E N D
1. Modern Loran Receivers: Current Performance and Future Enhancementsby Linn Roth, Ph.D.Locus, Inc.
3. Modern Loran Receivers vs 1990 Technology Receivers. Example Differences:
4. Antiquated Loran Infrastructure Control Currently Limits Loran System Performance
5. Example Accuracy with Current Infrastructure
6. FAA Tech Center Flight Tests - August 2001
7. FAA Tech Center Data: Sacramento AirportClose-up View of Landing and Takeoff
8. FAA Tech Center Data: Sacramento AirportClose-up View of Landing and Takeoff
9. FAA Tech Center Data: Atlantic City, NJ AirportClose-up View of Aug. 20 Takeoff and August 28 Landing
10. Derivation of “Quasi-ASFs” and Example Application to Flight Data
11. Example SatMate Quasi-ASF Results:Close-up of Atlantic City Airport
12. Modern Loran Technology: H-field AntennasE-field H-field
13.
14.
15. SatMate 1020 Tests, H-field Antenna 5/1/02 flight tests with Ohio University in Madison, WI
Included 10 ILS-guided approaches
WAAS GPS - Green; SatMate - Black
Simultaneous recording, positions updated 1/sec
SatMate 1020 using quasi-ASFs
16. SatMate 1020 Tests, H-field Antenna
17. SatMate 1020 Tests, H-field Antenna 3 representative examples of ILS-guided approaches
SatMate 1020 using quasi-ASFs generated ~ 8 miles from airport
SNRs 5-10 dB lower than expect to achieve
Results will improve with:
better transmitter control, airport-generated ASFs
improved receiver software and antenna hardware
18. Same 10 ILS Guided Approaches, No ASFs
19. Modern Loran Receivers: Future Enhancements
20.
21.
24. Preliminary Conclusions:
25. Modern Loran Receivers: Current Performance and Future Enhancementsby Linn Roth, Ph.D.Locus, Inc.