adequate
Resolution
Sensitivity
11. Copyright January 31, 2007 11 Second Step Solution, Fast Sampling System Faster sampling requirements
Preserve important sample components
Take care to prevent sampling “bias”
Preserve sensitivity
Simplify operation (eliminate L/L extraction)
Significantly reduce capital & operating costs
12. Copyright January 31, 2007 12 Analytical Process Changes & Fast Sampling System Prepared Standards
Selected “standard” aldehydes, ketones & acids are prepared in C6/MeCl2
Bromobenzene used as an internal standard
Prepared Samples
An aliquot of aqueous sample is measured & put in a vial
SP/ME fiber is exposed to heated sample headspace gas
SP/ME fiber is “desorbed” in the microFAST GC inlet
microFAST GC System
Desorbed fiber components are trapped, then desorbed into GC columns
Using pre-established response factors & internal standard, the concentration of the standard & samples are determined
13. Copyright January 31, 2007 13 Initial Results a
14. Copyright January 31, 2007 14 Initial Results
15. Copyright January 31, 2007 15 Results & More Questions Tea Aroma analysis is possible in 5 minutes
No lab chemicals or extraction skills are necessary
Production could use system “near line”
To speed up sample transportation & result generation
Simplify production quality decision process
Turn around could be reduced
From up to 4 hours
To less than 15 minutes What about sample bias?
What about data processing?
What about automation?
16. Copyright January 31, 2007 16 Sampling Bias from SP/ME Fiber to sample exposure time
1 minute is inadequate
15 minutes is excellent but too long
5 minutes is adequate
Sample temperature set at 60 C
17. Copyright January 31, 2007 17 Data Processing: PCA Scores Plot Examples Principal Component Analysis
Simple example demonstrates distinct data clusters
Models will include
microFAST GC data
Sensory panel information
Production parameters
And be automated for production consistency & control
18. Copyright January 31, 2007 18 Third Step Solution,Automation Prospects Laboratory hardware and methods testing
SP/ME holder
Auto sampler
Synchronization of devices
Laboratory software and data processing
Chemometric modeling
System automation, data presentation, reporting and archiving
19. Copyright January 31, 2007 19 What’s Next? Moving on towards
Standardized product profiling
Monitoring product changes during storage
Objectively determining if and when our processes have changed
Supporting human sensory panels in mapping product attributes
Here are examples Concept is proven
Fast GC provides sufficient
Data
Simplicity
Speed
With system costs under $50,000
Chemometrics provides
Total system automation
Data processing and
Sophisticated results in the hands of normal process operators.
20. Copyright January 31, 2007 20 SP/ME Product Profiles Spaghetti Sauce Olive Oil
21. Copyright January 31, 2007 21 Reconstructed SP/ME Product Profiles
22. Copyright January 31, 2007 22 Reconstructed SP/ME Product Profiles – Expanded Scale
23. Copyright January 31, 2007 23 SP/ME Product Profiles - PCA
24. Copyright January 31, 2007 24 Re-analysis to Separate Peanut Butter and Olive Oil
25. Copyright January 31, 2007 25 Latest SP/ME Tea Aroma Overlaid SP/ME Standard
26. Questions?
27. Copyright January 31, 2007 27 Expanded GC/MS Trace
28. Copyright January 31, 2007 28 Optimum Fiber Exposure (5 Minutes)
29. Copyright January 31, 2007 29 Overlaid Results
30. Copyright January 31, 2007 30 Olive Oil
31. Copyright January 31, 2007 31 Peanut Butter
32. Copyright January 31, 2007 32 Spaghetti Sauce