1 / 23

Climate Change Policy: Overview of Options to Reduce GHG Emissions Liz Brosius, KEC Director

Climate Change Policy: Overview of Options to Reduce GHG Emissions Liz Brosius, KEC Director KEC GHG Policy Committee, April 9, 2008. Where we are today. 2007 U.N. IPCC report states that there is a “very high confidence” that human activities are causing a net warming of the planet.

dannon
Download Presentation

Climate Change Policy: Overview of Options to Reduce GHG Emissions Liz Brosius, KEC Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Climate Change Policy: Overview of Options to Reduce GHG Emissions Liz Brosius, KEC Director KEC GHG Policy Committee, April 9, 2008

  2. Where we are today • 2007 U.N. IPCC report states that there is a “very high confidence” that human activities are causing a net warming of the planet. • Human activities = combustion of fossil fuels and the subsequent release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere

  3. Where we are today • Policymakers at every level of government are considering options for stabilizing and then reducing GHG emissions • Leading economic analysts have studied this problem for decades and conclude that market-based policies are the most cost-effective way to reduce GHG emissions

  4. Where we are today • The world has finite resources and many competing uses for them • Tackling global warming, even with optimally efficient policies, will be expensive • Wise climate change policy should aim to get the most reduction of GHGs for every dollar spent

  5. Policies to reduce GHGs • Economy-wide GHG tax (most efficient, least cost) • Economy-wide hybrid cap-and tax (permit auction, safety valve) • Cap-and-trade with permit banking, borrowing, and auction • Cap-and-trade with permit giveaway • Command-and-control mandates and standards (least efficient, highest cost)

  6. Scope of problem • Global warming is a problem requiring an international, collective solution • GHG emissions cause equal harm no matter where they are emitted. • Will require establishment of international regulatory framework and institutions

  7. Scope of policy options • In the U.S., a national-level approach is appropriate focus for policymakers • starting point for international policy • U.S. responsible for 21% of global emissions • Provides uniformity, level playing field • does not unduly disadvantage certain states or regions • avoids redundancy and lack of uniformity of state-by-state or regional approach

  8. Scope of policy options • Regional initiatives: MGA, RGGI, WGI • State-level “climate action plans” or GHG emissions goals • largely focused around non-market mandates, standards • GHG emitters may avoid doing business in those states, regions, effectively bypassing regulation • most costly way to reduce emissions

  9. Policy options to reduce GHGs • Market-based initiatives - carbon tax or cap-and-trade - set a price on emissions so that costs to society and environment are included in market prices • sends clear signals to producers and consumers • facilitates flexibility in policy setting and also in how firms and consumers respond

  10. Policy options to reduce GHGs • Non-market (command-and-control) policies mandate particular solutions and technologies or set minimum standards • less flexible: “one-size-fits-all” approach • promote specific solution, often without regard for costs and benefits • less opportunity for innovation and individualized decisions

  11. Carbon tax • Tax on each ton of CO2emitted (downstream) or each ton contained in fossil fuels (upstream). • Provides direct incentive to • reduce consumption, • substitute lower-carbon alternatives (where available), and • spur innovation • Establishes upper limit on cost of reducing emissions during given time period.

  12. Carbon tax • Easily adjusted to accelerate emissions reductions (by raising tax) or vice versa • Relatively inexpensive to administer • use existing tax infrastructure • Produces less predictable annual emissions reductions than inflexible cap • less predictable does not mean less reduction

  13. Carbon tax • Politically unpopular • cost to consumers is obvious • Generates revenue that can be used to • reduce other taxes (revenue neutral) • assist low-income households • fund energy science research • Best option for international consistency considerations (CBO)

  14. Cap-and-trade • Sets limit (cap) on quantity of total emissions during some period • issues permits equaling that cap • entities would be free to trade permits. • Setting initial level can be problematical • CBO estimates could cost 30% more than tax in lost benefits • Permit prices may vary drastically • Permit allocation is highly political • Produces incentives to cheat, “game” the system

  15. Cap-and-trade • Sets predictable annual reductions • More costly to administer than tax • requires new administrative infrastructure to track allowance holdings and transfers • upstream cap would not require emissions monitoring • Politically popular • cost to consumer is not obvious • Lowest ranked option for international consistency considerations (CBO)

  16. Hybrid cap-and-trade • Combines advantages of tax with cap-and-trade • One option: cap-and-trade combined with base carbon tax and safety-valve permits at penalty price • auction initial permits with base (floor) price as lower limit • sell unlimited quantities of allowances at safety valve (ceiling) price (e.g., 50% higher than base)

  17. Hybrid cap-and-trade • Auctioning permits: less political or subject to favoritism • may result in more equitable distribution • More efficient than cap-and-trade, less efficient than tax • Same administrative considerations as cap-and-trade

  18. Hybrid cap-and-trade • More politically popular than tax • Like tax, generates revenue • reduce other taxes (revenue neutral) • assist low-income households • fund energy science research • Mid-ranked option for international consistency considerations (CBO)

  19. Mandates and standards • Non-market / command-and-control policies include subsidies, tax credits, minimum standards • Politically popular • quantifiable goals and targets • costs often hidden • benefits targeted industries, sectors

  20. Mandates and standards • Most expensive approach • even when cost effective they are 10 times more expensive than market-based methods • Favor specific solutions • instead of encouraging lowest-cost reductions • can create counter-productive side effects

  21. Conclusions • Given the scope of problem and huge costs and challenges of solutions, important to chose policies that provide greatest reduction for each dollar spent • Honest policy debate acknowledges that all approaches to reducing GHG emissions will force consumers to pay more for goods and services that require combustion of fossil fuel

  22. Conclusions • Enactment of U.S. GHG policies that are national in scope is not only efficient, but it would clearly signal U.S. commitment to a common purpose. • Positions U.S. to take a leadership role in forging an international effort to fight this global problem.

  23. Further reading Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Policy and Economics, A Report Prepared for the Kansas Energy Council, by Trisha Shrum, August 2007 Policy Options for Reducing CO2 Emissions, Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Report, February 2008 A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, William Nordhaus, Yale University Press (pre-publication version available: http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/Balance_2nd_proofs.pdf).

More Related