290 likes | 393 Views
Understanding what Your Partnership Agreement Should I nclude Joel Sinkin, President Transition Advisors. Accounting Transition Advisors. National Consulting Firm working exclusively with accounting firms on issues related to ownership transition. Transition Advisors, LLC.
E N D
Understanding what Your Partnership Agreement Should Include Joel Sinkin, President Transition Advisors
Accounting Transition Advisors National Consulting Firm working exclusively with accounting firms on issues related to ownership transition
Transition Advisors, LLC Partners and Associates Joel Sinkin jsinkin@transitionadvisors.com President 631-493-0022 Terrence Putney tputney@transitionadvisors.com CEO 866-279-8550 Chris Frederiksen cfrederiksen@transitionadvisors.com National 415-924-3100
Transition Advisors, LLC Partners and Associates Bill Carlino bcarlino@transitionadvisors.com Managing Director – National Consulting Services 914-273-4327 Mark Basinski mbasinski@transitionadvisors.com California, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Utah 866-279-8550 Russ Best rbest@transitionadvisors.com Texas, Colorado, Missouri, Kansas 913-962-2563/214-453-1200
Transition Advisors, LLC Partners and Associates Nancy Egan negan@transitionadvisors.com Managing Director – National Consulting Services 814-807-1290 Peggy Tyers ptyers@transitionadvisors.com Toronto, Ontario Province 905-823-1585 Michael Farinelli mfarinelli@transitionadvisors.com National Business Development 913-866-8550
If there are 50 things you need to think about in a transaction……. ……the smartest of us will think of only 35
Key Elements to a Partnership Agreement Compensation Governance Death/Disability, Retirement Termination Unwinding the Partnership
Goals of Partner Compensation Motivate partner behavior to achieve desired strategic and financial results Create motivation for top performance by rewarding modified behavior Build a strong partner team through retention of the best performers, removal of non-performers, and attracting new talent
Equity-based • Committee-based • Leader-based • Equal • Lockstep • Pure Formula • Cross Evaluation Types of Compensation Plans
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Equal Often used in new partnerships Promotes collegiality Requires substantially equal contribution to be sustainable Long term, often fails to promote high performance
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Equity-based Often used in new partnerships Promotes collegiality Requires substantially equal contribution to be sustainable Long term, often fails to promote high performance
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Lockstep Based on seniority Often similar to Equity-based as equity normally accrues based on seniority Disguised as unit-based plan where units accumulate over time Over time tends to reward for past performance more than current
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Pure formula An accountant’s dream Relies mostly on pre-determined, objective measures Promotes clarity and certainty Leaves out hard to measure, subjective elements of performance Can be manipulated in many cases
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Cross Evaluation Relies on each partner evaluating other partners and allocating compensation Has appearance of fairness-democratic Requires knowledge by all partners of other partners’ contribution Tends to lump most partners into an average rating at the expense of recognizing outliers
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Leader-driven Managing Partner decides Requires strong managing partner and trust in their decision-making ability Most flexible … can be very effective Often lacks transparency which can lead to mistrust and lack of needed feedback
Types of Compensation Plans ◊ Committee-driven Appropriate for large firms Works well when knowledge of all partners’ contributions is not readily available to each partner or the managing partner Allows for flexibility and fair vetting of issues Can lack needed transparency Can be inefficient
Equity: What Does It Mean? Compensation Profit Sharing Decision making Internal buyouts External buyouts
Different Types of Partners? Full Equity – Senior Full Equity – Junior Income Of Counsel Using the term Principal
Governance Decision making Unanimous vs Super majority vs Simple majority Financial Commitments
Governance By way of example … Super majority Admission of new partner Simply majority Expenses in excess of certain amount Unanimous Dissolution or sale
Retirement ◊Voluntary Mandatory age / Vesting Partners desiring to stay on after retirement and how that impacts their role, compensation and buyouts Valuing equity Equity Compensation Funded vs unfunded Work backwards formula
Retirement ◊Terms Payout periods Retention periods Tax structure Caps Penalty buyouts Premature exit Exit without appropriate notice Getting “booted” out
Definition of temporary disability vs permanent • Where insurance fits in re disability • Death • Where insurance fits in re death Death or Disability
Termination Voting Grounds Non-Competes What is cause?
When is it appropriate and not appropriate? • How long can they be invoked • Allowing partners to leave with clients • Handling of: • Original clients • New clients • Firm name • Staff • Liabilities • Leases De-Merger Clauses
Other Thoughts External Sale/Dissolution Roles and responsibilities Hold harmless Non-competes Arbitration vs lawsuits Restrictive covenants: Leaving with or without clients
Transitioning Clients What are the clients’ fears? Is the partner/owner I trust still there? Is it going to cost me more money? Is the staff I am accustomed to working with part of the successor firm? Change IS A DIRTY WORD THE EMPHASIS NEEDS TO BE ON continuity NOT THE LOSS OF, BUT THE gainOF …
Miscellaneous It is a living agreement? Limit retirement timing Create benchmarks, time frames Replace the role, not the body
For More Information Please visit our website for resources including FREE reports, whitepapers and case studies. Joel Sinkin jsinkin@transitionadvisors.com 1-866-279-8550 www.TransitionAdvisors.com