Mathematics Leadership Team

1. Mathematics Leadership Team Olympic ESD, Bremerton October 17, 2014 Tamara Smith

2. Who’s in the Room? • Attended Workgroups • Traveled to Europe • Teacher • Prefer Cats • Secondary Education • New to the group • Haven’t Traveled to Europe • Administrator, coach, TOSA • Prefer Dogs • Elementary Education

3. Washington State Regional Math Coordinators 2014-2015 Goals Goal 1: Provide equitable CCSS-M professional development opportunities for administrators and teachers through the statewide network. Goal 2: Increase student achievement by improving teachers’ ability to implement effective instructional practices and increasing teachers’ content knowledge. Goal 3: Increase the Capacity of Teacher Leaders to support CCSS-Math professional learning.

4. Building a System • 9 Regional Math Coordinators • Fellows • MEC RMSTs • Workgroups • Districts • Tamara Smith • Sue Bluestein • Heather Dorsey • Amanda Baumgartner • Greta Bornemann • Dawn Sparks • Andrew Hickman • Debra Kowalkowski • Mary Ellen Huggins

5. Building a System • 9 Regional Math Coordinators • Fellows • MEC RMSTs • Workgroups • Districts OESD Fellows • Andra Murray NKSD • Jenni Narimatsu CKSD • Catherine Pitcher CKSD • Jenn Bressert SKSD • Teresa McComber NMSD • Mary SheaChim. • Lisa Cartwright PTSD • Jim Miller PTSD • Katy MiddlesteadCres. • Victoria Strueker CFSD • Danny Kent QVSD • Cindy Larson BSD • Rhiannon Lawson BSD • Julie Lordon BSD • Lisa Elm BSD

6. Building a System • 9 Regional Math Coordinators • Fellows • MEC RMSTs • Workgroups • Districts • Townley Slack • Suzy Johansen • Ginger Lancaster

7. Building a System • 9 Regional Math Coordinators • Fellows • MEC RMSTs • Workgroups • Districts

8. Objectives • Developa deep understanding of the CCSS Math standards & the new Smarter Balanced assessments. • Understandthe role of building and district team leadership in supporting the implementation of the new standards. • Create a common vision of the strong connections between CCSS Math and new teacher and principal evaluation criteria and instructional frameworks. • Share, findand create resources with other district math leaders in the region.

9. Key Learning • Deepen understanding of Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) & Smarter Balanced Assessments (SBA) • Focus on the 3 Shifts in Mathematics: Focus, Coherence, & Rigor • CCSS alignment in lesson design and curricular materials

10. The Instructional Core Text/Task “Content” Increasing the level and complexity of the curriculum/content. Context Teacher Student Increasing the knowledge, skills and expertise of the teacher. Changing the role of the student as learner. CHILDRESS, ELMORE, GROSSMAN, KING. Public Education Leadership Project, 2007

11. Key Learning • Deepen understanding of Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP) & Smarter Balanced Assessments (SBA) • Focus on the 3 Shifts in Mathematics: Focus, Coherence, & Rigor • CCSS alignment in lesson design and curricular materials At your tables, talk about each of these in relation to the Instructional Core

12. Agenda • Introductions & Overview • Documenting the Journey • NCTM “Principles to Action” • Updates Working Lunch • Generating an argument ~ Instructional Model • Grade Level Tasks • Equip Rubric – looking at our materials • Reflection/ Evaluation

13. 2014-2015 Meeting Pattern • State & national updates • Deep focus on the 3 Shifts in Mathematics: Focus, Coherence, & Rigor • Leadership learning Working Lunch & Team Time/Networking • Do the Math! • Regional Lesson Study: CCSS alignment in lesson design and classroom practice • Reflection/Evaluation

14. Meeting Dates

15. Documenting the Journey Create an infographic that represents our journey transitioning to the 2014 Washington State Learning Standards And the next steps in support of regional implementation

16. Considerations • Experiences • Workgroups • District PD • Conferences • Important Resources • Coordination with other District Initiatives Next steps Actions in the coming year Necessary tools and resources

17. Seven Stages of Concern (CBAM)

18. Eight Levels of Use

19. Reading: Progress and Challenge“NCTM Principles to Action” • Assumptions-What assumptions does the author of the text hold? • Agreements-What pieces of the text do you agree with? • Aspirations-What pieces of the text do you aspire to or act upon for yourself and your colleagues? Complete the protocol in table groups

20. Productive vs. Unproductive Beliefs

21. Beliefs “Teachers’ beliefs influence the decisions that they make about the manner in which they teach mathematics… Students’ beliefs influence their perception of what it means to learn mathematics and their dispositions toward the subject.” (NCTM, 2014)

