1 / 37

Leveraging New DoD Antiterrorism Guidelines to Reduce Construction Costs

Leveraging New DoD Antiterrorism Guidelines to Reduce Construction Costs. Presented by Barry Band, PE, SE, Structural Engineer. Presentation Agenda. Brief history of Antiterrorism Guidelines Philosophical changes Applicability of UFC 4-010-01 Unaffected Standards Removed Standards

danielg
Download Presentation

Leveraging New DoD Antiterrorism Guidelines to Reduce Construction Costs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leveraging New DoDAntiterrorism Guidelines to Reduce Construction Costs Presented by Barry Band, PE, SE, Structural Engineer

  2. Presentation Agenda Brief history of Antiterrorism Guidelines Philosophical changes Applicability of UFC 4-010-01 Unaffected Standards Removed Standards Changes in each Standard Future Changes

  3. Khobar Tower BombingDhahran, Saudi Arabia June 25, 1996

  4. UFC 4-010-01 History Downing Commission Report, 1996 Interim DoD Antiterrorism / Force Protection Construction Standards, 1999 UFC 4-010-01 Initial Publication, 2003 UFC 4-010-01 Second Major Revision, 2012 UFC 4-010-01 Change 1, 1 October 2013 UFC 4-010-01 Current Version, December 2018

  5. Philosophical Changes

  6. UFC 4-010-01 Applicability Determine if minimum AT/FP Standards are adequate per Chapter 3, UFC 4-020-01. Perform threat assessment for each facility Threat assessment for a facility is an installation function performed by programmers, antiterrorism officers and members of the threat working group

  7. UFC 4-010-01 Applicability Minimum AT/FP standards are adequate for facilities having a low threat likelihood and low value of assets Threat assessments requiring a Low Level of Protection or higher will require additional protection beyond UFC 4-010-01

  8. Unaffected Standards 11BuildingEntranceLayout 13Mail Rooms& LoadingDocks 14RoofAccess 15OverheadMountedArchitecturalFeatures 17Mail Room &Loading DockVentilation 19EquipmentBracing 20UnderBuildingAccess

  9. Removed Standards (No longer apply) 3Drive-Up/Drop-OffAreas 4AccessRoads

  10. Changed Standards 1StandoffDistances 2UnobstructedSpace 5ParkingBeneathBuildings/OnRooftops 6ProgressiveCollapse 7StructuralIsolation 8BuildingOverhangs &Breezeways 9ExteriorMasonryWalls 10Glazing(FormerlyWindows/Skylights) 12ExteriorDoors 16Air Intakes 18EmergencyAirDistributionShutoff 21MassNotification

  11. Changed StandardsStandard 1: Standoff Distances

  12. ChangedStandards 1StandoffDistances Installation Perimeter Without Clear Zone

  13. 1StandoffDistances 4th Brigade HeadquartersFort Bragg, NC 13

  14. Facility sited at minimum standoff distance • Structure hardened against blast

  15. Changed Standards ExampleStandard 1: Standoff Distances

  16. Changed StandardsStandard 2: Unobstructed Space

  17. Changed StandardsStandard 5: Parking Beneath Buildings/On Rooftops

  18. Changed StandardsStandard 6: Progressive Collapse

  19. 6ProgressiveCollapse Army ManeuverCenter of ExcellenceFort Benning, GA

  20. 6ProgressiveCollapse Army ManeuverCenter of ExcellenceFort Benning, GA

  21. 6ProgressiveCollapse

  22. Changed Standards ExampleStandard 6: Progressive Collapse

  23. Changed StandardsStandard 7: Structural Isolation

  24. Changed StandardsStandard 8: Bldg Overhangs & Breezeways

  25. Changed StandardsStandard 9: Exterior Masonry Walls

  26. Changed StandardsStandard 10: Glazing(Formerly Windows/Skylights)

  27. 10Glazing Naval Station Oceana Hangar 200Norfolk, VA

  28. Windows designed for blast loads • Steel tube framing to support window for blast loads

  29. Changed Standards ExampleStandard 10: Glazing

  30. Changed StandardsStandard 12: Exterior Doors

  31. Changed StandardsStandard 16: Air Intakes

  32. Changed StandardsStandard 18: Emergency Air Distribution Shutoff

  33. Changed StandardsStandard 21: Mass Notification

  34. Conclusions Standoff distance to roadways and parking no longer a consideration in site layout Progressive collapse retrofits to existing buildings eliminated All blast design requirements eliminated Reduced construction costs

  35. Future Changes to UFC 4-010-01

  36. Questions? Barry Band, Jr., PE, SE 540-857-3380barry.band@aecom.com

More Related