22. Productive and Unproductive Beliefs • On a 3x5 card, individually brainstorm Productive and UnproductiveBeliefs teachers have about mathematics. Mathematics Practice Beliefs

23. Productive vs. Unproductive Card Sort

24. State and Regional Updates • SBAC Assessment System • Updated Graduation Requirements • http://k12.wa.us/assessment/StateTesting/default.aspx • http://www.sbe.wa.gov/graduation.php • Class of 2019 EOC • Dan Meyer – Flyer • OER review Grades 6 - 8 • http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1379423/OSPI-OER-Review-Application-2015 • Recording our work • Edmodo • ESD website

25. 11th grade Cut Scores • The statute requires that the cut score for high school graduation has to be set by the end of the 2014-2015 school year. In practice this will mean during summer of 2015, since we won’t have results until sometime late in the spring.  The students in the Class of 2019 will need to earn to earn the graduation cut-score on the SBAC or higher to graduate. For students in earlier  classes, earning the graduation cut-score on the SBAC is one option for meeting the assessment graduation requirement.

27. Lunch/ Team Time Please return at 12:55

29. Simulation for Generating an Argument ~Instructional Model

31. Stage One: Generating a Question and Beginning the Task • Martha wants to set up a soup stall at a Farmer’s Market and raise money for charity. • What questions do you have for Martha?

32. Selling Soup • Martha wants to set up a soup stall at a Farmer’s Market. • She hopes to sell 500 mugs of soup, each with a white or brown bread roll. • She wants to make as much profit as she can. • She doesn’twant to waste food at the end. • She needs to know how much of each flavor soup to buy and how many of each kind of bread roll to buy.

33. Stage 2: The Generation of a Tentative Argument • Take turns to explain your idea of how to respond to Martha’s Soup Question. • Listen carefully to each other and ask questions if you don’t understand. • Once you understand each other’s work, agree together in your group on the best approach for completing the problem. • Outline on your large sheet of paper the approach you are going to use.

34. Stage 2: Generation of a Tentative Argument Claim: The answer to Martha’s question. Evidence: Data to support your answer. (data charts, equations, graphs, tables, explanations, etc.) Justification: A rationale that explains why the evidence you use is relevant or important, along with any assumptions you have made regarding the problem.

35. Stage 3: The Argumentation Session Students are given an opportunity to share, evaluate and revise the products or process of their investigation with their classmates. • Visit other groups. • Use the Gallery Walk Interview Questions to guide your discourse. • Give feedback and be ready to take ideas back to your group.

36. Stage 4: A Reflective Discussion • Meet with your group • Discuss anything you learned from other groups • Discuss feedback on your group’s ideas • Modify/Revise original ideas based on feedback • Teacher facilitates whole class discussion • encouraging students to share what they learned • common challenges faced by groups

37. Stage 5: The Production of a Final Argument Each student makes sense of their experiences by producing a final argument • State the question and claim you are trying to support • Include evidence (data + analysis + interpretation) • Provide a justification of your evidence • Organize your argument in a way that enhances readability • Correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors

38. Reviewing the Stages of the Generate an Argument Instructional Model

39. Structuring Learning Leadership of Selfand Others • How does this instructional model help students develop skills to meet the intent of Mathematical Practice 3 and 6?

40. Equip Rubric

41. Reflection/Evaluation • Please complete the online PD survey as well as the standard ESD clock hour evaluation form

42. Online PD evaluation In order to identify your ESD’s most effective professional development strategies—practices and supports that impact teachers’ instructional shifts along with performance outcomes for students—we respectfully request participants complete a survey at the end of a training or series of trainings. The purpose of the survey is to simply identify which pieces of the training(s) that we provide best support your needs as an educator. We ask for your name on the survey only to be able to match demographic and performance data to your responses. In no way will the data be used to evaluate you or your work. In fact, your name will be deleted from the record once the data are matched thus ensuring your responses are anonymous.

43. The data collection will ensure the continuous improvement of professional development professional learning experiences for math, science and ELA. The collection of these data also helps to ensure the continued funding of free or low-cost, high-quality professional development in math, science, and ELA. We deeply appreciate your cooperation. Thank you.

44. Evaluation Survey To access the math survey type this address into your browser: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1823995/AESD-Math-PD-Reflection Course Name: Mathematics Leadership Team Mtg. 1 Date: October 17, 2014 Clock hours: 5.5 ESD 114 OR Scan this QR code with your tablet or smartphone. (Note: You may need to download an app to allow scanning to work.)